Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnostic work-up of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (PICUS): study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study

Introduction Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) remains a dilemma for physicians as it is uncertain whether patients with IAP may actually have an occult aetiology. It is unclear to what extent additional diagnostic modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are warranted after a first episode of IAP in order to uncover this aetiology. Failure to timely determine treatable aetiologies delays appropriate treatment and might subsequently cause recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Therefore, the aim of the Pancreatitis of Idiopathic origin: Clinical added value of endoscopic UltraSonography (PICUS) Study is to determine the value of routine EUS in determining the aetiology of pancreatitis in patients with a first episode of IAP. Methods and analysis PICUS is designed as a multicentre prospective cohort study of 106 patients with a first episode of IAP after complete standard diagnostic work-up, in whom a diagnostic EUS will be performed. Standard diagnostic work-up will include a complete personal and family history, laboratory tests including serum alanine aminotransferase, calcium and triglyceride levels and imaging by transabdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography after clinical recovery from the acute pancreatitis episode. The primary outcome measure is detection of aetiology by EUS. Secondary outcome measures include pancreatitis recurrence rate, severity of recurrent pancreatitis, readmission, additional interventions, complications, length of hospital stay, quality of life, mortality and costs, during a follow-up period of 12 months. Ethics and dissemination PICUS is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Five medical ethics review committees assessed PICUS (Medical Ethics Review Committee of Academic Medical Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center and Maastricht University Medical Center). The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

Itapocú Inlet, Brazil. A study of the hydrodynamics and morphology

Despite the abundant appearance of coastal inlets in Brazil, there are not many studies carried out involving them. UNIVALI (Universidade do Vale do Itajai) has set up an investigation program to gain more insight into the hydrodynamic and morphologic behaviour of inlets along the Brazilian coast. The main goal of this study is to investigate the hydrodynamic behaviour and morpho- logy for Itapocú inlet, situated in the south of Brazil. As a sub-objective this study aims to give answer to the question what happens with the hydrodynamic and morphologic processes in case the inlet throat is stabilized with breakwaters. The hydrodynamic behaviour of Itapocú inlet is difficult to characterise. For that reason the changing inlet characteristics were obtained from a Delft3D model. The influence of the ocean is large during spring tide and periods of minor river discharge. However when the river discharge is large, or during neap tide, the basin is mainly regulated by the river. The reason for this continuing changing characteristic is that tidal prism and river discharge (during half a tidal cycle) have the same order of magnitude. The changing equilibrium between these two most important processes drives the morphology and hydrodynamic of the whole basin. The mouth of Itapocú inlet is very unstable. In the last 10 years, strong wave induced, northern directed, longshore sediment transport has shifted the entrance about 100 m per year to the north.Civil Engineering and Geoscience

Caracterização bioquímica de soros de bezerros utilizados na manutenção de culturas celulares usadas em virologia Biochemical characterization of calf sera used for the growth of cell cultures used in virology

Oito lotes de soros de bezerros com idade maior ou menor de seis meses, usados para suplementar meios de cultivo de linhagens de células de uso difundido em virologia, foram testados quanto à sua capacidade promotora de crescimento (CPC) e classificados como bons promotores ou promotores pobres. Foram pesquisados parâmetros relacionados com macronutrientes para estabelecer o perfil bioquímico daqueles lotes. Os resultados obtidos podem ser considerados valores normais para animais aparentemente sadios. As variações que ocorreram para um mesmo parâmetro bioquímico, entre os resultados da pesquisa e os de alguns estudos existentes na literatura, podem ser atribuídas à metodologia utilizada, à raça e idade dos animais, ou mesmo à própria dieta regional. A análise estatística, realizada pela aplicação do teste "t" de Student aos valores das médias e dos desvios padrão, demonstrou que, com relação às frações séricas, não ocorreram diferenças significantes entre soros de CPC celular boa ou pobre, considerando-se t c=2,45, enquanto que, para soros animais maiores ou menores de seis meses, apenas os resultados relativos às frações alfa e beta (t=2,68 e 2,61, respectivamente) apresentaram significância, sendo superiores ao t crítico. Ficou evidenciado que a avaliação do conjunto de parâmetros bioquímicos pesquisados não permite diferenciar soros pertencentes aos dois grupos de animais, isto é, identificar soros de boa ou de pobre CPC, ou soros de bezerros maiores ou menores de seis meses de idade<br>Eight lots of the calf sera employed to supplement culture media for the cultivation of animal cells, of widespread use in virology obtained from calves above and below six months of age were rated as good or as poor cell growth promoters according to their growth promoting capacity (GPC). Parameters related to macronutrients contained in these serum lots were then evaluated with the purpose of establishing their biochemical profiles. The results obtained can be considered as normal values for apparently healthy animal donors. Fluctuations found between the data of this investigation and those mentioned in the literature for certain biochemical parameters are probably due to the methodology employed, the breed and age of the animals, or even to regional diet. Student's "t" test was applied for the statistical analysis of the results and demonstrated that, as far as serum fractions were concerned, no significant differences occurred between sera rated as good and poor cell growth promoters, taking t c= 2.45. For calf sera from animals above and below six months of age, two tests relating to alfa and beta fractions were significant (t=2.68 and 2.61 respectively). It was demonstrated that the evaluation of the biochemical parameters mentioned "per se" neither leads to the identification of calf sera presentig good or poor GPC, nor of sera harvested from calves younger or older than six months

Comparison of equations for the calculation of LDL-cholesterol in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND : The Friedewald equation is widely used to calculate LDL-C for cardiovascular risk prediction but is less accurate with comorbidities and extreme lipid values. Several novel formulae have been reported to outperform the Friedewald formula. METHODS : We examined 14,219 lipid profiles and evaluated four formulae (Friedewald, Chen, de Cordova, Hattori) and compared these to direct measurement of LDL-C across various triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) ranges using Beckman reagents and instruments. Linear regression and ROC analysis were performed. RESULTS : The de Cordova formula showed a high correlation with directly measured LDL-C (r= 0.90, P b 0.001), comparable to the Friedewald calculated values for directly measured LDL-C (r = 0.95, P b 0.001). The de Cordova formula was favorable in some ranges of HDL, TC and the lowest TG range (r = 0.97, P b 0.001) but performed least well in comparison with the three other LDL-C calculations (AUC=0.8331), demonstrating inconsistent bias. The Chen formula performed better than Friedewald (AUC = 0.9049). The Hattori formula outperformed all formulae including Friedewald over various ranges of lipid values (AUC= 0.9097). CONCLUSIONS : We observe favorable correlations of the de Cordova formula with Friedewald at low TG values. However, the Hattori formula appears to be best for application in hospitalized patients, even at extreme lipid values.http://www.elsevier.com/locate/clinchim2016-04-30hb201

Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnostic work-up of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (PICUS): study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) remains a dilemma for physicians as it is uncertain whether patients with IAP may actually have an occult aetiology. It is unclear to what extent additional diagnostic modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are warranted after a first episode of IAP in order to uncover this aetiology. Failure to timely determine treatable aetiologies delays appropriate treatment and might subsequently cause recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Therefore, the aim of the Pancreatitis of Idiopathic origin: Clinical added value of endoscopic UltraSonography (PICUS) Study is to determine the value of routine EUS in determining the aetiology of pancreatitis in patients with a first episode of IAP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PICUS is designed as a multicentre prospective cohort study of 106 patients with a first episode of IAP after complete standard diagnostic work-up, in whom a diagnostic EUS will be performed. Standard diagnostic work-up will include a complete personal and family history, laboratory tests including serum alanine aminotransferase, calcium and triglyceride levels and imaging by transabdominal ultrasound

2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

[No abstract available

Effect of Early Surgery vs Endoscopy-First Approach on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis The ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE For patients with painful chronic pancreatitis, surgical treatment is postponed until medical and endoscopic treatment have failed. Observational studies have suggested that earlier surgery could mitigate disease progression, providing better pain control and preserving pancreatic function.OBJECTIVE To determine whether early surgery is more effective than the endoscopy-first approach in terms of clinical outcomes.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The ESCAPE trial was an unblinded, multicenter, randomized clinical superiority trial involving 30 Dutch hospitals participating in the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. From April 2011 until September 2016, a total of 88 patients with chronic pancreatitis, a dilated main pancreatic duct, and who only recently started using prescribed opioids for severe pain (strong opioids for <= 2 months or weak opioids for <= 6 months) were included. The 18-month follow-up period ended in March 2018.INTERVENTIONS There were 44 patients randomized to the early surgery group who underwent pancreatic drainage surgery within 6 weeks after randomization and 44 patients randomized to the endoscopy-first approach group who underwent medical treatment, endoscopy including lithotripsy if needed, and surgery if needed.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was pain, measured on the Izbicki pain score and integrated over 18 months (range, 0-100 [increasing score indicates more pain severity]). Secondary outcomes were pain relief at the end of follow-up; number of interventions, complications, hospital admissions; pancreatic function; quality of life (measured on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]); and mortality.RESULTS Among 88 patients who were randomized (mean age, 52 years; 21 (24%) women), 85 (97%) completed the trial. During 18 months of follow-up, patients in the early surgery group had a lower Izbicki pain score than patients in the group randomized to receive the endoscopy-first approach group (37 vs 49; between-group difference, -12 points [95% CI, -22 to -2]; P = .02). Complete or partial pain relief at end of follow-up was achieved in 23 of 40 patients (58%) in the early surgery vs 16 of 41 (39%)in the endoscopy-first approach group (P = .10). The total number of interventions was lower in the early surgery group (median, 1 vs 3; P < .001). Treatment complications (27% vs 25%), mortality (0% vs 0%), hospital admissions, pancreatic function, and quality of life were not significantly different between early surgery and the endoscopy-first approach.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with chronic pancreatitis, early surgery compared with an endoscopy-first approach resulted in lower pain scores when integrated over 18 months. However, further research is needed to assess persistence of differences over time and to replicate the study findings.Transplant surger