MIR205HG/LEADR Long Noncoding RNA Binds to Primed Proximal Regulatory Regions in Prostate Basal Cells Through a Triplex- and Alu-Mediated Mechanism

Aside serving as host gene for miR-205, MIR205HG transcribes for a chromatin-associated long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) able to restrain the differentiation of prostate basal cells, thus being reannotated as LEADR (Long Epithelial Alu-interacting Differentiation-related RNA). We previously showed the presence of Alu sequences in the promoters of genes modulated upon MIR205HG/LEADR manipulation. Notably, an Alu element also spans the first and second exons of MIR205HG/LEADR, suggesting its possible involvement in target selection/binding. Here, we performed ChIRP-seq to map MIR205HG/LEADR chromatin occupancy at genome-wide level in prostate basal cells. Our results confirmed preferential binding to regions proximal to gene transcription start site (TSS). Moreover, enrichment of triplex-forming sequences was found upstream of MIR205HG/LEADR-bound genes, peaking at −1,500/−500 bp from TSS. Triplexes formed with one or two putative DNA binding sites within MIR205HG/LEADR sequence, located just upstream of the Alu element. Notably, triplex-forming regions of bound genes were themselves enriched in Alu elements. These data suggest, from one side, that triplex formation may be the prevalent mechanism by which MIR205HG/LEADR selects and physically interacts with target DNA, from the other that direct or protein-mediated Alu (RNA)/Alu (DNA) interaction may represent a further functional requirement. We also found that triplex-forming regions were enriched in specific histone modifications, including H3K4me1 in the absence of H3K27ac, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, indicating that in prostate basal cells MIR205HG/LEADR may preferentially bind to primed proximal regulatory elements. This may underscore the need for basal cells to keep MIR205HG/LEADR target genes repressed but, at the same time, responsive to differentiation cues

Mesenchymal to amoeboid transition is associated with stem-like features of melanoma cells

Background: Cellular plasticity confers cancer cells the ability to adapt to microenvironmental changes, a fundamental requirement for tumour progression and metastasis. The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a transcriptional programme associated with increased cell motility and stemness. Besides EMT, the mesenchymal to amoeboid transition (MAT) has been described during tumour progression but to date, little is known about its transcriptional control and involvement in stemness. The aim of this manuscript is to investigate (i) the transcriptional profile associated with the MAT programme and (ii) to study whether MAT acquisition in melanoma cancer cells correlates with clonogenic potential to promote tumour growth. Results: By using a multidisciplinary approach, we identified four different treatments able to induce MAT in melanoma cells: EphA2 overexpression, Rac1 functional inhibition using its RacN17 dominant negative mutant, stimulation with Ilomastat or treatment with the RhoA activator Calpeptin. First, gene expression profiling identified the transcriptional pathways associated with MAT, independently of the stimulus that induces the MAT programme. Notably, gene sets associated with the repression of mesenchymal traits, decrease in the secretion of extracellular matrix components as well as increase of cellular stemness positively correlate with MAT. Second, the link between MAT and stemness has been investigated in vitro by analysing stemness markers and clonogenic potential of melanoma cells undergoing MAT. Finally, the link between MAT inducing treatments and tumour initiating capability has been validated in vivo. Conclusion: Taken together, our results demonstrate that MAT programme in melanoma is characterised by increased stemness and clonogenic features of cancer cells, thus sustaining tumour progression. Furthermore, these data suggest that stemness is not an exclusive feature of cells undergoing EMT, but more generally is associated with an increase in cellular plasticity of cancer cells

Erratum to 'Core Biopsies from Prostate Cancer Patients in Active Surveillance Protocols Harbor PTEN and MYC Alterations'[European Urology Oncology 2 (2019) 277-285].

n/

miR-21: an oncomir on strike in prostate cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Aberrant expression of microRNAs, small non-coding RNA molecules that post-transcriptionally repress gene expression, seems to be causatively linked to the pathogenesis of cancer. In this context, miR-21 was found to be overexpressed in different human cancers (e.g. glioblastoma, breast cancer). In addition, it is thought to be endowed with oncogenic properties due to its ability to negatively modulate the expression of tumor-suppressor genes (e.g. <it>PTEN</it>) and to cause the reversion of malignant phenotype when knocked- down in several tumor models. On the basis of these findings, miR-21 has been proposed as a widely exploitable cancer-related target. However, scanty information is available concerning the relevance of miR-21 for prostate cancer. In the present study, we investigated the role of miR-21 and its potential as a therapeutic target in two prostate cancer cell lines, characterized by different miR-21 expression levels and <it>PTEN </it>gene status.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We provide evidence that miR-21 knockdown in prostate cancer cells is not sufficient <it>per se </it>i) to affect the proliferative and invasive potential or the chemo- and radiosensitivity profiles or ii) to modulate the expression of the tumor-suppressors PTEN and Pdcd4, which in other tumor types were found to be regulated by miR-21. We also show that miR-21 is not differently expressed in carcinomas and matched normal tissues obtained from 36 untreated prostate cancer patients subjected to radical prostatectomy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Overall, our data suggest that miR-21 is not a central player in the onset of prostate cancer and that its single hitting is not a valuable therapeutic strategy in the disease. This supports the notion that the oncogenic properties of miR-21 could be cell and tissue dependent and that the potential role of a given miRNA as a therapeutic target should be contextualized with respect to the disease.</p

SPOP Deregulation Improves the Radiation Response of Prostate Cancer Models by Impairing DNA Damage Repair

Speckle-type POZ (pox virus and zinc finger protein) protein (SPOP) is the most commonly mutated gene in prostate cancer (PCa). Recent evidence reports a role of SPOP in DNA damage response (DDR), indicating a possible impact of SPOP deregulation on PCa radiosensitivity. This study aimed to define the role of SPOP deregulation (by gene mutation or knockdown) as a radiosensitizing factor in PCa preclinical models. To express WT or mutant (Y87N, K129E and F133V) SPOP, DU145 and PC-3 cells were transfected with pMCV6 vectors. Sensitivity profiles were assessed using clonogenic assay and immunofluorescent staining of γH2AX and RAD51 foci. SCID xenografts were treated with 5 Gy single dose irradiation using an image-guided small animal irradiator. siRNA and miRNA mimics were used to silence SPOP or express the SPOP negative regulator miR-145, respectively. SPOP deregulation, by either gene mutation or knockdown, consistently enhanced the radiation response of PCa models by impairing DDR, as indicated by transcriptome analysis and functionally confirmed by decreased RAD51 foci. SPOP silencing also resulted in a significant downregulation of RAD51 and CHK1 expression, consistent with the impairment of homologous recombination. Our results indicate that SPOP deregulation plays a radiosensitizing role in PCa by impairing DDR via downregulation of RAD51 and CHK1. View Full-Tex

Navigating the Multiverse of Antisense RNAs: The Transcription- and RNA-Dependent Dimension

Evidence accumulated over the past decades shows that the number of identified antisense transcripts is continuously increasing, promoting them from transcriptional noise to real genes with specific functions. Indeed, recent studies have begun to unravel the complexity of the antisense RNA (asRNA) world, starting from the multidimensional mechanisms that they can exert in physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we discuss the multiverse of the molecular functions of asRNAs, describing their action through transcription-dependent and RNA-dependent mechanisms. Then, we report the workflow and methodologies to study and functionally characterize single asRNA candidates

Biological relevance and therapeutic potential of G-quadruplex structures in the human noncoding transcriptome

Noncoding RNAs are functional transcripts that are not translated into proteins. They represent the largest portion of the human transcriptome and have been shown to regulate gene expression networks in both physiological and pathological cell conditions. Research in this field has made remarkable progress in the comprehension of how aberrations in noncoding RNA drive relevant disease-associated phenotypes; however, the biological role and mechanism of action of several noncoding RNAs still need full understanding. Besides fulfilling its function through sequence-based mechanisms, RNA can form complex secondary and tertiary structures which allow non-canonical interactions with proteins and/or other nucleic acids. In this context, the presence of G-quadruplexes in microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs is increasingly being reported. This evidence suggests a role for RNA G-quadruplexes in controlling microRNA biogenesis and mediating noncoding RNA interaction with biological partners, thus ultimately regulating gene expression. Here, we review the state of the art of G-quadruplexes in the noncoding transcriptome, with their structural and functional characterization. In light of the existence and further possible development of G-quadruplex binders that modulate G-quadruplex conformation and protein interactions, we also discuss the therapeutic potential of G-quadruplexes as targets to interfere with disease-associated noncoding RNAs