18 research outputs found
The effect of collaborative networks on healthcare research performance
We can all use assessment and appraisal to help us improve our performance in any area of life. Healthcare researchers are no exception. For healthcare researchers a system is required to measure research performance according to an accepted global benchmark.
While there are existing systems that have been created to measure research performance in general, and healthcare research performance has been appraised with several bibliometric indicators, there is a lack of evidence to prove their validity and a deficiency of indicators that embrace social behaviours such as collaboration.
In this thesis we endeavoured to enhance knowledge on healthcare research performance assessment, which has the potential to be integrated into systems that specifically appraise healthcare research performance. Ultimately, these systems may promote a performance-based culture that better reflects the quality and impact of healthcare research.Open Acces
Leadership in cardiac surgery
Despite the efficacy of cardiac surgery, less invasive interventions with more uncertain long-term outcomes are increasingly challenging surgery as first-line treatment for several congenital, degenerative and ischemic cardiac diseases. The specialty must evolve if it is to ensure its future relevance. More importantly, it must evolve to ensure that future patients have access to treatments with proven long-term effectiveness. This cannot be achieved without dynamic leadership; however, our contention is that this is not enough. The demands of a modern surgical career and the importance of the task at hand are such that the serendipitous emergence of traditional charismatic leadership cannot be relied upon to deliver necessary change. We advocate systematic analysis and strategic leadership at a local, national and international level in four key areas: Clinical Care, Research, Education and Training, and Stakeholder Engagement. While we anticipate that exceptional individuals will continue to shape the future of our specialty, the creation of robust structures to deliver collective leadership in these key areas is of paramount importanc
A competency framework in cardiothoracic surgery for training and revalidation — an international comparison
The conventional methods of education, certification and recertification in cardiothoracic surgery face a paradigm shift in line with recent innovations in diagnostics and therapeutics. The attributes of a competent clinician entail proficiency in knowledge, communication, teamwork, management, health advocacy, professionalism and technical skills. This article investigates the skills required for a cardiothoracic surgeon to be competent. The relevant practice of certification and recertification across various regions has also been explored. Validated and competency-based curricula should be designed to develop core competencies to successfully integrate them into practice. Challenges to the implementation of such curricula and potential solutions are explored. Patient safety remains the ultimate aim to ensure excellence of both competency and performanc
Leadership behaviours and healthcare research performance: prospective correlational study
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine whether differences in leadership self-perception/behaviour in healthcare researchers may influence research performance and to evaluate whether certain leadership characteristics are associated with enhanced leadership efficiency in terms of motivation, effectiveness and satisfaction. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: All Faculty of Medicine Professors at Imperial College London (n=215) were sent the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) Self form as a means of evaluating self-perception of leadership behaviours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each professor, we extracted objective research performance measures (total number of publications, total number of citations and h index) from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009. The MLQ measured three leadership outcomes, which included motivation, effectiveness and satisfaction. Regression analysis was used to determine associations. RESULTS: A total number of 90 responses were received, which equated to a 42% response rate. There were no significant correlations between transformational, transactional or passive/avoidant leadership behaviours and any of the research performance measures. The five transformational leadership behaviours (ie, idealised attributes (IA), idealised behaviours (IB), inspirational motivation (IM), intellectual stimulation (IS), individual consideration (IC)) were highly significant predictors of leadership outcomes, extra effort (all B>0.404, SE=0.093-0.146, p0.359, SE=0.093-0.146, p0.483, SE=0.086-0.139, p<0.001; IB B=0.296, SE=0.101, p=0.004). Similarly, contingent reward was a significant predictor of extra effort (B=0.400, SE=0.123, p=0.002), effectiveness (B=0.353, SE=0.113, p=0.002) and satisfaction (B=0.326, SE=0.114, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that transformational leadership and contingent reward positively influence leadership efficiency in healthcare researchers. Although we did not show an association between leadership behaviours and research performance metrics, further studies using contextual performance measures at team and organisational levels are required
Measuring academic performance for healthcare researchers with the H index:which search tool should be used?
Objectives: To compare H index scores for healthcare researchers returned by Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus databases, and to assess whether a researcher’s age, country of institutional affiliation and physician status influences calculations. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and ninety-five Nobel laureates in Physiology and Medicine from 1901 to 2009 were considered. Year of first and last publications, total publications and citation counts, and the H index for each laureate were calculated from each database. Cronbach’s alpha statistics was used to measure the reliability of H index scores between the databases. Laureate characteristic influence on the H index was analysed using linear regression. Results: There was no concordance between the databases when considering the number of publications and citations count per laureate. The H index was the most reliably calculated bibliometric across the three databases (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.900). All databases returned significantly higher H index scores for younger laureates (p < 0.0001). Google Scholar and Web of Science returned significantly higher H index for physician laureates (p = 0.025 and p = 0.029, respectively). Country of institutional affiliation did not influence the H index in any database. Conclusion: The H index appeared to be the most consistently calculated bibliometric between the databases for Nobel laureates in Physiology and Medicine. Researcher-specific characteristics constituted an important component of objective research assessment. The findings of this study call to question the choice of current and future academic performance databases
Leadership behaviours and healthcare research performance: prospective correlational study
Objectives The aims of the study were to determine whether differences
in leadership self-perception/behaviour in healthcare researchers may
influence research performance and to evaluate whether certain
leadership characteristics are associated with enhanced leadership
efficiency in terms of motivation, effectiveness and satisfaction.
Design and participants All Faculty of Medicine Professors at Imperial
College London (n=215) were sent the Multifactor Leadership
Questionnaire (MLQ) Self form as a means of evaluating self-perception
of leadership behaviours.
Main outcome measures For each professor, we extracted objective
research performance measures (total number of publications, total
number of citations and h index) from 1 January 2007 to 31 December
2009. The MLQ measured three leadership outcomes, which included
motivation, effectiveness and satisfaction. Regression analysis was used
to determine associations.
Results A total number of 90 responses were received, which equated to a
42% response rate. There were no significant correlations between
transformational, transactional or passive/avoidant leadership
behaviours and any of the research performance measures. The five
transformational leadership behaviours (ie, idealised attributes (IA),
idealised behaviours (IB), inspirational motivation (IM), intellectual
stimulation (IS), individual consideration (IC)) were highly significant
predictors of leadership outcomes, extra effort (all B>0.404,
SE=0.093-0.146, p<0.001), effectiveness (IA, IM, IS, IC B>0.359,
SE=0.093-0.146, p<0.001; IB B=0.233, SE=0.103, p=0.026) and satisfaction
(IA, IM, IS, IC B>0.483, SE=0.086-0.139, p<0.001; IB B=0.296, SE=0.101,
p=0.004). Similarly, contingent reward was a significant predictor of
extra effort (B=0.400, SE=0.123, p=0.002), effectiveness (B=0.353,
SE=0.113, p=0.002) and satisfaction (B=0.326, SE=0.114, p=0.005).
Conclusions This study demonstrates that transformational leadership and
contingent reward positively influence leadership efficiency in
healthcare researchers. Although we did not show an association between
leadership behaviours and research performance metrics, further studies
using contextual performance measures at team and organisational levels
are required