30 research outputs found
Lees and Moonshine: Remembering Richard III, 1485-1635
Published version of article deposited in accordance with Sherpa Romeo guidelines. © University of Chicago Press, 2010publication-status: AcceptedNot long after Shakespeare’s birth (1564) the last witnesses to the reign of Richard III (1483-85) would have reached the end of their lives. Richard III (c. 1592) occupies a distinctive historical moment in relation to its subject – a period after the extinction of living memory, but still within the horizon of communicative memory, the period in which stories and recollections may be transmitted across multiple generations. This essay explores how memories and “postmemories” of Richard’s reign were preserved, transmitted and transformed over the course of the sixteenth century and into the seventeenth. Whilst reflecting the powerful influence of emerging contexts including the Reformation and, ultimately, Shakespeare’s play, these memories remained distinct from and sometimes at odds with textual history. They survived because they offered their bearers a resource for interpreting and resisting the predicaments of the present, from the problem of tyranny to the legacies of the Reformation
The Making of Englishmen: Debates on National Identity 1550–1650. Hilary Larkin. Studies in the History of Political Thought 8. Leiden: Brill, 2014. xi + 348 pp. $167.
The Memory Arts in Renaissance England: A Critical Anthology. William E. Engel, Rory Loughnane, and Grant Williams, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. xviii + 378 pp. $28.99.
Review of "Royalism, Religion and Revolution: Wales, 1640- 1688" by Philip Schwyzer.
Sarah Ward Clavier. Royalism, Religion and Revolution: Wales, 1640- 1688. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2021. xii + 266 pp. Review by Philip Schwyzer, University of Exete
The Drama of Memory in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Isabel Karremann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. xi + 210 pp. $99.99.
Fluid and loci : death and memory in Shakespearean plays
This study combines formal analysis of Shakespeare’s texts with an investigation of early modern English culture in order to explore the social energy circulating between. It argues that the conceptual categories of fluidity and loci are two features prevalent not only in Shakespeare’s plays specifically, but also in early modern English culture generally. Chapter One maps out the scholarship on death and memory in early modern English culture; Chapter Two investigates fluidity and loci in numerous forms, including humoral bodies, identities, money, commodity and texts, as regards physiology, economics, cosmology and politics. Chapter Three on Hamlet investigates corruption and fragmentation regarding both death and memory, and it also argues that Hamlet is troubled by memory’s excessiveness and fickleness. Chapter Four explores time, memory, emotion and death in Macbeth, followed by a study of Henry V, The Tempest and The Winter’s Tale in Chapter Five. There are two points underlying the argument of the whole thesis. The first point is that, whereas the brain-centred understanding of memory was predominant in early modern England as in other European countries, there was also a heart-centred tradition. Although the brain and reason still occupied pivotal positions in early modern England, the heart and emotion were given substantial attention by Shakespeare among others. As regards the relationship between the heart and the emotions, there were also two divergent attitudes to emotion: praise of emotion and denigration of emotion. As the connotations and history of the term “emotion” are complex, this study distinguishes between it and its synonyms such as passion, affection, feeling and the Chinese concept of qing. Other Chinese philosophies such as Daoism and theories including Yin-Yang theory and “Three Immortality” are also explored to shed light on the foci of this study. Secondly, this thesis argues that there are two categories of memory, namely, locative memory and fluid memory, and Shakespeare was influenced by both. It also contends that the eradication and displacement of memory provoked anxiety about memory, just as the displacement and annihilation of corpses, mainly caused by plagues and the Reformation as well as other factors, lead to heightened anxiety about death in early modern English culture.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceChinese Scholarship Council (CSC) : Overseas Research Students Awards Scheme (ORSAS)GBUnited Kingdo