113 research outputs found

    Insights into the ceria-catalyzed ketonization reaction for biofuels applications

    Get PDF
    The ketonization of small organic acids is a valuable reaction for biorenewable applications. Ceria has long been used as a catalyst for this reaction; however, under both liquid and vapor phase conditions, it was found that given the right temperature regime of about 150-300 °C, cerium oxide, which was previously believed to be a stable catalyst for ketonization, can undergo bulk transformations. This result, along with other literature reports, suggest that the long held belief of two separate reaction pathways for either bulk or surface ketonization reactions are not required to explain the interaction of cerium oxide with organic acids. X-ray photon spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and temperature programmed decomposition results supported the formation of metal acetates and explained the occurrence of cerium reduction as well as the formation of cerium oxide/acetate whiskers. After thermogravimetry/mass spectrometry and FT-IR experiments, a single reaction sequence is proposed that can be applied to either surface or bulk reactions with ceria

    Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Abstract Objectives: To assess the current practice of propensity score (PS) analysis in the medical literature, particularly the assessment and reporting of balance on confounders. Study Design and Setting: A PubMed search identified studies using PS methods from December 2011 through May 2012. For each article included in the review, information was extracted on important aspects of the PS such as the type of PS method used, variable selection for PS model, and assessment of balance. Results: Among 296 articles that were included in the review, variable selection for PS model was explicitly reported in 102 studies (34.4%). Covariate balance was checked and reported in 177 studies (59.8%). P-values were the most commonly used statistical tools to report balance (125 of 177, 70.6%). The standardized difference and graphical displays were reported in 45 (25.4%) and 11 (6.2%) articles, respectively. Matching on the PS was the most commonly used approach to control for confounding (68.9%), followed by PS adjustment (20.9%), PS stratification (13.9%), and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW, 7.1%). Balance was more often checked in articles using PS matching and IPTW, 70.6% and 71.4%, respectively. Conclusion: The execution and reporting of covariate selection and assessment of balance is far from optimal. Recommendations on reporting of PS analysis are provided to allow better appraisal of the validity of PS-based studies.

    Effect of Gas Atmosphere on Catalytic Behaviour of Zirconia, Ceria and Ceria Zirconia Catalysts in Valeric Acid Ketonization

    Full text link
    [EN] Ketonization of valeric acid, which can be obtained by lignocellulosic biomass conversion, was carried out in a fixed bed flow reactor over ZrO2, 5-20 % CeO2/ZrO2 and CeO2 both under hydrogen and nitrogen stream at 628 K and atmospheric pressure. Regardless gas-carrier 10 wt% CeO2/ZrO2 was found to show higher catalytic activity compared to zirconia per se as well as other ceria modified zirconia while ceria per se exhibited very low catalytic activity. All catalysts provided higher acid conversion in H-2 than in N-2 whereas selectivity to 5-nonanone was insensitive to gas atmosphere. XRD, FTIR, UV-Vis DRS, XPS, HRTEM methods were applied to characterize catalysts in reduced and unreduced states simulating corresponding reaction conditions during acid ketonization. XRD did not reveal any changes in zirconia and ceria/zirconia lattice parameters as well as crystalline phase depending on gas atmosphere while insertion of ceria in zirconia caused notable increase in lattice parameter indicating some distortion of crystalline structure. According to XPS, FTIR and UV-Vis methods, the carrier gas was found to affect catalyst surface composition leading to alteration in Lewis acid sites ratio. Appearance of Zr3+ cations was observed on the ZrO2 surface after hydrogen pretreatment whereas only Zr4+ cations were determined using nitrogen as a gas-carrier. These changes of catalyst's surface cation composition affected corresponding activity in ketonization probably being crucial for reaction mechanism involving metal cations catalytic centers for acid adsorption and COO- stabilization at the initial step.Financial support from the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (RFBR Grant No 11-03-94001-CSIC) is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by the Federal Program "Scientific and Educational Cadres of Russia'' (Grant No 2012-1.5-12-000-1013-002). The authors also wish to thank Dr. Evgeniy Gerasimov, Dr. Igor Prosvirin, Dr. Demid Demidov from the Department of Physicochemical Methods at the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis for TEM and XPS measurements.Zaytseva, YA.; Panchenko, VN.; Simonov, MN.; Shutilov, AA.; Zenkovets, GA.; Renz, M.; Simakova, IL.... (2013). Effect of Gas Atmosphere on Catalytic Behaviour of Zirconia, Ceria and Ceria Zirconia Catalysts in Valeric Acid Ketonization. Topics in Catalysis. 56(9-10):846-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0045-yS846855569-10Alonso DM, Bond JQ, Dumesic JA (2010) Green Chem 12:1493–1513Serrano-Ruiz JC, Wang D, Dumesic JA (2010) Green Chem 12:574–577Malhotra SL, Wong RW, Breton MP (2002) Patent US 6461417Westfechtel A, Breucker C, Gutsche B, Jeromin L, Eierdanz H, Baumann H, Schmid KH, Nonnenkamp W (1993) Patent DE 4121117Seipel W, Hensen H, Boyxen N (2001) Patent DE 19958521Tomlinson AD (2001) Patent WO 2001094522Glinski M, Kijenski J, Jakubowski A (1995) Appl Catal A Gen 128:209–217Glinski M, Kijenski J (2000) React Kinet Catal Lett 69:123–128Parida K, Mishra HK (1999) J Mol Catal A Chem 139:73–80Serrano-Ruiz JC, Dumesic JA (2009) Green Chem 11:1101–1104Serrano-Ruiz JC, Dumesic JA (2009) ChemSusChem 2:581–586Leung A, Boocock DGB, Konar SK (1995) Energy Fuels 9:913–920Gaertner CA, Serrano-Ruiz JC, Braden DJ, Dumesic JA (2010) Ind Eng Chem Res 49:6027–6033Saito N (1996) Patent JP 08198796Yakerson VI, Rubinshtein AM, Gorskaya LA (1970) Patent GB 1208802Graille J, Pioch D (1991) Patent EP 457665Pioch D, Lescure R, Graille J (1995) Ol Corps Gras Lipides 2:386–389Mueller-Erlwein E, Rosenberger B (1990) Chem Ing Tech 62:512–513Corma A, Renz M, Schaverien C (2008) ChemSusChem 1:739–741Bayer (1911) Patent DE 256622Vavon G, Apchie A (1928) Bull Soc Chim 43:667–677Thorpe JF, Kon GAR (1941) Org Synth 1:192–194Nagashima O, Sato S, Takahashi R, Sodesawa T (2005) J Mol Catal A Chem 227:231–239Klein-Homann W (1988) Patent DE 3709765Stubenrauch J, Brisha E, Vohs JM (1996) Catal Today 28:431–441Pulido A, Oliver-Tomas B, Renz M, Boronat M, and Corma A (2013) ChemSusChem 6:141–151Hendren TS, Dooley KM (2003) Catal Today 85:333–351Novothy R, Paulsen S (1963) Patent DE 1158050Kim KS, Barteau MA (1990) J Catal 125:353–375Pestman R, Van Duijne A, Pieterse JAZ, Ponec V (1995) J Mol Catal A 103:175–180Martinez R, Huff MC, Barteau MA (2004) J Catal 222:404–409Matsuoka K, Tagawa K (1985) Patent JP 61207354Shutilov AA, Simonov MN, Zaytseva YuA, Zenkovets GA, and Simakova IL (2013) Kinet Catal 54:184–192Kuriacose JC, Swaminathan R (1969) J Catal 14:348–354Swaminathan R, Kuriacose JC (1970) J Catal 16:357–362Cressely J, Farkhani D, Deluzarche A, Kiennemann A (1984) Mater Chem Phys 11:413–431Kuriacose JC, Jewur SS (1977) J Catal 50:330–341Renz M, Corma A (2004) Eur J Org Chem 2004:2036–2039Taimoor AA, Favre-Reguillon A, Vanoye L, Pitault I (2012) Catal Sci Technol 2:359–363Kustov LM (1997) Top Catal 4:131–144Emmanuel NM (1978) Usp Khim 8:1329–1396Kaspar J, Fornasiero P (2002) In: Trovarelli A (ed) Catalysis by ceria and related materials. Imperial College Press, LondonReddy DD, Chowdhury B, Smirniotis PG (2001) Appl Catal A Gen 211:19–30Rango R, Kaspar G, Meriani S, di Monte R, Graziani M (1994) Catal Lett 24:107–112Rao G, Sahu H (2001) Proc Indian Acad Sci (Chem Sci) 113:651–658Navío JA, Hidalgo MC, Colón G, Botta SG, Litter MI (2001) Langmuir 17:202–210Timofeeva MN, Jhung SH, Hwang YK, Kim DK, Panchenko VN, Melgunov MS, Chesalov YA, Chang JS (2007) Appl Catal A Gen 317:1–10Kaneko H, Taku S, Tamaura Y (2011) Sol Energy 85:2321–2330Maia TA, Assaf JM, Assaf EM (2012) Mater Chem Phys 132:1029–1034Zhou HP, Si R, Song WG, Yan CH (2009) J Solid State Chem 182:2475–2485Si R, Zhang YW, Li SJ, Lin BX, Yan CH (2004) J Phys Chem B 108:12481–12488Hadjivanov KI, Vayssilov GN (2002) Adv Catal 47:307–511Vivier L, Duprez D (2010) ChemSusChem 3:654–678Vidruk R, Landau MV, Herskowitz M, Ezersky V, Goldbourt A (2011) J Catal 282:215–227Binet C, Daturi M, Lavalley JC (1999) Catal Today 50:207–225Conesa J (1995) Surf Sci 339:337–35

    Once the shovel hits the ground : Evaluating the management of complex implementation processes of public-private partnership infrastructure projects with qualitative comparative analysis

    Get PDF
    Much attention is being paid to the planning of public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. The subsequent implementation phase – when the contract has been signed and the project ‘starts rolling’ – has received less attention. However, sound agreements and good intentions in project planning can easily fail in project implementation. Implementing PPP infrastructure projects is complex, but what does this complexity entail? How are projects managed, and how do public and private partners cooperate in implementation? What are effective management strategies to achieve satisfactory outcomes? This is the fi rst set of questions addressed in this thesis. Importantly, the complexity of PPP infrastructure development imposes requirements on the evaluation methods that can be applied for studying these questions. Evaluation methods that ignore complexity do not create a realistic understanding of PPP implementation processes, with the consequence that evaluations tell us little about what works and what does not, in which contexts, and why. This hampers learning from evaluations. What are the requirements for a complexity-informed evaluation method? And how does qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) meet these requirements? This is the second set of questions addressed in this thesis

    A constructive probabilistic proof of Choquet's theorem

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 18718.pdf ( ) (Open Access)Report no. 99135 p
    corecore