Adenoid cystic carcinoma intermingled with ductal carcinoma of the breast: a case report and review of the literature

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Adenoid cystic cancer of the breast is a rare condition, and even rarer are the cases where it is histologically mixed with other variants of cancer within a single lesion. In this report, one of the few cases of mixed adenoid cystic breast cancer intermingled with the infiltrating ductal variant is presented. A subsequent review of the relevant literature presents the existing experience in treating mixed breast cancers with adenoid cystic components with regard to diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We describe a case of mixed adenoid cystic cancer of the breast with infiltrating ductal carcinoma in a 67-year-old Caucasian woman who underwent mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment of these patients, and radiotherapy is administered when breast-conserving treatment is undertaken or a large tumor with affected lymph nodes is present. Hormonal treatment does not have a role, as estrogen receptors are always absent from both tumor components. Chemotherapy is nearly always administered on the basis of estrogen receptor and progesterone negativity and the more aggressive potential of the non-adenoid cystic component. The de-differentiation of an indolent type of cancer to a more aggressive one may affect the prognosis.</p

MTOR/4EBP1 signaling and MMR status in colorectal cancer: New correlations and arising perspectives

This is the first study aiming to investigate mTOR signaling and its relation to mismatch repair status (MMR status) in colorectal cancer (CRC). MMR status and the phosphorylated proteins, pmTOR and p4EBP1, have been immunohistochemically analyzed in 108 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CRC specimens. The correlations between them and with clinicopathological data, MAPK pathway (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF) as well as their impact on patients’ overall survival have been statistically analyzed. Our results indicated that positive pmTOR expression was significantly associated with KRAS mutations (p = 0.004). From multivariate survival analysis, only p4EBP1 expression emerged as independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 3.322; 95%CI, 1.110-9.945; p = 0.032). Furthermore, MMR deficient carcinomas tend to express low p4EBP1 protein levels (p = 0.002). A survival analysis stratified by MMR status and p4EBP1 expression, showed that MMR proficient tumours with high p4EBP1 expression had the worst overall survival compared with the other examined subgroups (p = 0.019). In conclusion, MAPK and PI3k/Akt pathways seem to be simultaneously overactivated in CRC. P4EBP1 could be used as a prognostic biomarker. By further analyzing the significant association between MMR status and p4EBP1 expression, we suggest that MMR deficient tumours could represent a subpopulation most likely to derive treatment benefit from mTOR inhibition