deepschema.org: An Ontology for Typing Entities in the Web of Data

Discovering the appropriate type of an entity in the Web of Data is still considered an open challenge, given the complexity of the many tasks it entails. Among them, the most notable is the definition of a generic and cross-domain ontology. While the ontologies proposed in the past function mostly as schemata for knowledge bases of different sizes, an ontology for entity typing requires a rich, accurate and easily-traversable type hierarchy. Likewise, it is desirable that the hierarchy contains thousands of nodes and multiple levels, contrary to what a manually curated ontology can offer. Such level of detail is required to describe all the possible environments in which an entity exists in. Furthermore, the generation of the ontology must follow an automated fashion, combining the most widely used data sources and following the speed of the Web. In this paper we propose deepschema.org, the first ontology that combines two well-known ontological resources, Wikidata and schema.org, to obtain a highly-accurate, generic type ontology which is at the same time a first-class citizen in the Web of Data. We describe the automated procedure we used for extracting a class hierarchy from Wikidata and analyze the main characteristics of this hierarchy. We also provide a novel technique for integrating the extracted hierarchy with schema.org, which exploits external dictionary corpora and is based on word embeddings. Finally, we present a crowdsourcing evaluation which showcases the three main aspects of our ontology, namely the accuracy, the traversability and the genericity. The outcome of this paper is published under the portal: http://deepschema.github.io

Improving knowledge discovery from synthetic aperture radar images using the linked open data cloud and Sextant

In the last few years, thanks to projects like TELEIOS, the linked open data cloud has been rapidly populated with geospatial data some of it describing Earth Observation products (e.g., CORINE Land Cover, Urban Atlas). The abundance of this data can prove very useful to the new missions (e.g., Sentinels) as a means to increase the usability of the millions of images and EO products that are expected to be produced by these missions. In this paper, we explain the relevant opportunities by demonstrating how the process of knowledge discovery from TerraSAR-X images can be improved using linked open data and Sextant, a tool for browsing and exploration of linked geospatial data, as well as the creation of thematic maps

Managing big, linked, and open earth-observation data: Using the TELEIOS/LEO software stack

Big Earth-observation (EO) data that are made freely available by space agencies come from various archives. Therefore, users trying to develop an application need to search within these archives, discover the needed data, and integrate them into their application. In this article, we argue that if EO data are published using the linked data paradigm, then the data discovery, data integration, and development of applications becomes easier. We present the life cycle of big, linked, and open EO data and show how to support their various stages using the software stack developed by the European Union (EU) research projects TELEIOS and the Linked Open EO Data for Precision Farming (LEO). We also show how this stack of tools can be used to implement an operational wildfire-monitoring service

Real-Time Wildfire Monitoring Using Scientific Database and Linked Data Technologies

We present a real-time wildfire monitoring service that exploits satellite images and linked geospatial data to detect hotspots and monitor the evolution of fire fronts. The service makes heavy use of scientific database technologies (array databases, SciQL, data vaults) and linked data technologies (ontologies, linked geospatial data, stSPARQL) and is implemented on top of MonetDB and Strabon. The service is now operational at the National Observatory of Athens and has been used during the previous summer by emergency managers monitoring wildfires in Greece

SciLens: evaluating the quality of scientific news articles using social media and scientific literature indicators

This paper describes, develops, and validates SciLens, a method to evaluate the quality of scientific news articles. The starting point for our work are structured methodologies that define a series of quality aspects for manually evaluating news. Based on these aspects,we describe a series of indicators of news quality. According to our experiments, these indicators help non-experts evaluate more accurately the quality of a scientific news article, compared to nonexperts that do not have access to these indicators. Furthermore, SciLens can also be used to produce a completely automated quality score for an article, which agrees more with expert evaluators than manual evaluations done by non-experts. One of the main elements of SciLens is the focus on both content and context of articles, where context is provided by (1) explicit and implicit references on the article to scientific literature, and (2) reactions in social media referencing the article. We show that both contextual elements can be valuable sources of information for determining article quality. The validation of SciLens, done through a combination of expert and non-expert annotation, demonstrates its effectiveness for both semi-automatic and automatic quality evaluation of scientific news.This work is partially supported by the Open Science Fund of EPFL (http://www.epfl.ch/ research/initiatives/open-science-fund) and the La Caixa project (LCF/PR/PR16/11110009)

SciClops: Detecting and Contextualizing Scientific Claims for Assisting Manual Fact-Checking

This paper describes SciClops, a method to help combat online scientific misinformation. Although automated fact-checking methods have gained significant attention recently, they require pre-existing ground-truth evidence, which, in the scientific context, is sparse and scattered across a constantly-evolving scientific literature. Existing methods do not exploit this literature, which can effectively contextualize and combat science-related fallacies. Furthermore, these methods rarely require human intervention, which is essential for the convoluted and critical domain of scientific misinformation. SciClops involves three main steps to process scientific claims found in online news articles and social media postings: extraction, clustering, and contextualization. First, the extraction of scientific claims takes place using a domain-specific, fine-tuned transformer model. Second, similar claims extracted from heterogeneous sources are clustered together with related scientific literature using a method that exploits their content and the connections among them. Third, check-worthy claims, broadcasted by popular yet unreliable sources, are highlighted together with an enhanced fact-checking context that includes related verified claims, news articles, and scientific papers. Extensive experiments show that SciClops tackles sufficiently these three steps, and effectively assists non-expert fact-checkers in the verification of complex scientific claims, outperforming commercial fact-checking systems

SciLens: evaluating the quality of scientific news articles using social media and scientific literature indicators

This paper describes, develops, and validates SciLens, a method to evaluate the quality of scientific news articles. The starting point for our work are structured methodologies that define a series of quality aspects for manually evaluating news. Based on these aspects,we describe a series of indicators of news quality. According to our experiments, these indicators help non-experts evaluate more accurately the quality of a scientific news article, compared to nonexperts that do not have access to these indicators. Furthermore, SciLens can also be used to produce a completely automated quality score for an article, which agrees more with expert evaluators than manual evaluations done by non-experts. One of the main elements of SciLens is the focus on both content and context of articles, where context is provided by (1) explicit and implicit references on the article to scientific literature, and (2) reactions in social media referencing the article. We show that both contextual elements can be valuable sources of information for determining article quality. The validation of SciLens, done through a combination of expert and non-expert annotation, demonstrates its effectiveness for both semi-automatic and automatic quality evaluation of scientific news.This work is partially supported by the Open Science Fund of EPFL (http://www.epfl.ch/ research/initiatives/open-science-fund) and the La Caixa project (LCF/PR/PR16/11110009)

SciLander: Mapping the Scientific News Landscape

The COVID-19 pandemic has fueled the spread of misinformation on social media and the Web as a whole. The phenomenon dubbed `infodemic' has taken the challenges of information veracity and trust to new heights by massively introducing seemingly scientific and technical elements into misleading content. Despite the existing body of work on modeling and predicting misinformation, the coverage of very complex scientific topics with inherent uncertainty and an evolving set of findings, such as COVID-19, provides many new challenges that are not easily solved by existing tools. To address these issues, we introduce SciLander, a method for learning representations of news sources reporting on science-based topics. We extract four heterogeneous indicators for the sources; two generic indicators that capture (1) the copying of news stories between sources, and (2) the use of the same terms to mean different things (semantic shift), and two scientific indicators that capture (1) the usage of jargon and (2) the stance towards specific citations. We use these indicators as signals of source agreement, sampling pairs of positive (similar) and negative (dissimilar) samples, and combine them in a unified framework to train unsupervised news source embeddings with a triplet margin loss objective. We evaluate our method on a novel COVID-19 dataset containing nearly 1M news articles from 500 sources spanning a period of 18 months since the beginning of the pandemic in 2020. Our results show that the features learned by our model outperform state-of-the-art baseline methods on the task of news veracity classification. Furthermore, a clustering analysis suggests that the learned representations encode information about the reliability, political leaning, and partisanship bias of these sources