Small Change: Economics and the British coin-tree

This is the accepted manuscript for the following article: Ceri Houlbrook, “Small Change: Economics and the British coin-tree”, Post Medieval Archaeology, Vol. 49(1), June 2015. The final published version can be found at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/0079423615Z.00000000074 © Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology 2015Throughout the c.2000 year period coins have been circulated in Britain, they have also been ritually employed, most notably as votive deposits. Focusing specifically on the understudied custom of the British coin-tree, whereby coins are ritually embedded into the barks of trees, this paper considers the coin’s role and applicability as a deposit. It aims to demonstrate that our understanding of the coin’s past, present, and future ritual employment is not only aided by a consideration of economics and the coin’s secular function; it would be utterly incomplete without it.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio

The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK

In recent years, resistance to the benzimidazole (BZ) and tetrahydropyrimidine (PYR) anthelmintics in global cyathostomin populations, has led to reliance on the macrocyclic lactone drugs (ML-of which ivermectin and moxidectin are licensed in horses) to control these parasites. Recently, the first confirmed case of resistance to both ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX) was reported in the USA in yearlings imported from Ireland. This suggests that ML resistance in cyathostomins has emerged, and raises the possibility that regular movement of horses may result in rapid spread of ML resistant cyathostomins. Resistance may go undetected due to a lack of surveillance for ML efficacy. Here, we report anthelmintic efficacies in cyathostomins infecting UK Thoroughbreds on four studs. Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were performed to define resistance (resistance = FECR <95% lower credible interval (LCI) < 90%). Stud A yearlings had FECRs of 36.4–78.6% (CI:15.7–86.3) after three IVM treatments, 72.6% (CI: 50.8–85.2) after MOX, and 80.8% (CI: 61.9–90.0) after PYR. Mares on stud A had a FECR of 97.8% (CI: 93.3–99.9) and 98% (95.1–99.4) after IVM and MOX treatment, respectively. Resistance to MLs was not found in yearlings or mares on studs B, C or D with FECR after MOX OR IVM treatment ranging from 99.8 to 99.9% (95.4–100); although yearlings on studs B, C and D all had an egg reappearance period (ERP) of six weeks for MOX and stud C had a four-week ERP for IVM. This study describes the first confirmed case of resistance to both licensed ML drugs on a UK Thoroughbred stud and highlights the urgent need for a) increased awareness of the threat of ML resistant parasites infecting horses, and b) extensive surveillance of ML efficacy against cyathostomin populations in the UK, to gauge the extent of the problem

Stability and resilience of ecological systems; the implications for environmental management Part K; environmental policy

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre- DSC:85/36915(Stability) / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo