Management of Barrett’s Esophagus: Practice-Oriented Answers to Clinical Questions

Barrett’s esophagus is the most important complication of gastro-esophageal reflux disease and the only known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis and treatment of Barrett’s esophagus are clinically challenging as it requires a high level of knowledge and competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For instance, endoscopists should know when and how to perform biopsies when Barrett’s esophagus is suspected. Furthermore, the correct identification and treatment of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus is crucial to prevent progression to cancer as well as it is the endoscopic surveillance of treated patients. Herein, we report practice-oriented answers to clinical questions that clinicians should be aware of when approaching patients with Barrett’s esophagus

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either seven-day or 10-day triple therapies, and with a 10-day sequential regimen

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates achieved by standard seven-day triple therapies are decreasing in several countries, while a novel 10-day sequential regimen has achieved a very high success rate. A longer 10-day triple therapy, similar to the sequential regimen, was tested to see whether it could achieve a better infection cure rate

Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Strains Isolated in Bari, Southern Italy, in 2017-2018 by Phenotypic and Genotyping Methods

Objective: Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance is a constantly evolving process and local surveillance is warranted to guide clinicians in the choice of therapy.Materials and Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by E-test on 92 H. pylori strains, and resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin was also evaluated using a commercially available genotyping method.Results: In naive patients the resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole was 37.7%, 26.2%, and 16.4%, respectively, significantly lower than the percentage found in treated patients. Concomitant resistance to >= 2 antibiotics was also observed in naive patients. The A2143G mutation of the 23S-rRNA gene was the most frequently detected, also in naive patients. The highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)(50) value (256 mg/L) was associated with A2142 mutations in all the patients carrying them. For levofloxacin resistance a mutation in codon 87 was detected in 63.9% and in codon 91 in 36.1% of the H. pylori strains, without significant differences in the patients groups. A mutation in codon 87 was associated with the highest MIC50 value (32 mg/L).Conclusions: In our area, a high prevalence of H. pylori primary resistance was detected; these rates were higher in patients who had experienced failure of several courses of therapy. A better knowledge of the local epidemiology of resistance, and the genotypes responsible, will improve the H. pylori eradication rates

The \u201cthree-in-one\u201d formulation of bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication with or without probiotics supplementation: Efficacy and safety in daily clinical practice

Background: Clinical trials have shown a good efficacy of the “three-in-one” formulation of bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for Helicobacter (H.) pylori eradication. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the three-in-one BQT in clinical practice, and investigate the effect of probiotic supplementation, in Italy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective database, multicentre observational study was conducted in seven Italian Hospitals. Consecutive H. pylori-positive patients who received the three-in-one BQT for 10 days were included in the analysis. H. pylori eradication was assessed by histology, 13C-urea breath test, or stool antigen test. Compliance and adverse events were evaluated by interview. Results: A total of 376 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and 352 in the per protocol (PP) analyses. One hundred and ninety-three subjects received probiotics supplementation. Overall, eradication rates were 90.2% (95% Confidence Interval (CI):86.7-93.0) in ITT and 94.6% (95% CI: 91.7-96.7) in PP analyses. The compliance was good (≥90% of treatment taken) in 94.9% of patients. The proportion of patients with a good compliance was not different with and without probiotics supplementation (94.8% vs 95.1%). Eradication rates were equally high for first-line (91.4%), second-line (87.5%), and third-line treatments (91.7%) in the ITT analysis (P =.48). Adverse events were reported by 32.4% of patients, but only 6.1% of patients discontinued treatment. Conclusions: The three-in-one BQT is highly effective and well tolerated for H. pylori eradication in daily clinical practice. Probiotics supplementation fails to improve compliance

Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

Main Recommendation There is a need for well-organized comprehensive strategies to achieve good training in ESD. In this context, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) have developed a European core curriculum for ESD practice across Europe with the aim of high quality ESD training. Advanced endoscopy diagnostic practice is advised before initiating ESD training. Proficiency in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and adverse event management is recommended before starting ESD training ESGE discourages the starting of initial ESD training in humans. Practice on animal and/or ex vivo models is useful to gain the basic ESD skills. ESGE recommends performing at least 20 ESD procedures in these models before human practice, with the goal of at least eight en bloc complete resections in the last 10 training cases, with no perforation. ESGE recommends observation of experts performing ESD in tertiary referral centers. Performance of ESD in humans should start on carefully selected lesions, ideally small (<30mm), located in the antrum or in the rectum for the first 20 procedures. Beginning human practice in the colon is not recommended. ESGE recommends that at least the first 10 human ESD procedures should be done under the supervision of an ESD-proficient endoscopist. Endoscopists performing ESD should be able to correctly estimate the probability of performing a curative resection based on the characteristics of the lesion and should know the benefit/risk relationship of ESD when compared with other therapeutic alternatives. Endoscopists performing ESD should know how to interpret the histopathology findings of the ESD specimen, namely the criteria for low risk resection (curative), local risk resection, and high risk resection (non-curative), as well as their implications. ESD should be performed only in a setting where early and delayed complications can be managed adequately, namely with the possibility of admitting patients to a ward, and access to appropriate emergency surgical teams for the organ being treated with ESD