395 research outputs found

    The Life and Times of Textualism in South Africa

    Get PDF
    This paper analyses the dominant approaches to statutory interpretation through a historical lens. It argues that for most of South Africa's history the methods of interpretation were twisted in order to give effect to the intentions of the legislature. This approach to interpretation has now been discarded into the waste bin of history, and intentionalism has been replaced with contextualism. Or so we are told. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 4 SA 593 (SCA) has been hailed as the new, settled approach to interpretation, with the Constitutional Court endorsing Endumeni on numerous occasions. But it appears from both the judgments of the Constitutional Court and those of other Courts that intentionalism is not yet dead. This paper argues that the reason for this is because Endumeni has not provided clarity to the process of interpretation that it proclaims to do. &nbsp

    Fault Tolerance in Reversible Logic Circuits and Quantum Cost Optimization

    Get PDF
    Energy dissipation is a prominent factor for the very large scale integrated circuit (VLSI). The reversible logic-based circuit was capable to compute the logic without energy dissipation. Accordingly, reversible circuits are an emerging domain of research based on the low value of energy dissipation. At nano-level design, the critical factor in the logic computing paradigm is the fault. The proposed methodology of fault coverage is powerful for testability. In this article, we target three factors such as fault tolerance, fault coverage and fault detection in the reversible KMD Gates. Our analysis provides good evidence that the minimum test vector covers the 100 % fault coverage and 50 % fault tolerance in KMD Gate. Further, we show a comparison between the quantum equivalent and controlled V and V+ gate in all the types of KMD Gates. The proposed methodology mentions that after controlled V and V+ gate based ALU, divider and Vedic multiplier have a significant reduction in quantum cost. The comparative results of designs such as Vedic multiplier, division unit and ALU are obtained and they are analyzed showing significant improvement in quantum cost

    ไธๆ–‰ใƒ˜ใƒ†ใƒญ ใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒผใƒซใ‚นใƒปใ‚ขใƒซใƒ€ใƒผๅๅฟœใซ็”จใ„ใ‚‹ๆ–ฐ่ฆๆœ‰ๆฉŸๅˆ†ๅญ่งฆๅช’่ค‡ๅˆ็ณปใฎ้–‹็™บ

    Get PDF
    ๅŒป่–ฌๅ“ใ‚’ใฏใ˜ใ‚ใจใ™ใ‚‹ๅคšใใฎ็”Ÿ็‰ฉๆดปๆ€งๅŒ–ๅˆ็‰ฉใฏๅ…‰ๅญฆๆดปๆ€ง็‰ฉ่ณชใงใ‚ใ‚Š, ใใฎ้กๅƒ็•ฐๆ€งไฝ“ใฏ่–ฌใจๆฏ’ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใช๏ผŒไบ’ใ„ใซ็•ฐใชใ‚‹็”Ÿไฝ“ๅ†…ไฝœ็”จใ‚’็คบใ™ใ“ใจใŒๅคšใ„ใ€‚ใใฎใŸใ‚๏ผŒๆœ‰ๅŠนใชไธ€ๆ–นใฎ้กๅƒ็•ฐๆ€งไฝ“ใ‚’้ซ˜็ซ‹ไฝ“้ธๆŠž็š„ใซๅˆๆˆใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใฎไธๆ–‰ๅˆๆˆๅๅฟœใฎ้–‹็™บ๏ผŒ็‰นใซไธๆ–‰่งฆๅช’ใ‚’็”จใ„ใ‚‹่งฆๅช’็š„ไธๆ–‰ๅˆๆˆๅๅฟœใฎ้–‹็™บใฏ๏ผŒๆ–ฐ่–ฌใ‚„ใ‚ญใƒฉใƒซๆฉŸ่ƒฝๆ€งๅˆ†ๅญใ‚’ๅ‰ต่ฃฝใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซ้‡่ฆใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใใฎไธๆ–‰่งฆๅช’ใฎไธญใง๏ผŒ้‡‘ๅฑžใ‚’ๅซๆœ‰ใ—ใชใ„ๆœ‰ๆฉŸๅˆ†ๅญ่งฆๅช’ใฏๆฏ’ๆ€งใŒ็„กใ๏ผŒ็ฉบๆฐ—ไธญใงๅฎ‰ๅฎšใงใ‚ใ‚Šๅ–ใ‚Šๆ‰ฑใ„ใ‚„ใ™ใๅฎ‰ไพกใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใชใฉใฎๅˆฉ็‚นใ‚’ๆœ‰ใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚, ๆฌกไธ–ไปฃใฎ็’ฐๅขƒ่ชฟๅ’Œๅž‹่งฆๅช’ใจใ—ใฆ็พๅœจๆดป็™บใช็ ”็ฉถ้–‹็™บใŒ่กŒใชใ‚ใ‚Œใฆใ„ใ‚‹. ๅ…‰ๅญฆๆดปๆ€งใ‚นใƒ”ใƒญใ‚คใƒณใƒ€ใƒŽใƒผใƒซ้กžใฏ๏ผŒๆŠ—ใŒใ‚“๏ผŒๆŠ— HIVใ‚„ๆŠ—ใƒžใƒฉใƒชใƒคๆดปๆ€งใชใฉใฎๅคšๅฝฉใช็”Ÿ็‰ฉๆดปๆ€งใ‚’็คบใ™ใ“ใจใ‹ใ‚‰๏ผŒ็พๅœจใใฎใ‚นใƒ”ใƒญใ‚คใƒณใƒ€ใƒŽใƒผใƒซ้ชจๆ ผใ‚’ๆง‹็ฏ‰ใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใฎๆœ‰ๆฉŸๅˆๆˆๅๅฟœใฎ้–‹็™บใŒๆดป็™บใซ่กŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚่‘—่€…ใฏ๏ผŒใใฎๅˆๆˆๅๅฟœใจใ—ใฆ่งฆๅช’็š„ไธๆ–‰ใƒ˜ใƒ†ใƒญ ใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒผใƒซใ‚นใƒปใ‚ขใƒซใƒ€ใƒผๅๅฟœใซ็€็›ฎใ—๏ผŒใใฎๅๅฟœใซๆœ‰ๅŠนใชๆœ‰ๆฉŸๅˆ†ๅญ่งฆๅช’่ค‡ๅˆ็ณปใ‚’้–‹็™บใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ‚’็›ฎ็š„ใจใ—ใฆๆœฌ็ ”็ฉถใ‚’่กŒใฃใŸใ€‚่‘—่€…ใฏ๏ผŒๆœ‰ๆฉŸๅˆ†ๅญ่งฆๅช’่ค‡ๅˆ็ณปใจใ—ใฆ๏ผŒฮฒโ€”ใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽใ‚ขใƒซใ‚ณใƒผใƒซใŠใ‚ˆใณฮฒโ€”ใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽใ‚ทใƒชใƒซใ‚จใƒผใƒ†ใƒซใ‚’ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œ่งฆๅช’ใจใ—๏ผŒใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽ้…ธใ‚’ๅŠฉ่งฆๅช’ใจใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚คใ‚ตใƒใƒณ้กžใจใ‚จใƒŽใƒณ้กžใจใฎไธๆ–‰ใƒ˜ใƒ†ใƒญ ใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒผใƒซใ‚นใƒปใ‚ขใƒซใƒ€ใƒผๅๅฟœใ‚’ๆคœ่จŽใ—ใŸใ€‚ใใฎ็ตๆžœ๏ผŒ่งฆๅช’ใจใ—ใฆใฏใใฎๅˆ†ๅญไธญใซ็ฌฌ๏ผ‘็ดšใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽๅŸบใ‚„็ฌฌ๏ผ‘็ดšๆฐด้…ธๅŸบ๏ผŒใพใŸใ‚ทใƒญใ‚ญใ‚ทๅŸบใ‚’ใ‚‚ใคใ‚ทใƒณใƒ—ใƒซใชใ‚ญใƒฉใƒซฮฒโ€”ใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽใ‚ขใƒซใ‚ณใƒผใƒซใพใŸใŠใ‚ˆใณฮฒโ€”ใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽใ‚ทใƒชใƒซใ‚จใƒผใƒ†ใƒซใŒ๏ผŒใพใŸๅŠฉ่งฆๅช’ใจใ—ใฆใฏใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽๅŸบใซไฟ่ญทๅŸบใ—ใŸฮฑโ€”ใ‚ขใƒŸใƒŽ้…ธใŒๆœฌๅๅฟœไธญใง่ค‡ๅˆ็š„ใซ่งฆๅช’ๆดปๆ€งๆฉŸ่ƒฝใ‚’็™บ็พใ—๏ผŒๅ„ชใ‚ŒใŸๅŒ–ๅญฆๅŽ็Ž‡ใจใ‚ธใ‚ขใ‚นใƒ†ใƒฌใ‚ช้ธๆŠžๆ€งใŠใ‚ˆใณใ‚จใƒŠใƒณใƒใ‚ช้ธๆŠžๆ€งใง็›ฎ็š„ใฎใ‚ญใƒฉใƒซใ‚คใ‚ตใƒใƒณ่ช˜ๅฐŽไฝ“ใŒๅพ—ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒๆ˜Žใ‚‰ใ‹ใจใชใฃใŸใ€‚ๆœฌ็ ”็ฉถใซใŠใ„ใฆ่‘—่€…ใฏ๏ผŒๅ…‰ๅญฆๆดปๆ€งใ‚นใƒ”ใƒญใ‚คใƒณใƒ€ใƒŽใƒผใƒซ้กžใฎๅˆๆˆใซๆœ‰ๅŠนใชไธๆ–‰ใƒ˜ใƒ†ใƒญ ใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒผใƒซใ‚นใƒปใ‚ขใƒซใƒ€ใƒผๅๅฟœใซ็”จใ„ใ‚‹ๆ–ฐ่ฆๆœ‰ๆฉŸๅˆ†ๅญ่งฆๅช’่ค‡ๅˆ็ณปใ‚’้–‹็™บใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซๆˆๅŠŸใ—ใŸใ€‚้–‹็™บใ—ใŸๆœฌ่งฆๅช’็ณปใฏ๏ผŒไป–ใฎๅ‰ต่–ฌใฎใŸใ‚ใซๆœ‰็”จใชไธๆ–‰่งฆๅช’ๅๅฟœใซใŠใ„ใฆใ‚‚่งฆๅช’ๆฉŸ่ƒฝใ‚’็คบใ™ใ“ใจใŒๆœŸๅพ…ใ•ใ‚Œ๏ผŒใ•ใ‚‰ใซ๏ผŒๆœฌๅๅฟœใซใ‚ˆใฃใฆๅพ—ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ๅ…‰ๅญฆๆดปๆ€งใ‚นใƒ”ใƒญใ‚คใƒณใƒ€ใƒŽใƒผใƒซ้กžใฏๆŠ—ใŒใ‚“ไฝœ็”จใ‚„ไป–ใฎๆง˜ใ€…ใช็”Ÿ็‰ฉๆดปๆ€งๅŒ–ๅˆ็‰ฉใฎๅˆๆˆไธญ้–“ไฝ“ใจใ—ใฆใ‚‚ๆœ‰็”จใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ‹ใ‚‰๏ผŒๆœฌ็ ”็ฉถใฎๆˆๆžœใฏ, ๆ–ฐ่–ฌๅ‰ต่ฃฝใ‚’ๆŒ‡ๅ‘ใ—ใŸๅˆๆˆ้–‹็™บ็ ”็ฉถใซๅคงใใ่ฒข็Œฎใงใใ‚‹ใจๆœŸๅพ…ใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹.Many biologically active compounds, including pharmaceuticals, are optically active and often only one of the enantiomer shows a high biologically activity. Therefore, it is important to develop the synthetic methodology for providing only necessary enantiomer. As the methodology, catalytic asymmetric synthesis, in which the use of a low amount of a chiral catalyst theoretically enables infinite production of optically active compounds, is the most efficient in the synthetic organic chemistry field. Moreover, this methodology is also important in terms of energy saving and environmental friendliness. The chiral catalysts used in catalytic asymmetric syntheses can be divided into two categories of organometallic catalyst and metal-free organocatalyst. Particularly, organocatalyst is stable in air, nontoxic, easy to handle, and inexpensive, so they are being focused on as next-generation, environmentally friendly catalysts. Spirooxindoles are considered to be promising scaffolds in drug discovery. The structure of spirooxindoles is contained in many compounds having pharmacological activities such as contraceptive, anti-HIV, anticancer, antituberculosis, antimalarial, and antiproliferative drugs. Therefore, the development of an effective strategy for the preparation of highly optically pure spirooxindoles is a significantly challenging task in research. The hetero Dielsโ€“Alder (HDA) reaction is a versatile tool for effectively forming heterocyclic compounds. Especially, the catalytic asymmetric version of this reaction is the most efficient and convenient method for constructing a chiral heterocyclic skeleton, which acts as a precursor for many biologically active compounds and drugs. In this class of HDA reactions, the reaction of isatins with enones is one of the superior organic transformations for providing unique chiral spirooxindoles containing quaternary chiral carbon center on the structure. Author tried to explore new catalysts component system for this reaction using isatins as diene and enones as dienophile. As a result, author developed simple two catalysts component system consisting of primary ฮฒ-amino alcohol or ฮณ-amino silyl ether as catalysts and N-protected amino acid as a co-catalyst for the asymmetric HDA reaction of isatins with enones for the first time. These dual component systems showed efficient catalytic activities to afford the chiral spirooxindoles that are efficient synthetic intermediates for many biologically active compounds and drug discovery, in good to excellent chemical yields and with enough stereoselectivities. In this study, author revealed that the new explored catalysts component system showed excellent catalytic activity to the asymmetric HDA reaction of isatins with enones. It is expected that this results should be able to greatly contribute the development of new drugs and its related compounds.ๅฎค่˜ญๅทฅๆฅญๅคงๅญฆ (Muroran Institute of Technology)ๅšๅฃซ๏ผˆๅทฅๅญฆ๏ผ‰ๅฝ“ใ‚ขใ‚คใƒ†ใƒ ใฏ่ฆๆ—จใฎใฟใฎๅ…ฌ้–‹ใซใชใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™๏ผˆ2021-6-23

    Studies on the Effects of Bioprocess Parameters and Kinetics of Rhamnolipid Production by P. aeruginosa NITT 6L

    Get PDF
    Biosurfactants are gaining popularity in recent times due to lower toxicity, biodegradability, environmental compatibility and activity in extreme conditions. An air isolate was isolated previously for biosurfactant production in our laboratory, and characterized and named as P. aeruginosa NITT 6L. The biosurfactant thus produced was characterized to be surface-active rhamnolipid. This paper presents the study of the influence of various bioprocess parameters such as agitation, aeration and inoculum volume on rhamnolipid production by the isolate. Kinetics of rhamnolipid production in optimized media and process conditions were investigated. The rhamnolipid production was found to be increased after nitrogen depletion during stationary phase. The maximum rhamnolipid concentration of about 7.65 g Lโ€“1 was achieved after 96 h. Logistic model was found to be satisfactory in fitting the microbial growth. Emulsification activity of the crude rhamnolipid extract with different hydrocarbons was studied. The crude extract of rhamnolipid reduced the surface tension of water from 71.4 to 27.5 mN mโ€“1, and CMC was about 11 mg Lโ€“1. Also, the usefulness of the extracted rhamnolipid produced under optimal conditions was investigated for remediation of crude oil contaminated soil. Soil washing with 0.3 % rhamnolipid removed about 71 % of crude oil present in sand samples within 24 h

    ์„ธ์‹ ๊ณผ ํฐ๊ฐ€๋ฏธ์•„ ์œ ๋ž˜ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ๋“ค์˜ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ์ข…๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ด์ถฉํ™œ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ์ž‘์šฉ๊ธฐ์ž‘

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™๊ณผ ๊ณค์ถฉํ•™ ์ „๊ณต, 2012. 8. ์•ˆ์šฉ์ค€.๋ชจ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ „์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋Ž…๊ทธ์—ด, ํ™ฉ์—ด, ๋ง๋ผ๋ฆฌ์•„ ์‚ฌ์ƒ์ถฉ์ฆ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๋‡Œ์—ผ ๋“ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์—ด๋Œ€โ€ข์•„์—ด๋Œ€์„ฑ์˜ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์งˆ๋ณ‘๋“ค์„ ๋งค๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ์œ„์ƒํ•ด์ถฉ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ณต์ค‘ ์œ„์ƒ๋ณด๊ฑด๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์œ ์ถฉ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์ œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๊ธฐ์ธ์ œ, ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฉ”์Šค๋ฆฐ, ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ, ๊ณค์ถฉ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ œ, ๋ฏธ์ƒ๋ฌผ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ง€์†์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์ธ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์—ฐ์ ์ธ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ €ํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ถœํ˜„์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋น„๋Œ€์ƒ ์ˆ˜์„œ์ƒ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์— ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋ฐฉ์ œ์ œ์˜ ํƒ์ƒ‰ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ฐ„ ์‚ถ๊ณผ ์งˆ์˜ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒ์  ๋ฐฉ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž์—ฐ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์ƒ๋ถ„ํ•ด๋˜์–ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ๋กœ์˜ ๋Œ€์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์‹๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์œ ๋ž˜๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ด์ถฉ์˜ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์นœํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ ์ด๊ณ , ๋น„์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€ํ”ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ์‹๋ฌผ์˜ ์ด์ฐจ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์‚ฐ๋ฌผ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹๋ฌผ์ฒด ์œ ๋ž˜ ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด์ถฉ๋ฐฉ์ œ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ฒด์ œ๋กœ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ์‹ (Asarum heterotropoides) ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ ์ •์œ ์™€ ๋ฉ”ํƒ„์˜ฌ ์ถ”์ถœ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋…์„ฑํ‰๊ฐ€์™€ ์ธ๋„ ์‹๋ฌผ Millettia pinnata (L.) Panigrahi (formerly known as Pongamia pinnata)์˜ ์ข…์ž ์œ ๋ž˜ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ 4์ข…์˜ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ฒ€์ •์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ๋™์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ๊ด€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ์‹  ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ ์ •์œ  ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ 3์ข…์˜ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Culex pipiens pallens), ์—์ง‘ํŠธ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Aedes aegypti), ํ† ๊ณ ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Ochlerotatus togoi) 3๋ น ์œ ์ถฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ์ง์ ‘-์ ‘์ด‰ ์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ฒ€์ •๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” fenthion๊ณผ temephos๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ์‹  ๋ฟŒ๋ฆฌ ์ •์œ ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์ˆ˜์น˜์‚ฌ๋†๋„(LC50) ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ (LC50, 21.07โ€“27.64 ppm)์˜ ์ข‹์€ ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ safrole (LC50, 8.22โ€“16.10 ppm), terpinolene (11.85โ€“15.32 ppm), g-terpinene (12.64โ€“17.11 ppm), (โ€“)-ฮฒ-pinene (12.87โ€“18.03 ppm), (+)-limonene (13.26โ€“24.47 ppm), 3-carene (13.83โ€“19.19 ppm), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ฮฑ-phellandrene (13.84โ€“23.08 ppm)์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋น„๊ต ๋Œ€์ƒ์ธ fenthion (LC50, 0.023โ€“0.029), temephos (0.016โ€“0.020)๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ธ์‹  ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ ์ •์œ  ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์ด ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ๋ฐฉ์ œ์ œ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์„ธ์‹  ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋™์ •ํ•œ (โ€“)-asarinin, ฮฑ-asarone, methyleugenol, pellitorine, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  pentadecane์˜ ๋…์„ฑํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ-๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ[Culex pipiens pallens (KS-CP strain)], ์—์ง‘ํŠธ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Aedes aegypti), ํ† ๊ณ ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Ochlerotatus togoi) ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ์— ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์•ผ์™ธ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ[Culexx pipiens pallens (DJ-CP colony)]์˜ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ 3๋ น๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ค‘ํ•ฉํšจ์†Œ ์—ฐ์‡„๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ fenthion ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  temephos์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ-๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ[Culex pipiens pallens (KS-CP strain)], ์—์ง‘ํŠธ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Aedes aegypti), ํ† ๊ณ ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ(Ochlerotatus togoi) ๋ชจ๊ธฐ 3์ข…์˜ 3๋ น๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ Pellitorine (LC50, 2.08, 2.33, 2.38 ppm)์€ (โ€“)-asarinin, ฮฑ-asarone, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  methyleugenol๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐ๊ฐ 5.5โ€“25.6๋ฐฐ 4.5โ€“24.7๋ฐฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  6.9โ€“24.6๋ฐฐ ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, pentadecane์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋“  ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ fenthion๊ณผ temephos๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ์‹  ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ ์œ ๋ž˜๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ค‘ ํŠนํžˆ (โ€“)-asarinin๊ณผ pellitorine์€ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์ˆ˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋œ ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์— ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•จ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. Pellitorine์„ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ์™€ pellitorine์„ (โ€“)-asarinin, ฮฑ-asarone, methyleugenol, pentadecane์™€ 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:1, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  3:1 ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•œ ์ด์ง„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ-๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ(KS-CP strain), ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ-์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ(DJ-CP colony) ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ 3๋ น๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…์„ฑํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘-์ ‘์ด‰ ์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ฒ€์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Pellitorine๊ณผ asarinin (3:1๋น„์œจ) ์ด์ง„ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ KS-CP ์œ ์ถฉ๊ณผ DJ-CP ์œ ์ถฉ์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.95ppm, 1.07ppm์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, pellitorine [KS-CP (2.08 ppm), DJ-CP(2.33 ppm)]๊ณผ asarinin(11.45, 12.61 ppm)์„ ๋‹จ๋…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋…์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ๊ณผ pellitorine์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณต๋™ ๋…์„ฑ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(co-toxicity, CC)์™€ ์ƒ์Šน ์ธ์ž(synergistic factor, SF)๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ 3๊ฐœ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ์ด์ง„ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ(1/3, 2/1, 3/1)์—์„œ ์ƒ์ŠนํŒจํ„ด[KS-CP (CC, 250โ€“390/ SF, 1.4โ€“2.2)DJ-CP (CC, 257โ€“279 ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  SF, 1.1โ€“2.1)]์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. Pellitorine๊ณผ (โ€“)-asarinin ์ด์ง„ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์ˆ˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ธ๋„ ์‹๋ฌผ์ธ Millettia pinnata ์ข…์ž์—์„œ ์œ ๋ž˜ํ•œ ํ™œ์„ฑ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ๋…์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ-๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ, ์—์ง‘ํŠธ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์•ผ์ƒ ํฐ์ค„์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง์ ‘-์ ‘์ด‰๋ฒ• ์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ฒ€์ •๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉ์ œ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” fenthion, temephos์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Millettia pinnata์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ karanjin (1), karanjachromene (2), pongamol (3), pongarotene (4), ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ์‚ฐ (5), and ํŒ”๋ฏธํŠธ์‚ฐ (6)์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 24์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋…ธ์ถœํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์ˆ˜์น˜์‚ฌ๋†๋„(LC50)๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ฒ€์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ karanjin (14.61 and 16.13 mg/L)์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ์‚ฐ (18.07 and 18.45 mg/L) ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  karanjachromene (18.74 and 20.57 mg/L) ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์—์ง‘ํŠธ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ง‘๋ชจ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ด ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์€ fenthion (LC50, 0.0031๊ณผ 0.0048 mg/L) ๋˜๋Š” temephos (0.021๊ณผ 0.050 mg/L)๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. pongamol (LC50, 23.95์™€ 25.76 mg/L), pongarotene (25.52์™€ 37.61 mg/L), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํŒ”๋ฏธํŠธ์‚ฐ (34.50 and 42.96 mg/L)์€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ์‚ฐ (LC50, 18.79 mg/L)์€ ํฐ์ค„์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋ถ„(LC50, 35.26- 85.61 mg/L)์€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. M. pinnata ์ข…์ž ์œ ๋ž˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ ๋ฌผ์งˆ, ํŠนํžˆ karanjin, karanjachromene, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ์‚ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ์ˆ˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋œ ๋†’์€ ๋…์„ฑ์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์— ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•จ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ์œ ๋ž˜ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์‚ด์ถฉ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ๊ธฐ๋ฐฉ์ œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹ค์ œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ ์‚ด์ถฉ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์€ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋˜๋Š” ๋น„๋Œ€์ƒ ์ƒ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์ง€์‹์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด์ถฉ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ๋ฐœํ˜„์˜ ์›์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋‹จ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•ด์ถฉ์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์ฑ…์— ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์„ ๋ฐœ๋œ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ด์ถฉ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์•„์„ธํ‹ธ์ฝœ๋ฆฐ์—์Šคํ„ฐ๋ผ์ œ (AChE)์˜ ์ €ํ•ด๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์กฐ์ง๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์‹œ ๋ชจ๊ธฐ์œ ์ถฉ ์œ„์žฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—์ง‘ํŠธ์ˆฒ๋ชจ๊ธฐ 3๋ น๊ธฐ ์œ ์ถฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ AChE ์ €ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜์ˆ˜์ €ํ•ด๋†๋„(IC50)๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌโ€ขํ™•์ธ๋œ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ(IC50>ร—10-7)์€ AChe ์ €ํ•ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ƒ์šฉํ™”๋œ ์‚ด์ถฉ์ œ dichlorvos (DDVP) (IC50>4ร—10-7)๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ €ํ•ด๋Š” ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์ง๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” pellitorine์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์œ ์ถฉ ๋‚ด์˜ ์„ธํฌ์†Œ๊ธฐ๊ด€์ด ๊ด€ํ†ต, ์น˜ํ™˜ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํŒŒ๊ดด๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํˆฌ๊ณผ์ „์žํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ(Transmission electron microscope, TEM) ์‚ฌ์ง„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ 24์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ›„ ์„ธํฌ์†Œ๊ธฐ๊ด€์˜ ์†์ƒ์„ ํ™•์‹คํžˆ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.Mosquitoes are prevalent worldwide and common and serious disease vectoring insect pest. Mosquito larval abatement has been achieved principally by the use of organophosphorus insecticides (OPs), insect growth regulators, and bacterial larvicides. Continued and repeated use of these larvicides has disrupted natural biological control systems and led to resurgences of mosquitoes, often resulted in the widespread development of resistance, and has undesirable effects on aquatic nontarget organisms, and fostered environmental and human health concerns. Therefore, right now use of eco-friendly and cost-free plant based products for the control of mosquitoes is inevitable. Currently, numerous products of botanical origin, especially the secondary metabolites, have received considerable renewed attention as potentially bioactive agents used in insect vector management. In addition, studies on the mode of action of insecticides or plant-derived constituents are very important because it helps chemists to design additional chemicals with similar mode of action and because it could give scientists important clues as to the cause of resistance development in pests, particularly that involving target insensitivity, and thereby helps in designing countermeasures to avoid resistance or reverse the development of resistance. In this study, an assessment was made of the toxicity of constituents identified in Asarum heterotropoides root steam distillate, methanolic extract of the plant root, and Indian native plant Millettia pinnata (formerly known as Pongamia pinnata) seeds against third instars from insecticide-susceptible and -resistant mosquito species. The possible mode of action and delivery of the constituents are also examined. The toxicity of A. heterotropoides root steam distillate constituents to third instars of Culex pipiens pallens, Aedes aegypti, and Ochlerotatus togoi (formerly Aedes togoi) was examined using a direct-contact mortality bioassay. Results were compared with those following the treatment with OPs fenthion and temephos. A. heterotropoides root steam distillate exhibited good larvicidal activity (21.07โ€“27.64 mg/L) against three mosquito species, based on LC50 values. Potent activity was produced by safrole (LC50, 8.22โ€“16.10 mg/L), terpinolene (11.85โ€“15.32 mg/L), g-terpinene (12.64โ€“17.11 mg/L), (โ€“)-ฮฒ-pinene (12.87โ€“18.03 mg/L), (+)-limonene (13.26โ€“24.47 mg/L), 3-carene (13.83โ€“19.19 mg/L), and ฮฑ-phellandrene (13.84โ€“23.08 mg/L), although the larvicidal activity of these compounds was less toxic than either fenthion (LC50, 0.023โ€“0.029 mg/L) or temephos (0.016โ€“0.020 mg/L). The toxicity of (โ€“)-asarinin, ฮฑ-asarone, methyleugenol, pellitorine, and pentadecane identified in A. heterotropoides root to third instars from insecticide-susceptible Cx. p. pallens (KS-CP strain), Ae. aegypti, and Ochlerotatus togoi, as well as field-collected Cx. p. pallens (DJ-CP colony), identified by polymerase chain reaction, were compared with those of two mosquito larvicides: fenthion and temephos. Pellitorine (LC50, 2.08, 2.33, and 2.38 mg/L) was 5.5, 10.8, and 25.6 times, 4.5, 11.6, and 24.7 times, and 6.9, 11.1, and 24.6 times more toxic than (โ€“)-asarinin, ฮฑ-asarone, and methyleugenol against susceptible Cx. p. pallens, Ae. aegypti, and Oc. togoi larvae, respectively. Pentadecane was least toxic. Overall, all the compounds were less toxic than either fenthion or temephos. The toxic effect of pellitorine alone or in combination with (โ€“)-asarinin, ฮฑ-asarone, methyleugenol, and pentadecane (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:1, and 3:1 ratios) to third instars from insecticide-susceptible KS-CP strain and -resistant DJ-CP colony of Cx. p. pallens was likewise evaluated. Binary mixture of pellitorine and asarinin (3:1 ratio) was significantly more toxic against KS-CP larvae (0.95 mg/L) and DJ-CP larvae (1.07 mg/L) than either pellitorine (2.08 mg/L for KS-CP and 2.33 mg/L for DJ-CP) or asarinin (11.45 and 12.61 mg/L) alone. The toxicity of the other binary mixtures (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 2:1 ratios) and pellitorine did not differ significantly from each other. Based on the co-toxicity coefficient (CC) and synergistic factor (SF), the three binary mixtures (1:3, 2:1, and 3:1) operated in a synergy pattern (CC, 250โ€“390 and SF, 1.4โ€“2.2 for KS-CPCC, 257โ€“279 and SF, 1.1โ€“2.1 for DJ-CP). The toxicity of constituents derived from the seeds of Millettia pinnata to third instars of insecticide-susceptible Cx. p. pallens and Ae. aegypti and wild Aedes albopictus was examined. Results were compared with those of fenthion and temephos. The active principles of M. pinnata were identified as the karanjin (1), karanjachromene (2), pongamol (3), pongarotene (4), oleic acid (5), and palmitic acid (6) by spectroscopic analysis. Based on 24 h LC50 values, karanjin (14.61 and 16.13 mg/L) was the most toxic compound, followed by oleic acid (18.07 and 18.45 mg/L) and karanjachromene (18.74 and 20.57 mg/L). These constituents were less toxic than either fenthion (LC50, 0.0031 and 0.0048 mg/L) or temephos (0.021 and 0.050 mg/L) against Ae. aegypti and Cx. p. pallens. Low toxicity was produced by pongamol (LC50, 23.95 and 25.76 mg/L), pongarotene (25.52 and 37.61 mg/L), and palmitic acid (34.50 and 42.96 mg/L). Against third instars from Ae. alpopictus, oleic acid (LC50, 18.79 mg/L) was most toxic. Low toxicity was observed with the other five constituents (LC50, 35.26โ€“85.61 mg/L). Enzyme kinetics analysis acetylcholinesterase (AChE) was analyzed to identify compounds and also observed gastrointestinal changes of treated compounds through histopathological section. In AChE inhibition assay, there is no potent inhibition was observed (IC50 >10โ€“7) in isolated and identified compounds when compare with commercially available larvicides dichlorvos (DDVP) (IC50 >4 ร— 10โ€“7) against third instars of Ae. aegypti. The histopathological effects of pellitorine on larval segments of third instars of Aedes aegypti were examined by transmission electron microscopy. Results were compared with those of deltamethrin. At a concentration of 5 mg/L, pellitorine was targeted mainly on midgut epithelium and anal gills, indicating variably dramatic degenerative response of the midgut through a sequential epithelial disorganization. The anterior midgut was almost entirely necrosed, bearing only residues inside the plasma membranes on the basal lamina. The compound has shown complete damage of all glandular cells of anal gills, because cuticle damage was occurred by pellitorine. The histopathological effects 2.5 mg/L of deltamethrin on the different regions of the midgut clearly indicate the epithelial disorganization and delocalization of cell organelles which have been correlated with their morphofunctional status. Based on these results, pellitorine merit further study as a potential larvicide with a specific target site and mode of delivery or a lead molecule for the control mosquito populations. In conclusion, A. heterotropoides root-derived materials, particularly (โ€“)-asarinin and pellitorine, and M. pinnata seed-derived materials, particularly karanjin, karanjachromene, and oleic acid, merit further study as potential mosquito larvicides for the control of insecticide-resistant mosquito populations in the light of global efforts to reduce the level of highly toxic synthetic insecticides in the aquatic environment.TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION LITERATURE REVIEW CHAPTER I Isolation and Identification of Larvicidal Constituents Identified in Asarum heterotropoides Root 1.1. Larvicidal Activity of Asarum heterotropoides Root Steam Distillate Constituents against Culex pipiens pallens, Aedes aegypti, and Ochlerotatus togoi (Diptera: Culicidae) INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS 1.1.1. Chemicals 1.1.2. Mosquitoes 1.1.3. Steam Distillation 1.1.4. Gas Chromatography 1.1.5. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy 1.1.6. Bioassay 1.1.7. Data Analysis RESULTS 1.1.1. Chemical Constituents of A. heterotropoides Root Steam Distillate 1.1.2. Larvicidal Activity of Test Compounds DISCUSSION 1. 2. Larvicidal Activity of Asarum heterotropoides Root Constituents against Insecticide-Susceptible and -Resistant Culex pipiens pallens and Aedes aegypti and Ochlerotatus togoi INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS 1.2.1. General Instrumental Methods 1.2.2. Chemicals 1.2.3. Mosquitoes 1.2.4. Extraction and Isolation 1.2.5. Bioassay 1.2.6. Data Analysis RESULTS 1.2.1. Bioassay-Guided Fractionation and Isolation 1.2.2. Larvicidal Activity of Insecticides 1.2.3. Larvicidal Activity of Test Compounds 1.2.4. Species Susceptibility DISCUSSION 1.3. Enhanced Toxicity of Binary Mixtures of Larvicidal Constituents from Asarum heterotropoides Root to Insecticide-Susceptible and -Resistant Culex pipiens pallens INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS 1.3.1. Chemicals 1.3.2. Mosquitoes 1.3.3. Bioassay 1.3.4. Data Analysis RESULTS DISCUSSION CHAPTER II Isolation and Identification of Larvicidal Principles Identified in Millettia pinnata Seed against Insecticide-Susceptible Culex pipiens pallens and Aedes aegypti and Wild Aedes albopictus INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. General Instrumental Methods 2.2. Chemicals 2.3. Mosquitoes 2.4. Plant Material 2.5. Extraction and Isolation 2.6. Steam Distillation 2.7. Gas Chromatography 2.8. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy 2.9. Bioassay 2.10. Data Analysis RESULTS 2.1. Chemical Constituents of Indian Beech Seed Steam Distillate 2.2. Bioassay-Guided Fractionation and Isolation 2.3. Larvicidal Activity of Test Compounds 2.3. Larvicidal Activity of Steam Distillate Constituents DISCUSSION CHAPTER III Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition and Histopathological effects of phytochemicals on the midgut epithelium: Possible mode of action against mosquito larvae 3.1. Actylcolineesterase (AChE) inhibition of phytochemicals INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS 3.1.1. Chemicals and Reagents 3.1.2. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Assay RESULTS DISCUSSION 3. 2. Histopathological effects of pellitorine INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS 3.2.2. Chemicals and Reagents 3.2.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION LITERATURE CITEDDocto

    Growth, photoluminescence, lifetime, and laser damage threshold studies of 1, 3, 5-triphenylbenzene (TPB) single crystal for scintillation application

    Get PDF
    The 1, 3, 5-triphenylbenzene (TPB) single crystal has been grown using slow cooling seed rotation technique. Optical transmittance of the grown crystal was obtained from UV-Visible analysis. The grown TPB crystal has good transmission in the entire visible region with a lower cutoff wavelength of 330 nm. The solubility of TPB material was determined using toluene as a solvent with different temperatures. The full width at half maximum is 18 arcsec, which indicates that the crystal is of good quality. The TPB crystal was excited (lambda (exc)) at 307 nm, and the corresponding emission (lambda (em)) has been observed at 352 nm. The laser-induced damage threshold (LDT) value of grown crystal is 1.25 GW/cm(2). Third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility chi (3) is determined using the Z-scan technique as 3.07422x10(-09) esu. The TPB crystal proves its suitability for scintillation applications and optoelectronic device fabrications

    Determination of Residual Epichlorohydrin in Sevelamer Hydrochloride by Static Headspace Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection

    Get PDF
    A sensitive static headspace gas chromatographic method was developed and validated for the determination of residual epichlorohydrin (ECH) in sevelamer hydrochloride (SVH) drug substance. This method utilized a Phenomenex Zebron ZB-WAX GC column, helium as carrier gas with flame ionization detection. The critical experimental parameters, such as, headspace vial incubation time and incubation temperature were studied and optimized. The method was validated as per United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) and International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines in terms of detection limit (DL), quantitation limit (QL), linearity, precision, accuracy, specificity and robustness. A linear range from 0.30 to 10 ฮผg/mL was obtained with the coefficient of determination (r2) 0.999. The DL and QL of ECH were 0.09 ฮผg/mL and 0.30 ฮผg/mL, respectively. The recovery obtained for ECH was between 91.7 and 96.6%. Also, the specificity of the method was proved through gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This method was applied successfully to determine the content of residual ECH in SVH bulk drug

    A novel olfactory pathway is essential for fast and efficient blood-feeding in mosquitoes

    Get PDF
    In mosquitoes, precise and efficient finding of a host animal is crucial for survival. One of the poorly understood aspects of mosquito blood-feeding behavior is how these insects target an optimal site in order to penetrate the skin and blood vessels without alerting the host animal. Here we provide new findings that a piercing structure of the mouthpart of the mosquitoes, the stylet, is an essential apparatus for the stage in blood feeding. Indeed, the stylet possesses a number of sensory hairs located at the tip of the stylet. These hairs house olfactory receptor neurons that express two conventional olfactory receptors of Aedes aegypti (AaOrs), AaOr8 and AaOr49, together with the odorant co-receptor (AaOrco). In vivo calcium imaging using transfected cell lines demonstrated that AaOr8 and AaOr49 were activated by volatile compounds present in blood. Inhibition of gene expression of these AaOrs delayed blood feeding behaviors of the mosquito. Taken together, we identified olfactory receptor neurons in the stylet involved in mosquito blood feeding behaviors, which in turn indicates that olfactory perception in the stylet is necessary and sufficient for mosquitoes to find host blood in order to rapidly acquire blood meals from a host animal

    Advancing sustainable agriculture: a critical review of smart and eco-friendly nanomaterial applications

    Get PDF
    Undoubtedly, nanoparticles are one of the ideal choices for achieving challenges related to bio sensing, drug delivery, and biotechnological tools. After gaining success in biomedical research, scientists are exploring various types of nanoparticles for achieving sustainable agriculture. The active nanoparticles can be used as a direct source of micronutrients or as a delivery platform for delivering the bioactive agrochemicals to improve crop growth, crop yield, and crop quality. Till date, several reports have been published showing applications of nanotechnology in agriculture. For instance, several methods have been employed for application of nanoparticles; especially metal nanoparticles to improve agriculture. The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles such as core metal used to synthesize the nanoparticles, their size, shape, surface chemistry, and surface coatings affect crops, soil health, and crop-associated ecosystem. Therefore, selecting nanoparticles with appropriate physicochemical properties and applying them to agriculture via suitable method stands as smart option to achieve sustainable agriculture and improved plant performance. In presented review, we have compared various methods of nanoparticle application in plants and critically interpreted the significant differences to find out relatively safe and specific method for sustainable agricultural practice. Further, we have critically analyzed and discussed the different physicochemical properties of nanoparticles that have direct influence on plants in terms of nano safety and nanotoxicity. From literature review, we would like to point out that the implementation of smaller sized metal nanoparticles in low concentration via seed priming and foliar spray methods could be safer method for minimizing nanotoxicity, and for exhibiting better plant performance during stress and non-stressed conditions. Moreover, using nanomaterials for delivery of bioactive agrochemicals could pose as a smart alternative for conventional chemical fertilizers for achieving the safer and cleaner technology in sustainable agriculture. While reviewing all the available literature, we came across some serious drawbacks such as the lack of proper regulatory bodies to control the usage of nanomaterials and poor knowledge of the long-term impact on the ecosystem which need to be addressed in near future for comprehensive knowledge of applicability of green nanotechnology in agriculture
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore