2,732 research outputs found

    Pragmatic reasoning schemas

    Full text link
    We propose that people typically reason about realistic situations using neither content-free syntactic inference rules nor representations of specific experiences. Rather, people reason using knowledge structures that we term pragmatic reasoning schemas, which are generalized sets of rules defined in relation to classes of goals. Three experiments examined the impact of a "permission schema" on deductive reasoning. Experiment 1 demonstrated that by evoking the permission schema it is possible to facilitate performance in Wason's selection paradigm for subjects who have had no experience with the specific content of the problems. Experiment 2 showed that a selection problem worded in terms of an abstract permission elicited better performance than one worded in terms of a concrete but arbitrary situation, providing evidence for an abstract permission schema that is free of domain-specific content. Experiment 3 provided evidence that evocation of a permission schema affects not only tasks requiring procedural knowledge, but also a linguistic rephrasing task requiring declarative knowledge. In particular, statements in the form if p then q were rephrased into the form p only if q with greater frequency for permission than for arbitrary statements, and rephrasings of permission statements produced a pattern of introduction of modals (must, can) totally unlike that observed for arbitrary conditional statements. Other pragmatic schemas, such as "causal" and "evidence" schemas can account for both linguistic and reasoning phenomena that alternative hypotheses fail to explain.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/25556/1/0000098.pd

    Covariation in natural causal induction.

    Full text link

    Covariation in natural causal induction.

    Get PDF

    Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning

    Full text link
    Two views have dominated theories of deductive reasoning. One is the view that people reason using syntactic, domain-independent rules of logic, and the other is the view that people use domain-specific knowledge. In contrast with both of these views, we present evidence that people often reason using a type of knowledge structure termed pragmatic reasoning schemas. In two experiments, syntactically equivalent forms of conditional rules produced different patterns of performance in Wason's selection task, depending on the type of pragmatic schema evoked. The differences could not be explained by either dominant view. We further tested the syntactic view by manipulating the type of logic training subjects received. If people typically do not use abstract rules analogous to those of standard logic, then training on abstract principles of standard logic alone would have little effect on selection performance, because the subjects would not know how to map such rules onto concrete instances. Training results obtained in both a laboratory and a classroom setting confirmed our hypothesis: Training was effective only when abstract principles were coupled with examples of selection problems, which served to elucidate the mapping between abstract principles and concrete instances. In contrast, a third experiment demonstrated that brief abstract training on a pragmatic reasoning schema had a substantial impact on subjects' reasoning about problems that were interpretable in terms of the schema. The dominance of pragmatic schemas over purely syntactic rules was discussed with respect to the relative utility of both types of rules for solving real-world problems.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26121/1/0000197.pd

    An MLL-Dependent Network Sustains Hematopoiesis

    Get PDF
    The histone methyltransferase Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) is essential to maintain hematopoietic stem cells and is a leukemia protooncogene. Although clustered homeobox genes are well-characterized targets of MLL and MLL fusion oncoproteins, the range of Mll-regulated genes in normal hematopoietic cells remains unknown. Here, we identify and characterize part of the Mll-dependent transcriptional network in hematopoietic stem cells with an integrated approach by using conditional loss-of-function models, genomewide expression analyses, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and functional rescue assays. The Mll-dependent transcriptional network extends well beyond the previously appreciated Hox targets, is comprised of many characterized regulators of self-renewal, and contains target genes that are both dependent and independent of the MLL cofactor, Menin. Interestingly, PR-domain containing 16 emerged as a target gene that is uniquely effective at partially rescuing Mll-deficient hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. This work highlights the tissue-specific nature of regulatory networks under the control of MLL/Trithorax family members and provides insight into the distinctions between the participation of MLL in normal hematopoiesis and in leukemia

    Bayesian generic priors for causal learning.

    Full text link

    Bˉ0→π+X\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ X in the Standard Model

    Full text link
    In this paper we investigate the possibility of studying B→πB\to \pi form factor using the semi-inclusive decays Bˉ0→π++Xq\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ + X_q. In general B→PXB\to PX semi-inclusive decays involve several hadronic parameters. But for Bˉ0→π+Xq\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ X_q decays we find that in the factorization approximation, the only unknown hadronic parameters are the form factors F0,1B→πF^{B\to \pi}_{0,1}. Therefore these form factors can be studied in Bˉ0→π+Xq\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ X_q decays. Using theoretical model calculations for the form factors the branching ratios for Bˉ0→π+Xd(ΔS=0)\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ X_d(\Delta S = 0) and Bˉ0→π+Xs(ΔS=−1)\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ X_s (\Delta S = -1), with the cut Eπ>2.1E_{\pi} > 2.1 GeV, are estimated to be in the ranges of (3.1∼4.9)×10−5(F1B→π(0)/0.33)2(3.1\sim 4.9) \times 10^{-5}(F^{B\to \pi}_1(0)/0.33)^2 and (2.5∼4.2)×10−5(F1B→π(0)/0.33)2(2.5\sim 4.2)\times 10^{-5}(F_1^{B\to \pi}(0)/0.33)^2, respectively, depending on the value of γ\gamma. The combined branching ratio for Bˉ0→π+(Xd+Xs)\bar B^0 \to \pi^+ (X_d+ X_s) is about 7.4×10−5(F1B→π(0)/0.33)27.4\times 10^{-5} (F^{B\to \pi}_1(0)/0.33)^2 and is insensitive to γ\gamma. We also discuss CP asymmetries in these decay modes.Comment: RevTex 8 pages and two figure
    • …
    corecore