20 research outputs found
Cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of cilostazol, milrinone, isoproterenol and ajmaline on electrographic and arrhythmic manifestations of early repolarization syndrome, and comparative analysis of the cardiac electrophysiological effects of the optical isomers of mexiletine
Different electrophysiological effects of the levo- and dextro-rotatory isomers of mexiletine in isolated rabbit cardiac muscle
Racemic mexiletine is a widely used antiarrhythmic agent which blocks sodium channels. The effects of R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine stereoisomers on maximum rate of depolarization (Vmax), conduction time and repolarization have not yet been investigated in isolated cardiac preparations. We studied the effect of the R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine on rabbit cardiac action potential parameters by using the conventional microelectrode technique. Both enantiomers at 20 microM of therapeutically and experimentally relevant concentration, significantly depressed the Vmax at fast heart rates (BCLs 300 - 700 ms). R-(-) mexiletine has more potent inhibitory effect than S-(+) mexiletine. Both R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine significantly inhibited the Vmax of early extrasystoles measured at 70 ms diastolic interval induced by S1-S2 stimuli. R-(-) mexiletine has more pronounced inhibitory effect than S-(+) mexiletine. Both R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine increased significantly the ERP/APD90 ratio. The time constant (tau) of recovery of Vmax was found to be tau = 376.0 +/- 77.8 ms for R-(-) mexiletine and tau = 227.1 +/- 23.4 ms for S-(+) mexiletine which indicates a slower offset kinetics for R-(-) mexiletine from sodium channels than that of the S-(+) enantiomer. These data suggest that R-(-) mexiletine might be more potent antiarrhythmic agent than S-(+) mexiletine
Cellular Mechanism Underlying Hypothermia-Induced Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation in the Setting of Early Repolarization and the Protective Effect of Quinidine, Cilostazol, and Milrinone
Mechanisms Underlying the Development of the Electrocardiographic and Arrhythmic Manifestations of Early Repolarization Syndrome
Mechanisms Underlying the Development of the Electrocardiographic and Arrhythmic Manifestations of Early Repolarization Syndrome
Different electrophysiological effects of the levo- and dextrorotatory isomers of mexiletine in isolated rabbit cardiac muscle
Racemic mexiletine is a widely used antiarrhythmic agent which blocks sodium channels. The effects of R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine stereoisomers on maximum rate of depolarization (Vmax), conduction time and repolarization have not yet been investigated in isolated cardiac preparations. We studied the effect of the R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine on rabbit cardiac action potential parameters by using the conventional microelectrode technique. Both enantiomers at 20 µM of therapeutically and experimentally relevant concentration, significantly depressed the Vmax at fast heart rates (BCLs 300 – 700 ms). R-(-) mexiletine has more potent inhibitory effect than S-(+) mexiletine. Both R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine significantly inhibited the Vmax of early extrasystoles measured at 70 ms diastolic interval induced by S1-S2 stimuli. R-(-) mexiletine has more pronounced inhibitory effect than S-(+) mexiletine. Both R-(-) and S-(+) mexiletine increased significantly the ERP/APD90 ratio. The time constant (τ) of recovery of Vmax was found to be τ = 376.0 ± 77.8 ms for R-(-) mexiletine and τ = 227.1 ± 23.4 ms for S-(+) mexiletine which indicates a slower offset kinetics for R-(-) mexiletine from sodium channels than that of the S-(+) enantiomer. These data suggest that R-(-) mexiletine might be more potent antiarrhythmic agent than S-(+) mexiletine.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author