59 research outputs found

    Exhibitionary Complex : Architecture as an Exhibit

    Get PDF
    Within this research, the exhibitions are considered primarily as institutions, and as a place of interaction among different identities through choice of exhibits, their presentation, spatial layout and the selection and use of the accompanying texts. The context of the research thus put into place will attempt to answer the question of how it is possible to construct a history of the exhibitions – which are forgotten, often without sufficient documentation or records about them. In addition, it will be reconsidered in which manner the exhibitions helped to create and promote the idea of architecture during the 20th century, overlapping with the shifting of discourses, broader philosophical debates and technological innovations

    Urban Narratives

    Get PDF
    Diverging notions of what is meant with and under narrative(s), it’s (their) function and use has been in the centre of research and practical attention in previous years especially regarding the narrative and rhetorical structure of urban theory, planning and design. The concept of narrative is ’’borrowed’’ from literary theory, where notion of narratology is commonly described as the study of narrative structure, looking at what narratives have in common and what makes one different from another

    IzloΕΎbeni potencijal nacionalnih paviljona na svetskim i bijenalnim izloΕΎbama

    Get PDF
    By examining the role of exhibition pavilions with a particular focus on the World Fairs and the Venice Biennale (including visual arts and architecture), questions arise as to the nature and importance of the pavilions as a specific type of architectural objects. Having in mind that contemporary pavilions could be considered as architecture items or installations, boundaries between these two are questioned within this research. At what exact moment does something cease to be an architectural space in the classical sense of the term to become an art project? Pavilions are examined both as exhibition spaces hosting the content, and the content itself. Most probably the answer is somewhere in between and the pavilions are both exhibition spaces and the exhibits per se. They are very often small scale in size but are very important in idea.Tradicija izlaganja u okviru nacionalnih paviljona, koja je uspostavljenja na izloΕΎbama iz 19. veka nastavljena je i danas u okviru Svetskih izloΕΎbi ('Expo'') i Bijenala u Veneciji. U radu Δ‡e biti razmatrana uloga i značaj paviljona kao zasebne tipoloΕ‘ke kategorije u arhitekturi, kao i njegova instrumentalizacija na pomenutim manifestacijama. Paviljoni Δ‡e biti razmatrani kao mesta izlaganja, i kao autonomni objekti koji kroz svoju formu i oblikovanje imaju hibridnu ulogu da govore o arhitekturi, umetnosti i nacionalnom identitetu. Uz istorijat paviljona, od prateΔ‡e scenografije do samostalnog objekta, biΔ‡e razmatrana i njihova pozicija u institucionalnom okviru svetskih izloΕΎbi i Bijenala u Veneciji. U radu Δ‡e se razmatrati i dve koncepcije paviljona - kao privremenih struktura (svetske izloΕΎbe) i trajnih prostora za izlaganje (Bijenale) i posledica ovakve podele na arhitekturu paviljona

    Cultural Identity

    Get PDF
    Cultural identity is most certainly sociologically and ideologically constructed and in most cases it is part of person’s self-conception and self-perception that is linked with nationality, ethnicity, religion, social or cultural class, or any other kind of particular group or identity. The concept of identity is ambiguous and it relates with the construction of a shared narrative that defines a community and differentiates them from others. At the same time culture provides diverse ways of interpreting the environment and the world, and given that identity explains and interprets the structure of the relationship between man, community and society, it can be said that identity is a kind of social mechanism of labelling and conceptualization that applies to individuals and groups and society as a whole

    Conservation-restoration works on ceramic dolia from the site of Krvavići-Boőkina

    Get PDF
    U ovom radu bit Δ‡e prezentirani konzervatorsko-restauratorski radovi na dolijama koje potječu iz I.- II. stoljeΔ‡a, a pronaΔ‘ene su tijekom istraΕΎivanja djelatnika Hrvatskog restauratorskog zavoda na lokalitetu KrvaviΔ‡i-BoΕ‘kina. Dolije su keramičke posude velikih dimenzija koje se najčeΕ‘Δ‡e veΕΎu uz gospodarske objekte. SluΕΎile su za skladiΕ‘tenje hrane i tekuΔ‡ina, a upotrebljavale su se joΕ‘ od helenističkog razdoblja. Te su posude izraΔ‘ivane na nekoliko načina. Treba istaknuti rad uz pomoΔ‡ drvenog kalupa te izradu uz pomoΔ‡ cjevasto oblikovanih komada gline koji su slagani jedan na drugi. Konzervatorsko-restauratorski radovi na tim predmetima bili su zahtjevan projekt, iako predmeti nisu u cijelosti rekonstruirani. Nakon razvrstavanja, fragmenti su mehanički očiΕ‘Δ‡eni od naslaga zemlje i kalcitnih naslaga. PovrΕ‘inskom impregnacijom nije se postigao zadovoljavajuΔ‡i učinak stabilizacije keramičkih ulomaka, pa su zato svi fragmenti impregnirani u vakuumskoj komori, za Ε‘to se koristila otopina polivinil-acetata u acetonu. Uslijedilo je spajanje fragmenata lijepljenjem uz pomoΔ‡ armatura radi osiguravanja stabilnosti posude, te rekonstrukcija nedostajuΔ‡ih dijelova gipsom i na kraju toniranje gipsanih integracija. BuduΔ‡i da predmeti nisu rekonstruirani u svojim izvornim dimenzijama, idealne rekonstrukcije napravljene su na osnovi analogija sličnih posuda uz pomoΔ‡ računalnih programa.The paper presents the conservation-restoration works on dolia, dating from the 1st-2nd c., which were discovered on the site of KrvaviΔ‡i-BoΕ‘kina during explorations carried out by the staff of the Croatian Conservation Institute. Dolia are large earthenware containers, used mostly on farms. Their function was that of foodstuffs and liquid storage, and they had been in use since the Hellenistic period. Containers of this kind were produced in several ways, of note among which are manufacture with a wooden mould, and formation from tube-shaped pieces of clay that were placed on top of one another. The conservation and restoration of these items were very demanding, although the artefacts have not been fully reconstructed. First of all, the fragments were classified and mechanically cleaned of dirt and calcareous sediment. The surface impregnation did not result in a satisfactory stabilization of pottery shards, which is why all the shards were impregnated in a vacuum chamber, with a solution of polyvinyl acetate in acetone being used. Thereafter the shards were glued together with the assistance of reinforcements, aimed at securing the stability of the container, and the missing parts were reconstructed from gypsum, and finally toned. Since the dolia have not been reconstructed in their original dimensions, ideal reconstructions were made on the basis of analogies with similar containers, with the help of computer programs

    Velika ili mala razmera - tipologija arhitektonskih izložbi održanih u Jugoslaviji (SFRJ) i njihov danaőnji značaj

    Get PDF
    With the notion that exhibitions, independently of their format or content, can always be considered as both discursive and visual platforms for the study of specific time periods, this research will provide an insight into a possible typology of architecture exhibitions that were organised socialist Yugoslavia between 1945 and 1991. The exhibitions in question were considered as collective activities, and they provide an insight into a wider context of social, economic, political and cultural events in Yugoslavia after World War Two as well as the status that architecture as practice held within them. Having in mind that we speak about various exhibitions with a large number of parameters according to which they were similar or different, this paper will point out the process of forming an exhibition typology in order to enable the classification for their systematic study. A specific study will be used to create the typology that will be applied in the process of researching the architectural exhibitions, their role and importance at the specific range in the specific time period.S obzirom na to da se izloΕΎbe, nezavisno od svog formata ili sadrΕΎaja, uvek mogu smatrati i diskurzivnom i vizuelnom platformom za proučavanje odreΔ‘enih vremenskih perioda, ovo istraΕΎivanje Δ‡e dati uvid u moguΔ‡u tipologiju izloΕΎbi arhitekture koje su organizovane u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji izmeΔ‘u 1945. i 1991. godine. Predmetne izloΕΎbe su posmatrane kao kolektivna aktivnost, čija analiza omoguΔ‡ava uvid u Ε‘iri kontekst druΕ‘tvenih, ekonomskih, političkih i kulturnih deΕ‘avanja u Jugoslaviji posle Drugog svetskog rata, kao i status koji je arhitektura kao praksa imala u njima. ImajuΔ‡i u vidu da se govori o različitim izloΕΎbama, sa velikim brojem parametara po kojima su bile slične ili različite, u ovom radu Δ‡e se ukazati na proces formiranja izloΕΎbene tipologije, kako bi se omoguΔ‡ila klasifikacija za njihovo sistematsko proučavanje. U posebnoj studiji Δ‡e biti uraΔ‘ena tipologija koja Δ‡e se primenjivati u procesu istraΕΎivanja arhitektonskih izloΕΎbi, njihove uloge i značaja na odreΔ‘enom rasponu u odreΔ‘enom vremenskom periodu

    ИзлоТбСнС праксС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ Ρƒ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ˜ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΈ простор ΠΎΠ΄ 1945. Π΄ΠΎ 1991.

    Get PDF
    The subject of the proposed research are architecture exhibitions that were organized within the framework of socialist Yugoslavia in the period after the Second World War. Having in mind the growing number of researches that are related to architectural exhibitions, as a special form of manifestations on a global scale from one, and researches relating to the history of socialist Yugoslavia, with a special emphasis on architecture and urbanism, on the other side, exhibitions in question are considered as collective activities whose research allows insight into the broader context of social, economic, political and cultural events within the post-war Yugoslavia, and the status that architecture has had within them. The focus of the research is on the potential of the exhibition to be part, and at the same time to shape the discourse of architecture primarily as a place of debate between the architectural profession and the public, or as a place of promotion or criticism of ideas within the domain of architecture. Architectural exhibitions will be seen as a cause, but also as a consequence of certain changes and developments in a wider social, cultural, political and economic context. Defined in this way, the framework of the proposed research allows additional research and analysis of topics of exhibition practice in the domain of architecture, as well as the modalities of post-war architecture in Yugoslavia. During the discussion of exhibition practices, the exhibitions are not analyzed as isolated events of the presentation of architectural works in certain periods of socialist Yugoslavia, but as a framework for production, reception and evaluation of architecture, through analysis of the entire process of organization of exhibitions, selection criteria, thematic framework and place of exibiting. By researching the exhibitions of architecture created within socialist Yugoslavia at all stages of its existence, as a larger interdependent system, phenomena and changes within the theory and practice of architecture can be monitored, which can show us the status of architecture in the Yugoslav society and what it was like her role within the Yugoslav cultural space.ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° су ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ којС су ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ Π”Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠ³ свСтског Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°. Π˜ΠΌΠ°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈ Ρƒ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρƒ свС Π²Π΅Ρ›ΠΈ Π±Ρ€ΠΎΡ˜ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° која сС односС Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ посСбну Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡƒ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ„Π΅ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π½ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡƒ са јСднС, ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° која сС односС Π½Π° ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, са посСбним нагласком Π½Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρƒ ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΠΌ који су настали Π½Π° Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ простору, са Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³Π΅ странС, ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ су Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ активности Ρ‡ΠΈΡ˜ΠΎΠΌ сС Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ›Π°Π²Π° ΡƒΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ Ρƒ ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΈ контСкст Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ…, Скономских, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ… дСшавања Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ Π”Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠ³ свСтског Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°, ΠΈ статуса који јС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»Π° Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ ΡšΠΈΡ…. Ѐокус ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° јС Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Ρƒ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±ΠΈ Π΄Π° истоврСмСно Π±ΡƒΠ΄Ρƒ Π΄Π΅ΠΎ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ дискурс Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ првСнствСно ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ мСсто Π΄Π΅Π±Π°Ρ‚Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ архитСктонскС струкС ΠΈ Ρ˜Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ, односно ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ мСсто ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ идСја Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅. ИзлоТбС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ Π±ΠΈΡ›Π΅ посматранС ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡƒΠ·Ρ€ΠΎΠΊ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ послСдица ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π΅Ρ’Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈ дСшавања Ρƒ ΡˆΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΌ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Скономском контСксту. ДСфинисан Π½Π° овај Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½, ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ›Π°Π²Π° Π΄Π° сС Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ… пракси Ρƒ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρƒ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ послСратнС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ Ρƒ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ, Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ истраТС ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ… пракси, ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ сС Π½Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ’Π°Ρ˜ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ архитСктонских Π΄Π΅Π»Π° Ρƒ појСдиним Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ™ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, Π²Π΅Ρ› ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡšΡƒ, Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΠΈ Π΅Π²Π°Π»ΡƒΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρƒ Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ процСса ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±ΠΈ, ΡƒΠΊΡ™ΡƒΡ‡ΡƒΡ˜ΠΈΡ›ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡƒΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, тСматски ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ ΠΈ мСсто ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²Π°ΡšΠ°. ΠŸΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, насталих Ρƒ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΡ˜ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ Ρƒ свим Ρ„Π°Π·Π°ΠΌΠ° њСног ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ Π²Π΅Ρ›Π΅Π³ мСђузависног систСма, ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ сС ΠΏΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ појавС ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅ Ρƒ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ ΠΈ пракси Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, којС Π½Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ°Π² јС статус ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° Ρƒ Ρ˜ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π²Ρƒ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²Π° јС Π±ΠΈΠ»Π° њСна ΡƒΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π° Ρƒ Ρ˜ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΌ простору

    Exhibitionary practices of architecture in Yugoslavia and Yugoslav cultural space from 1945 to 1991.

    Get PDF
    ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° су ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ којС су ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ Π”Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠ³ свСтског Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°. Π˜ΠΌΠ°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈ Ρƒ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρƒ свС Π²Π΅Ρ›ΠΈ Π±Ρ€ΠΎΡ˜ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° која сС односС Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ посСбну Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡƒ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ„Π΅ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π½ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡƒ са јСднС, ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° која сС односС Π½Π° ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, са посСбним нагласком Π½Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρƒ ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΠΌ који су настали Π½Π° Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ простору, са Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³Π΅ странС, ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ су Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π΅ активности Ρ‡ΠΈΡ˜ΠΎΠΌ сС Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ›Π°Π²Π° ΡƒΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ Ρƒ ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΈ контСкст Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ…, Скономских, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ… дСшавања Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ Π”Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠ³ свСтског Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°, ΠΈ статуса који јС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»Π° Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ ΡšΠΈΡ…. Ѐокус ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° јС Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Ρƒ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±ΠΈ Π΄Π° истоврСмСно Π±ΡƒΠ΄Ρƒ Π΄Π΅ΠΎ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΡƒΡ˜Ρƒ дискурс Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ првСнствСно ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ мСсто Π΄Π΅Π±Π°Ρ‚Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ архитСктонскС струкС ΠΈ Ρ˜Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ, односно ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ мСсто ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ идСја Ρƒ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€Ρƒ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅. ИзлоТбС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ Π±ΠΈΡ›Π΅ посматранС ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡƒΠ·Ρ€ΠΎΠΊ, Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ послСдица ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€Π΅Ρ’Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈ дСшавања Ρƒ ΡˆΠΈΡ€Π΅ΠΌ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Скономском контСксту. ДСфинисан Π½Π° овај Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½, ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ›Π°Π²Π° Π΄Π° сС Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ… пракси Ρƒ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρƒ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ послСратнС Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅ Ρƒ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ, Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ истраТС ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΡšΠ° ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ… пракси, ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±Π΅ сС Π½Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ˜Ρƒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ’Π°Ρ˜ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ архитСктонских Π΄Π΅Π»Π° Ρƒ појСдиним Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ™ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ΅ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, Π²Π΅Ρ› ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡšΡƒ, Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΠΈ Π΅Π²Π°Π»ΡƒΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρƒ Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ процСса ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±ΠΈ, ΡƒΠΊΡ™ΡƒΡ‡ΡƒΡ˜ΠΈΡ›ΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡƒΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅, тСматски ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ€ ΠΈ мСсто ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²Π°ΡšΠ°. ΠŸΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ±ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, насталих Ρƒ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΎΡ˜ ΠˆΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ Ρƒ свим Ρ„Π°Π·Π°ΠΌΠ° њСног ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ Π²Π΅Ρ›Π΅Π³ мСђузависног систСма, ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ сС ΠΏΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ појавС ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅ Ρƒ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ ΠΈ пракси Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π΅, којС Π½Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ°Π² јС статус ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»Π° Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° Ρƒ Ρ˜ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΡ‚Π²Ρƒ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²Π° јС Π±ΠΈΠ»Π° њСна ΡƒΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π° Ρƒ Ρ˜ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΌ простору.The subject of the proposed research are architecture exhibitions that were organized within the framework of socialist Yugoslavia in the period after the Second World War. Having in mind the growing number of researches that are related to architectural exhibitions, as a special form of manifestations on a global scale from one, and researches relating to the history of socialist Yugoslavia, with a special emphasis on architecture and urbanism, on the other side, exhibitions in question are considered as collective activities whose research allows insight into the broader context of social, economic, political and cultural events within the post-war Yugoslavia, and the status that architecture has had within them. The focus of the research is on the potential of the exhibition to be part, and at the same time to shape the discourse of architecture primarily as a place of debate between the architectural profession and the public, or as a place of promotion or criticism of ideas within the domain of architecture. Architectural exhibitions will be seen as a cause, but also as a consequence of certain changes and developments in a wider social, cultural, political and economic context. Defined in this way, the framework of the proposed research allows additional research and analysis of topics of exhibition practice in the domain of architecture, as well as the modalities of post-war architecture in Yugoslavia. During the discussion of exhibition practices, the exhibitions are not analyzed as isolated events of the presentation of architectural works in certain periods of socialist Yugoslavia, but as a framework for production, reception and evaluation of architecture, through analysis of the entire process of organization of exhibitions, selection criteria, thematic framework and place of exibiting. By researching the exhibitions of architecture created within socialist Yugoslavia at all stages of its existence, as a larger interdependent system, phenomena and changes within the theory and practice of architecture can be monitored, which can show us the status of architecture in the Yugoslav society and what it was like her role within the Yugoslav cultural space
    • …
    corecore