Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Who Do or Do Not Develop Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An Observational Study

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known complication of patients on invasive mechanical ventilation. The main cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is pneumonia. ARDS can occur in patients with community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonia. Data regarding ARDS incidence, related pathogens, and specific outcomes in patients with VAP is limited. This is a cohort study in which patients with VAP were evaluated in an 800-bed tertiary teaching hospital between 2004 and 2016. Clinical outcomes, microbiological and epidemiological data were assessed among those who developed ARDS and those who did not. Forty-one (13.6%) out of 301 VAP patients developed ARDS. Patients who developed ARDS were younger and presented with higher prevalence of chronic liver disease. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated pathogen, but without any difference between groups. Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was prescribed to ARDS patients as frequently as to those without ARDS. Ninety-day mortality did not significantly vary among patients with or without ARDS. Additionally, patients with ARDS did not have significantly higher intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality, ICU, and hospital length of stay, ventilation-free days, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In summary, ARDS deriving from VAP occurs in 13.6% of patients. Although significant differences in clinical outcomes were not observed between both groups, further studies with a higher number of patients are needed due to the possibility of the study being underpowered

SARS-CoV-2-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Pulmonary Mechanics and Gas-Exchange Abnormalities

In January 2020, the first cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were reported in Europe. Multiple outbreaks have since then led to a global pandemic, as well as to massive medical, economic, and social repercussions. SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia can develop into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) when mechanical ventilation (MV) is needed (3, 4). ARDS produces abnormalities in gas exchange with a variable degree of shunt (5), high dead space ventilation (dead space volume [Vd]/tidal volume [Vt] ratio) (6), diminished pulmonary compliance (7), and alterations to the pulmonary circulation (8). The cornerstone of ARDS management is to provide adequate gas exchange without further lung injury as a result of MV. To date, information regarding the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS is not completely known. However, this information is crucial to better apply MV and facilitate organ support strategies. We therefore present the characteristics of gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics, and ventilatory management of 50 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, who developed ARDS and underwent invasive MV (IMV). Methods: Descriptive analysis included 50 consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who developed ARDS (9) and underwent IMV. These patients were admitted to the SARS-CoV-2-dedicated intensive care units (ICUs) at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain, between March 7 and March 25, 2020. Upon ICU admission, epidemiological characteristics, the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, prognostic biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 infection (described in Reference 4), time from hospital to ICU admission, time from ICU admission to intubation, oxygen therapy or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use, and microbiology were investigated. On the day that criteria for ARDS diagnosis were met (9) and IMV was needed, the following assessments were performed: impairment in oxygenation was analyzed with the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, and abnormalities of CO2 metabolism were studied with the ventilatory ratio (VR), a surrogate parameter of Vd/Vt. In addition, adjunctive therapies and MV parameters related with ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI) described elsewhere (11-15) were investigated. Correlations of SARS-CoV-2 prognostic biomarkers (4), pulmonary mechanics, and gas-exchange data were performed. Twenty-eight-day and hospital mortality, ventilator- and ICU-free days at Day 28, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and need for tracheostomy were also evaluated (16). Finally, a subanalysis assessing differences before and after prone positioning was performed. For additional detail on the method, see the online supplement. Results: By March 25th, 2020, 50 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and ARDS had been admitted to our hospital. Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 66 (57-74) years. Thirty-six patients (72%) were men. Upon ARDS diagnosis, 44% of patients were initially classified as having moderate ARDS, whereas 24% were classified as having mild ARDS and 32% were classified as having severe ARDS. The outcomes of these patients are shown in Table 1. ICU and hospital lengths of stay were prolonged, and tracheostomy was performed in 30 (60%) patients. Hospital mortality was 34%

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to rule out early bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 critically ill patients

PurposeAlthough the prevalence of community-acquired respiratory bacterial coinfection upon hospital admission in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to be < 5%, almost three-quarters of patients received antibiotics. We aim to investigate whether procalcitonin (PCT) or C-reactive protein (CRP) upon admission could be helpful biomarkers to identify bacterial coinfection among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.MethodsWe carried out a multicentre, observational cohort study including consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to 55 Spanish intensive care units (ICUs). The primary outcome was to explore whether PCT or CRP serum levels upon hospital admission could predict bacterial coinfection among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of their association with mortality. We also conducted subgroups analyses in higher risk profile populations.ResultsBetween 5 February 2020 and 21 December 2021, 4076 patients were included, 133 (3%) of whom presented bacterial coinfection. PCT and CRP had low area under curve (AUC) scores at the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis [0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.61) and 0.6 (95% CI, 0.55-0.64), respectively], but high negative predictive values (NPV) [97.5% (95% CI 96.5-98.5) and 98.2% (95% CI 97.5-98.9) for PCT and CRP, respectively]. CRP alone was associated with bacterial coinfection (OR 2, 95% CI 1.25-3.19; p = 0.004). The overall 15, 30 and 90 days mortality had a higher trend in the bacterial coinfection group, but without significant difference. PCT & GE; 0.12 ng/mL was associated with higher 90 days mortality.ConclusionOur study suggests that measurements of PCT and CRP, alone and at a single time point, are not useful for ruling in or out bacterial coinfection in viral pneumonia by COVID-19

Prevalencia de depresión y factores asociados en el adulto mayor en la parroquia de Cañaribamba, cuenca 2013

INTRODUCCIÓN: la depresión es un trastorno que afecta la salud del adulto mayor al igual que enfermedades como: la hipertensión arterial, diabetes, artropatías, neoplasias, las mismas que pueden coexistir y exacerbar sus síntomas. OBJETIVO GENERAL: determinar la prevalencia de depresión del adulto mayor y factores asociados en la parroquia Cañaribamba de la Ciudad de Cuenca. METODOLOGÍA: se realizó un estudio transversal, en 300 adultos mayores de la parroquia Cañaribamba, los datos se obtuvieron mediante encuestas con aplicación de la escala validada de Depresión Yesavage. La información fue procesada mediante el software SPSS y Microsoft Excel 2010, se utilizó frecuencias, porcentajes, promedio y DS y para asociación RP (C 95%.) RESULTADOS: la prevalencia de depresión fue del 14,7% con una media de edad de 73,7 años; con el 66.7% de mujeres, casados en el 40%; Los factores asociados a depresión fueron adultos mayores , los que no poseen ocupación 1,9 veces más de los si poseen. (IC 95% 1,1-3,4), La probabilidad de depresión al vivir solo fue 1,9 veces (IC 95% 1,08-3,3), más de los que viven acompañados, diabetes 1,8 veces más que los que no poseían (IC 95% 1,06-3,1), Evento Cerebro Vascular (ECV) y neoplasias 2,4 más veces que las que no tenían (IC 95% 1,2-5). CONCLUSIONES: la prevalencia de depresión en la población geriátrica de Cañaribamba fue menor a la reportada a nivel internacional y está asociada a factores como: diabetes, ECV y neoplasias. PALABRAS CLAVES: DEPRESIÓN, ADULTO MAYOR, FACTORES ASOCIADOS A ENFERMEDADES, MIEDO, SOLEDAD, FRUSTRACIONES.INTRODUCTION: Depression is a disorder that affects the health of the elderly as well as diseases such as: hypertension, diabetes, arthropathy, tumors, they can coexist and exacerbate their symptoms. GENERAL OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of depression in the elderly and associated factors in Cañaribamba parish of the city of Cuenca. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 300 adults over the Cañaribamba parish, data were collected through surveys with application of validated Yesavage scale for Depression. The information was processed using SPSS and Microsoft Excel 2010 software; frequencies, percentages, mean and SD were used, and for association RP (C 95%.) RESULTS: The prevalence of depression was 14.7% with a mean age of 73.7 years; with 66.7% of women, 40% married; Factors associated with depression were elderly, those without occupation of 1.9 times more than the ones that possess. (95% CI 1.1-3.4), the likelihood of depression by living alone was 1.9 times (95% CI 1.08 to 3.3), more than the living accompanied, diabetes 1.8 times more than those who had not (95% CI 1.06 to 3.1), Cerebrovascular Event (CVD) and cancers 2.4 more times than those without (95% CI 1.2 to 5). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of depression in the geriatric population of Cañaribamba was lower than reported internationally and is associated with factors such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancers. KEYWORDS: DEPRESSION, OLDER, FACTORS ASSOCIATED DISEASES, FEAR, LONELINESS, FRUSTRATION.MédicaCuenc

Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Who Do or Do Not Develop Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An Observational Study

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known complication of patients on invasive mechanical ventilation. The main cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is pneumonia. ARDS can occur in patients with community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonia. Data regarding ARDS incidence, related pathogens, and specific outcomes in patients with VAP is limited. This is a cohort study in which patients with VAP were evaluated in an 800-bed tertiary teaching hospital between 2004 and 2016. Clinical outcomes, microbiological and epidemiological data were assessed among those who developed ARDS and those who did not. Forty-one (13.6%) out of 301 VAP patients developed ARDS. Patients who developed ARDS were younger and presented with higher prevalence of chronic liver disease. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated pathogen, but without any difference between groups. Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was prescribed to ARDS patients as frequently as to those without ARDS. Ninety-day mortality did not significantly vary among patients with or without ARDS. Additionally, patients with ARDS did not have significantly higher intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality, ICU, and hospital length of stay, ventilation-free days, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In summary, ARDS deriving from VAP occurs in 13.6% of patients. Although significant differences in clinical outcomes were not observed between both groups, further studies with a higher number of patients are needed due to the possibility of the study being underpowere

Effects of intubation timing in patients with COVID-19 throughout the four waves of the pandemic: a matched analysis

Background: The primary aim of our study was to investigate the association between intubation timing and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated respiratory failure. We also analysed both the impact of such timing throughout the first four pandemic waves and the influence of prior noninvasive respiratory support on outcomes. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, observational and prospective cohort study that included all consecutive patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19 from across 58 Spanish intensive care units (ICUs) participating in the CIBERESUCICOVID project. The study period was between 29 February 2020 and 31 August 2021. Early intubation was defined as that occurring within the first 24 h of ICU admission. Propensity score matching was used to achieve a balance across baseline variables between the early intubation cohort and those patients who were intubated after the first 24 h of ICU admission. Differences in outcomes between early and delayed intubation were also assessed. We performed sensitivity analyses to consider a different time-point (48 h from ICU admission) for early and delayed intubation. Results: Of the 2725 patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation, a total of 614 matched patients were included in the analysis (307 for each group). In the unmatched population, there were no differences in mortality between the early and delayed groups. After propensity score matching, patients with delayed intubation presented higher hospital mortality (27.3% versus 37.1%; p=0.01), ICU mortality (25.7% versus 36.1%; p=0.007) and 90-day mortality (30.9% versus 40.2%; p=0.02) compared with the early intubation group. Very similar findings were observed when we used a 48-h time-point for early or delayed intubation. The use of early intubation decreased after the first wave of the pandemic (72%, 49%, 46% and 45% in the first, second, third and fourth waves, respectively; first versus second, third and fourth waves p<0.001). In both the main and sensitivity analyses, hospital mortality was lower in patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (n=294) who were intubated earlier. The subgroup of patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation (n=214) before intubation showed higher mortality when delayed intubation was set as that occurring after 48 h from ICU admission, but not when after 24 h. Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, delayed intubation was associated with a higher risk of hospital mortality. The use of early intubation significantly decreased throughout the course of the pandemic. Benefits of such an approach occurred more notably in patients who had received HFNC