Renal Involvement in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Retrospective Analysis of 160 Patients

Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, clinicopathologic features, and outcome of renal involvement in a large cohort of patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS)

Addition of Azathioprine to Corticosteroids Does Not Benefit Patients with IgA Nephropathy

The optimal treatment for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains unknown. Some patients respond to corticosteroids, suggesting that more aggressive treatment may provide additional benefit. We performed a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial to determine whether adding azathioprine to steroids improves renal outcome. We randomly assigned 207 IgAN patients with creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dl and proteinuria ≥1.0 g/d to either (1) a 3-day pulse of methylprednisolone in months 1, 3, and 5 in addition to both oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg every other day and azathioprine 1.5 mg/kg per day for 6 months (n = 101, group 1) or (2) steroids alone on the same schedule (n = 106, group 2). The primary outcome was renal survival (time to 50% increase in plasma creatinine from baseline); secondary outcomes were changes in proteinuria over time and safety. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 13 patients in group 1 (12.9%, 95% CI 7.5 to 20.9%) and 12 patients in group 2 (11.3%, CI 6.5 to 18.9%) (P = 0.83). Five-year cumulative renal survival was similar between groups (88 versus 89%; P = 0.83). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that female gender, systolic BP, number of antihypertensive drugs, ACE inhibitor use, and proteinuria during follow-up predicted the risk of reaching the primary endpoint. Treatment significantly decreased proteinuria from 2.00 to 1.07 g/d during follow-up (P < 0.001) on average, with no difference between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent among those receiving azathioprine. In summary, adding low-dose azathioprine to corticosteroids for 6 months does not provide additional benefit to patients with IgAN and may increase the risk for adverse events

Retreatment regimen of rituximab monotherapy given at the relapse of severe HCV-related cryoglobulinemic vasculitis: Long-term follow up data of a randomized controlled multicentre study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety in the long term of a retreatment regimen with Rituximab (RTX) alone administered at clinical relapse in cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV)

Evaluation of Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) As Marker of Endothelial Damage in Allo-Transplanted Patients at High Risk of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD/SOS): The Cecinvod Study

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), also known as veno-occlusive disease (VOD), is a potentially fatal complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Identifying a predictive biomarker for VOD has been challenging. Since endothelial injury is considered one of the main pathogenic factors for VOD onset, with the CECinVOD prospective study we aimed to evaluate Circulating Endothelial Cells (CEC) in allo-transplanted patients (pts) at higher risk to develop VOD. From October 2020 to November 2022, 150 pts have been enrolled in the CECinVOD study from 11 Italian Bone Marrow Transplantation Units. All pts must be older than 18 years and undergoing myeloablative alloSCT. CECs were detected using the CellSearch system, the FDA-approved immunomagnetic selection approach incorporating ferrofluid nanoparticles (anti CD146) and fluorophore-labelled antibodies (anti CD105, CD45 and DAPI). CEC were defined as CD146+, CD105+, DAPI+ and CD45-. CEC were collected at the following timepoints: before conditioning regimen (T0), at the end of conditioning regimen and before alloSCT (T1), at the time of neutrophils engraftment (T2), and 7-10 days after engraftment (T3). In pts who developed VOD, additional timepoints were collected as follows: at any time of suspected or proven VOD onset (T4), and then weekly during Defibrotide treatment (T5-T8). SOS/VOD was defined according to the 2016 European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria. Pts' main characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Six out of 150 pts (4%) developed VOD during the follow up (4 “severe”, and 2 “very severe”). All pts were treated with Defibrotide, obtaining a complete remission in 5 of them, while 1 pt died due to VOD complications. Pts receiving TBI-based regimen were more likely to develop VOD compared to those receiving Treosulfan (10 to 14 g/m2) or Busulfan ev (9.6 to 12.8 mg/kg) (p 0.08). Similarly, higher baseline levels of bilirubin were associated with a higher incidence of VOD (p 0.08). Considering the CECs analysis, 615 samples were evaluated. At the enrollment, CECs levels were not related with any of clinical characteristics analyzed, except for the number of previous treatments. Indeed, those pts with 2 or more previous lines of treatments had higher levels of CECs (OR=0.53; p<0.001). Considering the different timepoints, conditioning regimen and alloSCT result in higher levels of CECs. Thus, CEC were higher at T1 than at T0 (p 0.02), as well as they were even higher at T2 than at T1 (p<0.0001) (Fig.1). Conversely, no significant differences have been observed between T3 and T2. No other clinical characteristic was correlated with CEC counts at the different timepoints. Pts who developed VOD had higher median levels of CEC at all the timepoints analyzed, but this difference has not achieved statistical significance, probably due to the low number of pts in the VOD group. At VOD onset, the pts always had an increase in CEC levels compared with the previous timepoint. After defibrotide treatment, the CEC levels increased in the first week, while they progressively decreased during the VOD treatment (T6 and T7, -50,7% and -71,5%, respectively). Recently, another endothelial activation marker has been considered: the Easix score. We didn't find any relationship between the Easix score at transplant and the VOD onset, even if a trend may be observed. We also investigated whether the CEC levels may be related with Easix score, but we didn't find any relationship at each timepoint. Interestingly, in a subgroup of pts CECs have been observed as a cluster of multiple cells. This data is firstly described in allo-SCT. Its functional significate remains unclear, but we found a relationship between CECs cluster and the number of CECs (p < 0.001). The incidence of VOD in our prospective study was low with respect to the one reported in the literature. This can be explained by the changes in alloSCT from the past (better selection of the pts, lower use of TBI, higher use of reduced intensity regimen) and the retrospective nature of most of the previous reports. We show that CECs can be considered reliable marker of endothelial damage in alloSCT pts, highlighting the impact of previous treatments, the conditioning regimen, and allo-SCT itself. Increased CEC level may be helpful to confirm VOD diagnosis, as well as their monitoring may be useful to evaluate the response to the treatment for VOD

Management of mixed cryoglobulinemia with rituximab: evidence and consensus-based recommendations from the Italian Study Group of Cryoglobulinemia (GISC)

Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) or mixed cryoglobulinemic syndrome (MCS) is a systemic small-vessel vasculitis characterized by the proliferation of B-cell clones producing pathogenic immune complexes, called cryoglobulins. It is often secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV), autoimmune diseases, and hematological malignancies. CV usually has a mild benign clinical course, but severe organ damage and life-threatening manifestations can occur. Recently, evidence in favor of rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody, is emerging in CV: nevertheless, questions upon the safety of this therapeutic approach, especially in HCV patients, are still being issued and universally accepted recommendations that can help physicians in MCS treatment are lacking. A Consensus Committee provided a prioritized list of research questions to perform a systematic literature review (SLR). A search was made in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library, updated to August 2021. Of 1227 article abstracts evaluated, 27 studies were included in the SLR, of which one SLR, 4 RCTs, and 22 observational studies. Seventeen recommendations for the management of mixed cryoglobulinemia with rituximab from the Italian Study Group of Cryoglobulinemia (GISC) were developed to give a valuable tool to the physician approaching RTX treatment in CV

Validation of the classification criteria for cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis

Objective. The aim of this study was to validate the classification criteria for cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis (CV). Methods. Twenty-three centres were involved. New patients with CV (group A) and controls, i.e. subjects with serum cryoglobulins but lacking CV based on the gold standard of clinical judgment (group B) and subjects without cryoglobulins but with clinical features that can be observed in the course of CV (group C), were studied. Positivity of serum cryoglobulins was necessary for CV classification. Sensitivity and specificity of the criteria were calculated by comparing group A vs group B. The group A vs group C comparison was done to demonstrate the possible diagnostic utility of the criteria. Results. The study included 268 patients in group A, 182 controls in group B and 193 controls in group C (small vessel vasculitis, 51.8%). The questionnaire (at least 2/3 positive answers) showed 89.0% sensitivity and 93.4% specificity; the clinical item (at least 3/4 clinical involvement) showed 75.7% sensitivity and 89.0% specificity and the laboratory item (at least 2/3 laboratory data) showed 80.2% sensitivity and 62.4% specificity. The sensitivity and specificity of the classification criteria (at least 2/3 positive items) were 89.9% and 93.5%, respectively. The comparison of group A with group C demonstrated the clinical utility of the criteria in differentiating CV from CV mimickers. Conclusion. Classification criteria for CV were validated in a second, large, international study confirming good sensitivity and specificity in a complex systemic disease