43 research outputs found

    Electrophysiological underpinnings of reward processing: Are we exploiting the full potential of EEG?

    Get PDF
    Understanding how the brain processes reward is an important and complex endeavor, which has involved the use of a range of complementary neuroimaging tools, including electroencephalography (EEG). EEG has been praised for its high temporal resolution but, because the signal recorded at the scalp is a mixture of brain activities, it is often considered to have poor spatial resolution. Besides, EEG data analysis has most often relied on event-related potentials (ERPs) which cancel out non-phase locked oscillatory activity, thus limiting the functional discriminative power of EEG attainable through spectral analyses. Because these three dimensions -temporal, spatial and spectral- have been unequally leveraged in reward studies, we argue that the full potential of EEG has not been exploited. To back up our claim, we first performed a systematic survey of EEG studies assessing reward processing. Specifically, we report on the nature of the cognitive processes investigated (i.e., reward anticipation or reward outcome processing) and the methods used to collect and process the EEG data (i.e., event-related potential, time-frequency or source analyses). A total of 359 studies involving healthy subjects and the delivery of monetary rewards were surveyed. We show that reward anticipation has been overlooked (88% of studies investigated reward outcome processing, while only 24% investigated reward anticipation), and that time-frequency and source analyses (respectively reported by 19% and 12% of the studies) have not been widely adopted by the field yet, with ERPs still being the dominant methodology (92% of the studies). We argue that this focus on feedback-related ERPs provides a biased perspective on reward processing, by ignoring reward anticipation processes as well as a large part of the information contained in the EEG signal. Finally, we illustrate with selected examples how addressing these issues could benefit the field, relying on approaches combining time-frequency analyses, blind source separation and source localization

    Proactive Inhibitory Control of Response as the Default State of Executive Control

    Get PDF
    Refraining from reacting does not only involve reactive inhibitory mechanisms. It was recently found that inhibitory control also relies strongly on proactive mechanisms. However, since most available studies have focused on reactive stopping, little is known about how proactive inhibition of response is implemented. Two behavioral experiments were conducted to identify the temporal dynamics of this executive function. They manipulated respectively the time during which inhibitory control must be sustained until a stimulus occurs, and the time limit allowed to set up inhibition before a stimulus occurs. The results show that inhibitory control is not set up after but before instruction, and is not transient and sporadic but sustained across time. Consistent with our previous neuroimaging findings, these results suggest that proactive inhibition of response is the default mode of executive control. This implies that top-down control of sensorimotor reactivity would consist of a temporary release (up to several seconds), when appropriate (when the environment becomes predictable), of the default locking state. This conclusion is discussed with regard to current anatomo-functional models of inhibitory control, and to methodological features of studies of attention and sensorimotor control

    EMG as a key tool to assess motor lateralization and hand reaction time asymmetries

    No full text
    International audienceInconsistent and conflicting results about hand reaction time (RT) asymmetries have led to controversies over lateralization and hemispheric specialization for visuomotor transformations. In this paper, we propose a methodological solution to separate the central and peripheral processes that may be differently involved in simple visuomotor asymmetries. We provide empirical data from a simple RT task that suggests that fractionating RT into motor and premotor components with respect to a change in the electromyographic activity is necessary to disentangle motor and premotor lateralization patterns. These results call for a refinement of classical studies of visuomotor transformations using electrophysiologi-cal correlates of embedded but unrelated asymmetries rather than overt psychophysical measurements alone

    Asymétries manuelles en temps de réaction (rÎles de la planification du mouvement et de l'attention visuo-spatiale)

    No full text
    L'étude des mouvements rapides dirigés vers un but, qui sont à la base de nombre de gestes quotidiens et de l'ensemble des comportements impliquant une coordination perceptivo-motrice, révÚle des performances manuelles souvent asymétriques. L'objectif de ce travail est de contribuer à une meilleure compréhension de ce phénomÚne observé dans la préparation du mouvement. Une revue de littérature relative aux relations qu'entretiennent les asymétries cérébrales et les performances manuelles a permis de soulever certaines controverses méthodologiques et théoriques. Une série d'expérimentations dans lesquelles étaient manipulées les contraintes biomécaniques du mouvement, la planification spatiale et l'attention visuo-spatiale a permis, dans un premier temps, de valider l'utilisation du paradigme de Poffenberger pour l'étude des asymétries manuelles en temps de réaction. Dans un second temps, les résultats observés suggÚrent que ces asymétries manuelles observées lors de la réalisation de mouvements spatialement dirigés reposeraient, au moins en partie, sur un phénomÚne de dominance hémisphérique droite à la fois pour la planification spatiale et pour l'orientation de l'attention visuo-spatiale.POITIERS-BU Sciences (861942102) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Etude comportementale et neurofonctionnelle des effets de la présentation d'un signal avertisseur en temps de réaction simple (alerte ou contrÎle inhibiteur des automatismes visuomoteurs ?)

    No full text
    L'attention est gĂ©nĂ©ralement Ă©tudiĂ©e au moyen de tĂąches d'amorçage destinĂ©es Ă  estimer dans quelle mesure un signal prĂ©paratoire va permettre d'amĂ©liorer le traitement de la cible a venir. Les interprĂ©tations de l'effet de la prĂ©sentation d'un signal prĂ©paratoire neutre suggĂšrent en gĂ©nĂ©ral que le signal avertisseur provoque un effet d'alerte qui amĂ©liore la rĂ©activitĂ© gĂ©nĂ©rale du sujet. Toutefois, ce signal d'alerte provoque Ă©galement des activations Ă©lectromyographiques automatiques et non dĂ©sirĂ©es susceptibles de dĂ©clencher des rĂ©ponses anticipĂ©es (chapitre III). Ce phĂ©nomĂšne justifie la nĂ©cessitĂ© d'implĂ©mentation d'un contrĂŽle inhibiteur proactif, dĂ©montrĂ©e au chapitre IV grĂące notamment Ă  l'utilisation de l'IRMf. Une conclusion importante de ces deux premiĂšres parties expĂ©rimentales du travail est que les mĂ©thodes expĂ©rimentales classiquement utilisĂ©es dans la littĂ©rature sont trĂšs susceptibles d'ĂȘtre biaisĂ©es par ce phĂ©nomĂšne qui influence considĂ©rablement les temps de rĂ©action Ă  la cible. Dans le chapitre V, ces considĂ©rations mĂ©thodologiques ont Ă©tĂ© mises Ă  profit pour affiner l'analyse IRMf dans le but d'isoler les structures directement responsables de la genĂšse du signal inhibiteur de celles sujettes Ă  l'inhibition. Un ensemble de structures beaucoup plus restreint que gĂ©nĂ©ralement observĂ© dans les Ă©tudes de l'inhibition motrice (cortex prĂ©frontal mĂ©dial et cortex pariĂ©tal infĂ©rieur) a Ă©tĂ© mis en Ă©vidence. L'inhibition gĂ©nĂ©rĂ©e par ce rĂ©seau s'appliqueraient aux structures corticales motrices (M1) et prĂ©motrices (AMS) ainsi qu'au putamen. Conjointement aux donnĂ©es Ă©lectroencĂ©phalographiques prĂ©sentĂ©es au chapitre VI, ces rĂ©sultats suggĂšrent que l'inhibition s'applique au niveau des mĂ©canismes neuronaux responsables de l'initiation du mouvement. Il est conclu que de fortes interactions, voire d'importantes confusions, caractĂ©risent les fonctions attentionnelle, sensorimotrice et exĂ©cutive.Questions about attention are usually addressed by cueing tasks assessing whether knowledge of stimulus related information provided in advance will improve target processing. Most current interpretations suggest that a warning stimulus provokes an alerting of the organism resulting in a faster processing of either the sensory of the motor aspects of the task. However, as shown in chapter III, warning signals trigger automatic motor activations (observed on EMG) which are likely to cause false alarms. Chapter IV provides converging behavioral and fMRI evidences that classical cueing methods entail competing processes of automatic motor activation triggered by the cue and proactive response inhibition intended to counteract these automatic responses to the cue. It is concluded that some classical protocols generally used in attention research are likely to be biased and to reveal behavioural effects that are not attentional in origin. The paradoxical warning signal effect (proactive inhibition) was found to be mediated by the medial prefrontal cortex and the inferior parietal lobule, which is consistent with a role in volitional inhibition (chapter V). This inhibition would act on motor structures which are critical for connecting the basal ganglia and appealing the neuronal processes underlying movement initiation (M1, SMA, putamen). This premotor hypotesis was further reinforced in chapter VI by the electroencephalographic analysis of this effect. It is concluded that strong interactions (even confusions) are observed within attentional, sensorimotor and executive functions.POITIERS-BU Droit Lettres (861942101) / SudocSudocFranceItalyFRI

    Knowledge of Results and Explicit Instruction: Efficiency of Learning the Crawl Stroke in Swimming

    No full text
    International audienceSpecific verbal instructions when added to simple knowledge of results during learning the crawl stroke by 4 adult novices was followed after 1 mo. of no practice by a higher index of swimming than observed for 4 novices given only the qualitative knowledge of results
    corecore