13 research outputs found

    How Does Reprogramming to Pluripotency Affect Genomic Imprinting?

    Get PDF
    Human induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (hiPSCs) have the capacity to generate a wide range of somatic cells, thus representing an ideal tool for regenerative medicine. Patient-derived hiPSCs are also used for in vitro disease modeling and drug screenings. Several studies focused on the identification of DNA mutations generated, or selected, during the derivation of hiPSCs, some of which are known to drive cancer formation. Avoiding such stable genomic aberrations is paramount for successful use of hiPSCs, but it is equally important to ensure that their epigenetic information is correct, given the critical role of epigenetics in transcriptional regulation and its involvement in a plethora of pathologic conditions. In this review we will focus on genomic imprinting, a prototypical epigenetic mechanism whereby a gene is expressed in a parent-of-origin specific manner, thanks to the differential methylation of specific DNA sequences. Conventional hiPSCs are thought to be in a pluripotent state primed for differentiation. They display a hypermethylated genome with an unexpected loss of DNA methylation at imprinted loci. Several groups recently reported the generation of hiPSCs in a more primitive developmental stage, called naïve pluripotency. Naïve hiPSCs share several features with early human embryos, such as a global genome hypomethylation, which is also accompanied by a widespread loss of DNA methylation at imprinted loci. Given that loss of imprinting has been observed in genetic developmental disorders as well as in a wide range of cancers, it is fundamental to make sure that hiPSCs do not show such epigenetic aberrations. We will discuss what specific imprinted genes, associated with human pathologies, have been found commonly misregulated in hiPSCs and suggest strategies to effectively detect and avoid such undesirable epigenetic abnormalities

    BrewerIX enables allelic expression analysis of imprinted and X-linked genes from bulk and single-cell transcriptomes

    Get PDF
    Genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation (XCI) are two prototypical epigenetic mechanisms whereby a set of genes is expressed mono-allelically in order to fine-tune their expression levels. Defects in genomic imprinting have been observed in several neurodevelopmental disorders, in a wide range of tumours and in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) are readily detectable by RNA-sequencing allowing the determination of whether imprinted or X-linked genes are aberrantly expressed from both alleles, although standardised analysis methods are still missing. We have developed a tool, named BrewerIX, that provides comprehensive information about the allelic expression of a large, manually-curated set of imprinted and X-linked genes. BrewerIX does not require programming skills, runs on a standard personal computer, and can analyze both bulk and single-cell transcriptomes of human and mouse cells directly from raw sequencing data. BrewerIX confirmed previous observations regarding the bi-allelic expression of some imprinted genes in naive pluripotent cells and extended them to preimplantation embryos. BrewerIX also identified misregulated imprinted genes in breast cancer cells and in human organoids and identified genes escaping XCI in human somatic cells. We believe BrewerIX will be useful for the study of genomic imprinting and XCI during development and reprogramming, and for detecting aberrations in cancer, iPSCs and organoids. Due to its ease of use to non-computational biologists, its implementation could become standard practice during sample assessment, thus raising the robustness and reproducibility of future studies

    Metabolic control of DNA methylation in naive pluripotent cells.

    Get PDF
    Naive epiblast and embryonic stem cells (ESCs) give rise to all cells of adults. Such developmental plasticity is associated with genome hypomethylation. Here, we show that LIF-Stat3 signaling induces genomic hypomethylation via metabolic reconfiguration. Stat3-/- ESCs show decreased α-ketoglutarate production from glutamine, leading to increased Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b expression and DNA methylation. Notably, genome methylation is dynamically controlled through modulation of α-ketoglutarate availability or Stat3 activation in mitochondria. Alpha-ketoglutarate links metabolism to the epigenome by reducing the expression of Otx2 and its targets Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Genetic inactivation of Otx2 or Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b results in genomic hypomethylation even in the absence of active LIF-Stat3. Stat3-/- ESCs show increased methylation at imprinting control regions and altered expression of cognate transcripts. Single-cell analyses of Stat3-/- embryos confirmed the dysregulated expression of Otx2, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b as well as imprinted genes. Several cancers display Stat3 overactivation and abnormal DNA methylation; therefore, the molecular module that we describe might be exploited under pathological conditions

    Esrrb guides naive pluripotent cells through the formative transcriptional programme.

    No full text
    During embryonic development, naive pluripotent epiblast cells transit to a formative state. The formative epiblast cells form a polarised epithelium, exhibit distinct transcriptional and epigenetic profiles and acquire competence to differentiate into all somatic and germline lineages. However, we have limited understanding of how the transition to a formative state is molecularly controlled. Here we used murine ESC models to show that ESRRB is both required and sufficient to activate formative genes. Genetic inactivation of Esrrb leads to illegitimate expression of mesendoderm and extraembryonic markers, impaired formative expression and failure to self-organise in 3D. Functionally, this results in impaired ability to generate Formative Stem cells and primordial germ cells in the absence of Esrrb. Computational modelling and genomic analyses revealed that ESRRB occupies key formative genes in naive cells and throughout the formative state. In so doing, ESRRB kickstarts the formative transition, leading to timely and unbiased capacity for multi-lineage differentiatio

    Esrrb conveys naïve pluripotent cells through the formative transcriptional program

    No full text
    Pluripotency is the potential of a single cell to give rise to all embryonic lineages and first emerges in the naïve epiblast of the preimplantation embryo. Upon implantation, epiblast cells transit to a formative phase, which is preparatory for their differentiation into all somatic lineages and primordial germ cells (PGCs). Murine naïve embryonic stem cells (ESCs) recapitulate the molecular and functional properties of the naïve epiblast, including the capacity to acquire a formative state and differentiate. However, the transition to the formative state, and its functional relevance, is still heavily investigated. Here we observed that Esrrb, a pivotal naïve pluripotency factor, is both required and sufficient to activate formative genes. In naïve cells ESRRB occupies both naïve and formative gene loci. During the formative transition, however, ESRRB binding becomes consolidated on formative genes. Subsequently, ESRRB occupancy is mostly lost, and the formative transcriptional program is inactivated. Functionally, genetic inactivation of Esrrb leads to impaired PGC specification, spontaneous expression of mesendoderm and trophectoderm markers, and inability to generate Formative Stem (FS) cells. Moreover, the 3D organisation in a polarised epithelium with a central lumen, as observed in the formative epiblast, is impaired in the absence of Esrrb. Thus, Esrrb is critical for activating the formative transition and consequently for executing timely and unbiased multilineage differentiation and self-organisation of murine pluripotent cells

    Regulation of heterochromatin transcription by Snail1/LOXL2 during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

    No full text
    Although heterochromatin is enriched with repressive traits, it is also actively transcribed, giving rise to large amounts of noncoding RNAs. Although these RNAs are responsible for the formation and maintenance of heterochromatin, little is known about how their transcription is regulated. Here, we show that the Snail1 transcription factor represses mouse pericentromeric transcription, acting through the H3K4 deaminase LOXL2. Since Snail1 plays a key role in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), we analyzed the regulation of heterochromatin transcription in this process. At the onset of EMT, one of the major structural heterochromatin proteins, HP1α, is transiently released from heterochromatin foci in a Snail1/LOXL2-dependent manner, concomitantly with a downregulation of major satellite transcription. Moreover, preventing the downregulation of major satellite transcripts compromised the migratory and invasive behavior of mesenchymal cells. We propose that Snail1 regulates heterochromatin transcription through LOXL2, thus creating the favorable transcriptional state necessary for completing EMT
    corecore