Biliogastrointestinal reconstruction with duodenectomy and pancreas preservation by laparoscopy after open failed coledocoduodenostomy

Las lesiones de la vía biliar y las reconstrucciones biliodigestivas son un reto quirúrgico para el cirujano, además de una situación que exige su máxima habilidad y conocimiento. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con una reconstrucción biliodigestiva por una lesión de vía biliar abierta la cual fue fallida. Se decide llevar a reconstrucción biliodigestiva por laparoscopia, con preservación del páncreas, en un asa con hepatoyeyunostomía y gastroyeyunostomía. Este caso ilustra la posibilidad del manejo con cirugía mínimamente invasiva incluso en los casos más graves; sin embargo, se requiere alta experticia al momento de abordarlo.Bile duct injury and bile duct reconstruction are a surgical challenge for the surgeon, in addition to a situation that demands maximum skill and knowledge. We present a case of a patient with a biliodigestive reconstruction due to an open bile duct injury which was failed, it was decided to take a biliodigestive reconstruction by laparoscopy, with preservation of the pancreas, with hepaticoyejunostomy and gastroyejunostomy. This case illustrates the possibility of handling with minimally invasive surgery even in the most severe cases, however, they require high expertise when addressing it

Management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: A challenge for the general surgeon

Introducción. El aneurisma aórtico abdominal roto, tiene una mortalidad del 80 % al 90 %. Para su reparación existe una técnica abierta y otra endovascular, las cuales tienen diferencias entre sus beneficios y complicaciones. El método de elección en la actualidad para la corrección de esta alteración anatómica es endovascular, sin embargo, no es el más usado, porque no se cuenta todo el tiempo con el equipo humano de cirugía vascular para su realización. Caso clínico. Ingresa a urgencias un paciente en estado de shock de origen desconocido, con dolor abdominal de 24 horas de evolución. Se realiza una tomografía con contraste que demuestra un aneurisma aórtico abdominal infrarrenal roto. Debido a que no se contaba con el equipo de cirugía vascular, es llevado de urgencia a una corrección abierta que duró 153 minutos, con un sangrado intraoperatorio de 1754 cc. Fue dado de alta a los 12 días postoperatorios sin ninguna complicación. Discusión. La reparación endovascular del aneurisma aórtico abdominal roto es la mejor elección, ya que muestra mayores beneficios en comparación con la reparación abierta, sin embargo, no es el más utilizado, porque se necesita de un personal bien entrenado en cirugía endovascular, por lo que, dentro de la formación de los cirujanos generales, se tiene que incluir el aprendizaje de las técnicas abiertas.Introduction. The ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has a mortality of 80% to 90%. There is an open and an endovascular techniques for its repair, which have differences between their benefits and complications. The method of choice for the correction of this anatomical alteration is endovascular; however, it is not the most frequently used, mainly because the vascular surgical team is not available all the time to perform it. Clinical case. A patient in a state of shock of unknown origin was admitted to the emergency room, with abdominal pain of 24 hours of evolution. A contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrated a ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Due to the lack of a vascular surgery team, the patient was rushed for an open surgery that lasted 153 minutes, with an intraoperative bleeding of 1754 cc. He was discharged 12 days after surgery without any complications. Discussion. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is the best choice, since it shows greater benefits compared to open repair. However, it is not the most widely used because it requires well-trained personnel in endovascular surgery. Therefore, learning of open techniques must be included in the training of general surgeons

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to programed surgery but also emergencies and those following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Objectives and aims: Describe and compare clinical and surgical results of the laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure using a 3-port vs multiport approach. Materials and methods: We present a multicentric comparative study of 197 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure following failed (ERCP to extract CBD stones; 104 patients were managed by three-port vs 93 multiport laparoscopic surgery in five centers of Bogotá, Colombia, between 2013 and 2017 with follow-up of 1 year. Results: A total of 197 patients were taken to laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure, 104 patients via three-port technique and 93 patients via multiport. All (100%) the patients had previously failed ERCP. The average surgical time on the three-port approach was 106 minutes vs 123 minutes on multiport. Only in the multiport technique we had an average conversion of 2%. Mean hospital stay of 2.5 days, less for the three-port approach vs multiport in 5–7 days. There was a need of reintervention in 1% of the patients who underwent three-port exploration. Conclusion: Postoperative pain, use of an additional port, complication rates, operation time, and cost of the three-port technique were similar to those of the conventional approach. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the true benefits of the three-port technique

Low cost devices to reduce aerosol effect during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in COVID-19

Los procedimientos endoscópicos, al estar asociados a la exposición de la vía aérea superior, tienen un mayor riesgo de transmisión del virus SARS-CoV-2; por esta razón, es necesario el planteamiento de in-tervenciones para atenuar o eliminar la exposición a éste. En este artículo nos permitimos presentar una estrategia de mitigación de bajo costo, ya que con el progreso de la pandemia se podría estar en un estado de austeridad de recursos económicos, lo cual haría estos dispositivos totalmente válidos.Endoscopic procedures, as they are associated with exposure of the upper airway, have a higher risk of transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; so, it is necessary to consider interventions to mitigate or eliminate ex-posure to it. In this article, we allow ourselves to present a low-cost mitigation strategy, since with the progress of the pandemic it could be in a state of austerity of economic resources, making these devices totally valid

Laparoscopic choledochal cyst resection with simplified common bile duct reconstruction in an adult population: A case series

Introducción: Los quistes de colédoco (CC) son una patología congénita poco frecuente en la población adulta. Desde 1995, el manejo laparoscópico ha sido descrito para esta entidad. Sin embargo, su manejo se considera un tema controvertido debido al aumento del riesgo de colangiocarcinoma. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, observacional y descriptivo considerando pacientes diagnosticados de CC que fueron operados en un centro de referencia de cirugía hepatobiliar desde enero de 2013 hasta junio de 2018. Los pacientes fueron llevados a laparoscopia simplificada hepaticoyeyunostomía con reconstrucción en Y de Roux. Se presenta un análisis retrospectivo de los datos obtenidos. Resultados: Diez pacientes adultos con CC fueron sometidos a reconstrucción biliar quirúrgica a una edad media de 34,5 años; 75% tenía CC Todani tipo I y 25% Todani tipo IV-B CC. Aproximadamente el 50% de los pacientes fueron diagnosticados mediante colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) y el 50% de ellos mediante colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética. Ninguno requirió reintervención, no se informó mortalidad; y la estancia media en el hospital fue 5 días, ningún paciente tuvo fuga biliar posoperatoria, ninguno se convirtió a cirugía abierta y todos los pacientes tuvieron una tolerancia adecuada a la alimentación oral 2 días postoperatorios. El seguimiento a largo plazo no mostró incidencia de colangiocarcinoma después de un seguimiento de 2 años. Conclusión: Los quistes de colédoco en adultos son una patología poco frecuente que tiene una alta probabilidad de desarrollar malignidad cuando no se realiza de forma adecuada quirúrgicamente manejado y debido al reflujo biliar secundario. Estos factores hacen que el manejo quirúrgico sea una decisión crítica. El abordaje laparoscópico simplificado presentado en este trabajo parece ser una alternativa eficaz y segura a la cirugía reconstructiva de la vía biliar.Introduction: Choledochal cysts (CC) are rare congenital pathology in adult population. Since 1995, laparoscopic management has been described for this entity. Nevertheless, its management is considered to be a controversial matter due to the augmented risk of associated cholangiocarcinoma. Materials and methods: A retrospective, observational, and descriptive study was conducted considering patients diagnosed with CC who were operated at a hepatobiliary surgery referral center from January 2013 to June 2018. Patients were taken to simplified laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction. A retrospective analysis of the data obtained is presented. Results: Ten adult patients with CC underwent surgical biliary reconstruction at a mean age of 34.5 years; 75% had Todani type I CC and 25% Todani type IV-B CC. About 50% of the patients were diagnosed via endoscopic retrograde holangiopancreatography (ERCP) and 50% of them via magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. None required re-intervention, no mortality was reported; and the mean hospital stay was 5 days, no patient had postoperative biliary leakage, none was converted to open surgery, and all patients had adequate oral feeding tolerance 2 days postoperative. Long-term follow-up showed no incidence of cholangiocarcinoma after 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Choledochal cysts in adults is a rare pathology that has a high probability of developing malignancy when not adequately surgically managed and because of secondary bile reflux. These factors make surgical management a critical decision. The simplified laparoscopic approach presented in this paper seems to be an effective and safe alternative to biliary duct reconstructive surgery

Bull Horn Wounds in Rural Areas Importance of Preparation in Bullfighting Surgery: Case Report

Introducción. El trauma abdominal penetrante causado por embestida de asta de toro representa menos del 3%. Son heridas que deben ser consideradas sucias, y la primera causa de muerte por este tipo de trauma es el shock hipovolémico. Presentación de caso. Se presenta el caso de un hombre de 60 años con trauma abdominal penetrante por asta de toro en flanco izquierdo e hipogastrio de 18x8 cm de extensión, con evisceración aguda traumática. Fue llevado a laparotomía exploratoria, donde no se evidenciaron lesiones de órganos sólidos ni de vísceras huecas. El paciente evolucionó sin complicaciones. Discusión. Las heridas por asta de toro dadas sus características son consideradas sucias y alcanzan hasta un 50% de infección. Dentro de su manejo inicial se deben incluir antibióticos y abordajes quirúrgicos, según cada caso. Conclusión. El trauma abdominal penetrante causado por embestida de asta de toro es un mecanismo poco frecuente; sin embargo, los cirujanos deben estar entrenados para tratar o no de manera quirúrgica a este tipo de pacientes.Introduction. Penetrating abdominal trauma caused by bull horn ramming represents less than 3%. These are wounds that should be considered dirty, and the leading cause of death from this type of trauma is hypovolemic shock. Case Presentation. A 60-year-old man with penetrating abdominal trauma by bull horn in the left flank and hypogastrium, 18x8 cm in extension, with acute traumatic evisceration. He was taken to exploratory laparotomy, where no solid organ or hollow viscera lesions were evidenced. The patient evolved without complications. Discussion. Given their characteristics, bull horn wounds are considered dirty and have an infection rate of up to 50%. Initial management should include antibiotics and surgical approaches, according to each case. Conclusion. Penetrating abdominal trauma caused by bull horn ramming is an infrequent mechanism; however, surgeons must be trained to treat or not to treat this type of patient surgically

Evolving trends in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 waves. The ACIE appy II study

Background: In 2020, ACIE Appy study showed that COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) worldwide, with an increased rate of non-operative management (NOM) strategies and a trend toward open surgery due to concern of virus transmission by laparoscopy and controversial recommendations on this issue. The aim of this study was to survey again the same group of surgeons to assess if any difference in management attitudes of AA had occurred in the later stages of the outbreak. Methods: From August 15 to September 30, 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to all 709 participants of the ACIE Appy study. The questionnaire included questions on personal protective equipment (PPE), local policies and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection, NOM, surgical approach and disease presentations in 2021. The results were compared with the results from the previous study. Results: A total of 476 answers were collected (response rate 67.1%). Screening policies were significatively improved with most patients screened regardless of symptoms (89.5% vs. 37.4%) with PCR and antigenic test as the preferred test (74.1% vs. 26.3%). More patients tested positive before surgery and commercial systems were the preferred ones to filter smoke plumes during laparoscopy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the first option in the treatment of AA, with a declined use of NOM. Conclusion: Management of AA has improved in the last waves of pandemic. Increased evidence regarding SARS-COV-2 infection along with a timely healthcare systems response has been translated into tailored attitudes and a better care for patients with AA worldwide

Apendicitis aguda por migración de dispositivo intrauterino con obstrucción del apéndice cecal: reporte de casos y revisión de la literatura

Introduction The intrauterine device is a planning method widely used in the world, however, it is not without complications, one of these is uterine perforation and migration of the IUD to the abdominal cavity, which although it is rare, has serious clinical repercussions and its study has been studied. relationship with the adequate or not insertion of the device, the size and configuration of the uterus, uterine anomalies or surgeries and the moment of insertion after delivery. Case report We present the case of a 36-year-old female patient with a 12-hour history of pain in the mesogastrium that radiates to the right iliac fossa of 9/10 weight intensity, associated with fever measured at 38.9º. He underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with a finding of acute appendicitis secondary to lumen obstruction by the IUD, so an appendectomy was performed. Conclusions The appropriate treatment when this complication occurs is surgical extraction either laparoscopically or laparotomy to reduce the risk of associated complications.  Introducción El dispositivo intrauterino es un método de planificación muy usado en el mundo,sin embargo no está exento de  complicaciones una de esta es la perforación uterina y migración del DIU a la cavidad abdominal que aunque es poco frecuente tiene graves repercusiones clínicas y se ha estudiado su relación con la adecuada o no inserción del dispositivo, el tamaño y configuración del útero, las anomalías o cirugías uterinas y el momento de la inserción tras el parto. Reporte de caso Presentamos el caso de una paciente femenina de 36 años con cuadro de 12 horas de evolución consistente en dolor en mesogastrio que se irradia a fosa iliaca derecha de intensidad 9/10 tipo peso, asociado a fiebre cuantificada en 38.9º. Se sometió a laparoscopia diagnóstica con hallazgo de apendicitis aguda secundaria a obstrucción del lumen por DIU por lo que se realiza apendicectomía. Conclusión El tratamiento adecuado cuando se presenta esta complicación, es la extracción quirúrgica ya sea por vía laparoscópica o laparotomía para disminuir el riesgo complicaciones asociadas.

Acute abdomen in the centanary patient, mesh migration into the sigmoid colon after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): A case report and review of literature

Background The complications induced by mesh, such as foreign body reaction, deep-seated infection, mesh migration and perforation into viscera, have been reported sporadically. Colon erosion and penetration by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair mesh can possibly cause perforation of the colon with acute abdomen. Case presentation A 100-year-old male, who underwent 4 years ago TAPP repair of left inguinal, presented to the emergency department with acute abdomen due to chronic mesh penetration into the sigmoid colon, the migrating mesh generated a free wall perforation with generalized fecal peritonitis. Discussion Tailoring the mesh, appropriate suture placement and adherence to principles of antisepsis during hernia repair surgery are crucial in avoiding longterm mesh-related complications. Conclusion TAPP is a safe procedure for treat groin hernias, unless, mesh complications like foreign body reaction, deep-seated infection, mesh migration and perforation

Surgery during the SARS-COV-2 / COVID-19 pandemic : the effect of particle aerosol generation on surgical scenarios

Hasta el momento no se ha publicado información conclusiva que respalde la teoría de que los virus respiratorios se transmitan a través del humo quirúrgico o el neumoperitoneo. Por lo tanto, las alertas sobre los riesgos de la laparoscopia emitidas durante las primeras semanas de la pandemia deben ser analizadas con precaución y a la luz de la evidencia cambiante sobre el tema. Tanto la cirugía abierta como la laparoscópica tienen el potencial de generar aerosoles de partículas y por lo tanto, en ambos escenarios es fundamental la protección de todo el equipo de trabajo dentro del quirófano. En todos los procedimientos durante la época de pandemia, se deben buscar las estrategias más efectivas para controlar las potenciales fuentes de trasmisión y minimizar la exposición del personal en los momentos de mayor riesgo, relacionados con el manejo de la vía aérea y las cavidades del paciente. La siguiente es una revisión narrativa de literatura sobre las cirugías durante la pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 y el efecto de los aerosoles durante estos procedimientos, con el fin de integrar y dar a conocer las principales medidas que se han propuesto a nivel global, para manejar este nuevo grupo de pacientes.Revista Nacional - No indexad