Determining the effectiveness of harm reduction interventions in the prevention of hepatitis C virus transmission among people who inject drugs in Scotland

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly prevalent among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Scotland and the large majority of new HCV infections occurring in Scotland are within this population group. Harm reduction interventions, mainly sterile injecting equipment provision (IEP) and opioid substitution treatment (OST), to prevent the transmission of blood-borne viruses among PWID, were implemented in Scotland in the late 1980s/early 1990s. More recently, government policy initiatives, particularly the Hepatitis C Action Plan for Scotland, have stipulated the scale-up of these interventions. The overarching aim of this thesis was to investigate the impact of harm reduction interventions on the transmission of HCV among PWID in Scotland. Five secondary objectives were addressed in order to fulfil the main aim: (i) to review the international literature on the effectiveness of IEP and OST in preventing HCV transmission; (ii) to determine the association between self-reported sharing of needles/syringes and incident/prevalent HCV infection; (iii) to determine the association between sharing non-needle/syringe injecting paraphernalia and incident HCV infection; (iv) to determine the incidence of HCV among PWID in Scotland; and (v) to determine the association between self-reported uptake of IEP/OST and incident HCV infection. To address the first thesis objective, a systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify existing international research evidence (published up to March 2007) for the effectiveness of harm reduction interventions. While HCV was the main outcome of interest, HIV and injecting risk behaviour (IRB) were also considered. A review of reviews approach identified: insufficient evidence that sterile needle and syringe provision (NSP) was effective in preventing HCV transmission; tentative evidence that NSP was effective in preventing HIV transmission; sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of NSP in reducing self-reported IRB; and little to no evidence on needle/syringe vending machines, outreach NSP or the provision of other injecting paraphernalia (spoons, filters, water) in relation to any of the outcomes. With regard to OST, the findings were: insufficient evidence to show that OST has an impact on HCV transmission; sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of continuous OST in reducing HIV transmission; and sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of OST in reducing IRB by reducing the frequency of injection, the sharing of injecting equipment and injecting risk scores. An update to the review of reviews was undertaken to include literature published through March 2011, and found that little changed as a result of additional published reviews: in the main, the evidence statement for the effectiveness of OST with regard to HCV was upgraded from insufficient to tentative. The finding of weaker evidence with regard to biological outcomes (e.g. HCV, HIV), as compared with behavioural outcomes, indicated that low levels of IRB may be insufficient to reduce high levels of transmission, particularly for HCV. The subsequent chapter aimed to address the second thesis objective, by summarising, and exploring factors that explained the variation in, the measure of association between self-reported sharing of needles/syringes and HCV prevalence/incidence among PWID. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to identify and combine the results of European studies of HCV prevalence (or incidence) among those who reported ever/never (or recent/non-recent) sharing of needles/syringes. Among the 16 cross-sectional studies and four longitudinal studies identified, the pooled prevalence of HCV was 59% among PWID who reported never sharing needles/syringes and the pooled incidence of HCV was 11% among PWID who reported not recently sharing needles/syringes. Random effects meta-analysis generated a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-4.6), comparing HCV infection among those who ever (or recently) shared needles/syringes relative to those who reported never (or not recently) sharing. Differences in pooled ORs were found when studies were stratified by recruitment setting (prison vs. drug treatment sites), recruitment method (outreach vs. non-outreach), sample HCV prevalence and sample mean/median time since onset of injecting. High incidence/prevalence rates among those who did not report sharing needles/syringes during the risk period may be a result of a combination of unmeasured risk factors (such as sharing non-needle/syringe injecting paraphernalia) and reporting bias. Study design and population were found to be modifiers of the size and strength of association between HCV and needle/syringe-sharing. To address the third thesis objective, the risk of HCV associated with sharing injecting paraphernalia (spoons, filters and water) was investigated using data from the 2008-09 and 2010 sweeps in a series of national cross-sectional surveys of PWID in Scotland, collectively called the Needle Exchange Surveillance Initiative (NESI). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between recent HCV infection (anti-HCV negative and HCV-RNA positive individuals) and self-reported measures of injecting equipment sharing in the six months preceding interview. Twelve percent of the sample reported sharing needles/syringes and 40% reported sharing paraphernalia in the previous six months. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for sharing needles/syringes (with or without paraphernalia) and sharing only paraphernalia in the last six months were 6.7 (95% CI 2.6-17.1) and 3.0 (95% CI 1.2-7.5), respectively. Among those who reported not sharing needles/syringes, sharing spoons and sharing filters were significantly associated with recent HCV infection (AOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.8 and 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.5, respectively); sharing water was not. This cross-sectional approach to the analysis of the association between sharing paraphernalia and incident HCV infection demonstrated consistent results with previous longitudinal studies. The prevalence of paraphernalia-sharing in the study population was high, potentially representing a significant source of HCV transmission. Addressing the fourth and fifth thesis objectives, a method to determine the incidence of HCV among PWID using a cross-sectional design was applied, and the associations between self-reported uptake of harm reduction interventions (OST and IEP) and recent HCV infection were examined. This was undertaken on data from the first sweep (2008-09) of NESI. Twenty-four recent HCV infections (as defined above) were detected, yielding incidence rate estimates ranging from 10.8-21.9 per 100 person-years. After adjustment for confounders, those with high needle/syringe coverage had reduced odds of recent infection (AOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10-1.00, p=0.050). In the Greater Glasgow and Clyde region only, there were reduced odds of recent infection among those currently receiving OST, relative to those on OST in the last six months but not currently (AOR 0.04, 95% CI 0.001-1.07, p=0.055). The effect of combined uptake of OST and high needle/syringe coverage was only significant in unadjusted analyses (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.97, p=0.043; AOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.16-1.48, p=0.203). The final analysis chapter built on the previous chapter investigating the association between uptake of harm reduction interventions and recent HCV infection, by using data from three sweeps of the NESI survey, undertaken in 2008-09, 2010 and 2011-12. A framework to triangulate different types of evidence – ‘group-level/ecological’ and ‘individual-level’ – was applied. Data on service provision (injecting equipment provision and methadone dispensation) were also collated and analysed. Ecological analyses examined changes in intervention provision, self-reported intervention uptake, self-reported risk behaviour and HCV incidence; individual-level analyses investigated relationships within the pooled survey data. The approach to deriving estimates for incidence, and associated uncertainty ranges, was modified from that applied to the first sweep of NESI. A decline in HCV incidence, per 100 person-years, from 13.6 (95% CI 8.1-20.1) in 2008-09 to 7.3 (95% CI 3.0-12.9) in 2011-12 was observed, a period during which increases in the coverage of OST and IEP, and decreases in the frequency of injecting and sharing of injecting equipment, were also seen. Individual-level evidence demonstrated that combined OST and high coverage of needles/syringes were associated with reduced risk of recent HCV in analyses that were unweighted (AOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.74) and weighted for frequency of injecting (AORw 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.18). There was no additional effect found for high paraphernalia coverage. The combination of harm reduction interventions may have averted an estimated 1,400 new HCV infections and 1,000 new chronic infections between 2008 and 2012. The body of work in this thesis represents a novel contribution to the evidence base: it was the first large-scale, national application of a method designed to determine incidence of HCV using a cross-sectional design, and the first study to apply a framework to triangulate the evidence from different designs in order to investigate the association between harm reduction interventions and HCV transmission. This thesis does not propose to be able to establish a definitive causal link between IEP/OST and the prevention of HCV transmission. It does, however, provide sufficiently plausible evidence that the scale-up of a combination of harm reduction interventions in Scotland between 2008 and 2012 contributed to the reduction in HCV incidence observed. Components of the thesis have already influenced existing policy and practice in Scotland and internationally. Regarding future policy in this area, the evidence generated and presented here supports, at least, the maintenance of the HCV prevention investment in Scotland, and certainly the consideration of further scale-up

Exploring associations between perceived HCV status and injecting risk behaviors among recent initiates to injecting drug use in Glasgow

The aim of this study was to explore the influence of testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and perceived HCV status on injecting risk behavior. A cross-sectional, community-wide survey was undertaken at multiple sites throughout Greater Glasgow during 2001-2002. Four hundred ninety-seven injecting drug users (IDUs) consented to participate and were interviewed using a structured questionnaire to ascertain HCV test history and injecting risk behavior. The average age of participants was 27 years and the majority of the sample were male (70.4%). Participants had been injecting for an average duration of 2.5 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant associations between having been tested and injecting risk behavior. After adjustment for potential confounding variables, HCV-negatives were significantly less likely to borrow needles/syringes and spoons or filters as compared with unawares and were significantly less likely to borrow spoons or filters as compared with HCV-positives. Due to the cross-sectional design of the study, it is uncertain whether this reduction in risk behavior could be attributed to perception of HCV status. Further research is recommended to consolidate the evidence for this relationship

Harm reduction among injecting drug users - evidence of effectiveness

This chapter synthesises and evaluates the available direct evidence relating to the impact of needle and syringe programmes (NSPs), opioid substitution treatment (OST), drug consumption rooms (DCRs), and peer naloxone distribution (PND) on HIV/hepatitis C (HCV) incidence/prevalence, injecting risk behaviour and overdose-related mortality. To achieve this, we conducted a review of reviews; a systematic and explicit method used to identify, select and critically appraise relevant findings from secondary level research (systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses) into an evidence briefing. In the absence of high-quality reviews, appraisal of the evidence was supplemented with a targeted review of the primary literature. We find that there is sufficient review-level evidence that OST reduces HIV transmission, while the evidence in support of NSPs reducing HIV transmission is more tentative, and for DCRs currently insufficient. There is tentative evidence that OST has limited effectiveness in reducing HCV transmission, and insufficient evidence to support or discount NSPs or DCRs' ability to reduce HCV transmission. There is sufficient review-level evidence that NSPs, OST and DCRs reduce self-reported injecting risk behaviour. There is sufficient review evidence that OST reduces risk of overdose mortality, but insufficient evidence to support or discount the effect of DCRs or PND on overdose deaths at the community level. Our review shows evidence in support of a variety of harm reduction interventions but highlights an uneven presence of high-quality review evidence. Future evaluation of harm reduction programmes should prioritise methodologically robust study designs

HCV epidemiology in high-risk groups and the risk of reinfection

Injecting risk behaviours among people who inject drugs (PWID) and high-risk sexual practices among men who have sex with men (MSM) are important routes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission. Current direct-acting antiviral treatment offers unique opportunities for reductions in HCV-related liver disease burden and epidemic control in high-risk groups, but these prospects could be counteracted by HCV reinfection due to on-going risk behaviours after successful treatment. Based on existing data from small and heterogeneous studies of interferon-based treatment, the incidence of reinfection after sustained virological response range from 2-6/100 person years among PWID to 10-15/100 person years among human immunodeficiency virus-infected MSM. These differences mainly reflect heterogeneity in study populations with regards to risk behaviours, but also reflect variations in study designs and applied virological methods. Increasing levels of reinfection are to be expected as we enter the interferon-free treatment era. Individual- and population-level efforts to address and prevent reinfection should therefore be undertaken when providing HCV care for people with on-going risk behaviour. Constructive strategies include acknowledgement, education and counselling, harm reduction optimization, scaled-up treatment including treatment of injecting networks, post-treatment screening, and rapid retreatment of reinfections

Decrease in health-related quality of life associated with awareness of hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs in Scotland

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can significantly reduce health-related quality of life (QoL), but it is not clear if reduction is associated with the infection or with being aware of one's infection status. Understanding the impact of a HCV diagnosis on QoL is essential to inform decision-making regarding screening/testing and treatment. Using a cross-sectional design, we assessed QoL in 2898 people who inject drugs (PWID), surveyed in Scotland during 2010 using EQ-5D. Multifactorial regression compared self-reported QoL between PWID who were (i) chronically HCV-infected and aware of their infected status, (ii) chronically HCV-infected but unaware, and (iii) not chronically infected. Median time since onset of injecting was 10years; not chronically infected PWID were younger and had shorter injecting careers than chronically infected PWID. Median EQ-5D was highest for the not chronically infected and the chronic/unaware groups (0.73) compared with the chronic/aware group (0.66). After adjustment for demographic and behavioural co-factors, QoL was significantly reduced in chronic/aware compared with chronic/unaware PWID (adjusted B=-0.09, p=0.005); there was no evidence for a difference in QoL between not chronically infected and chronic/unaware PWID (adjusted B=-0.03, p=0.13). Awareness of one's chronic HCV status was associated with reduced health-related QoL, but there was no evidence for further reduction attributable to chronic infection itself after adjusting for important covariate differences

Implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software in a major construction contracting organization in Hong Kong

Purpose &ndash; The purpose of this paper is to summarize the scope, methodology and main findings of a doctoral thesis about the implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software in a major construction contracting organization in Hong Kong. This research is taken from a leadership and power and project management (PM) perspective.Design/methodology/approach &ndash; The project adopted a case study approach in which the candidate was an employee/observer, who was embedded as a member of the business transformation team taking an action learning approach to study the ERP adoption. The research used the soft system methodology to identify gaps in the observed maturity level which exists in the organization. Data was gathered using public and private documentation, semi-structured interviews, observation and was validated through review of evidence with participants.Findings &ndash; The results identified the importance of leadership and cultural issues in implementation of the business strategy. This research includes a contribution in two spheres: PM and construction procurement. The first implication for PM theory was to illustrate how knowledge has been efficiently managed within a construction organization by using information communication technology (ICT). It can be represented by the ladder of ICT&gt;ERP&gt;KM&gt;PM. The second implication was to pave the way for the use of partnering strategies in PM practice. It can be represented by the ladder of National Culture&gt;Organizational Culture&gt;Leadership&gt;Partnering Strategy&gt;PM.Practical implications &ndash; This model could be adapted to other large and complex organisational contexts. The research project also has implications as opening up a PM perspective on business transformation.Originality/value &ndash; The contribution of this research is proving the success of adopting KM in a construction company by using an ERP system. The importance of culture in the traditionally collectivistic construction industry, and the issues senior management should take into account when formulating business strategies.<br /

Increased risk of HIV and other drug-related harms associated with injecting in public places: national bio-behavioural survey of people who inject drugs

Background: Whilst injecting drugs in public places is considered a proxy for high risk behaviour among people who inject drugs (PWID), studies quantifying its relationship with multiple drug-related harms are lacking and none have examined this in the context of an ongoing HIV outbreak (located in Glasgow, Scotland). We aimed to: 1) estimate the prevalence of public injecting in Scotland and associated risk factors; and 2) estimate the association between public injecting and HIV, current HCV, overdose, and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Methods: Cross-sectional, bio-behavioural survey (including dried blood spot testing to determine HIV and HCV infection) of 1469 current PWID (injected in last 6 months) recruited by independent interviewers from 139 harm reduction services across Scotland during 2017–18. Primary outcomes were: injecting in a public place (yes/no); HIV infection; current HCV infection; self-reported overdose in the last year (yes/no) and SSTI the last year (yes/no). Multi-variable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with public injecting and to estimate the association between public injecting and drug-related harms (HIV, current HCV, overdose and SSTI). Results: Prevalence of public injecting was 16% overall in Scotland and 47% in Glasgow city centre. Factors associated with increased odds of public injecting were: recruitment in Glasgow city centre (aOR=5.45, 95% CI 3.48–8.54, p&lt;0.001), homelessness (aOR=3.68, 95% CI 2.61–5.19, p&lt;0.001), high alcohol consumption (aOR=2.42, 95% CI 1.69–3.44, p&lt;0.001), high injection frequency (≥4 per day) (aOR=3.16, 95% CI 1.93–5.18, p&lt;0.001) and cocaine injecting (aOR=1.46, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.13, p = 0.046). Odds were lower for those receiving opiate substitution therapy (OST) (aOR=0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.56, p&lt;0.001) and older age (per year increase) (aOR=0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.99, p = 0.013). Public injecting was associated with an increased risk of HIV infection (aOR=2.11, 95% CI 1.13–3.92, p = 0.019), current HCV infection (aOR=1.49, 95% CI 1.01–2.19, p = 0.043), overdose (aOR=1.59, 95% CI 1.27–2.01, p&lt;0.001) and SSTI (aOR=1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.73, p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need to address the additional harms observed among people who inject in public places and provide evidence to inform proposals in the UK and elsewhere to introduce facilities that offer safer drug consumption environments

Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 testing, diagnosis and COVID-19 disease among individuals prescribed opioid-agonist treatment: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Objectives: Among people receiving opioid-agonist treatment (OAT), the risk of COVID-19 infection and disease may be higher owing to underlying health problems and vulnerable social circumstances. We aimed to determine whether recent OAT, when compared with past exposure, affected the risk of (i) testing for SARS-CoV-2, (ii) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, and (iii) being hospitalized or dying with COVID-19 disease. Methods: We included individuals prescribed OAT in Scotland from 2015 to 2020. We performed record linkage to SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, vaccination, hospitalization, and mortality data, and followed up from March 2020 to December 2021. We used proportional hazards analysis and multivariate logistic regression to estimate associations between recent OAT prescription (in the previous 2 months), compared with past exposure (off treatment for over a year), and COVID-19 outcomes. Models were adjusted for confounders. Results: Among 36 093 individuals prescribed OAT, 19 071 (52.9%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 2896 (8.3%) tested positive; and 552 (1.5%) were hospitalized or died with COVID-19. Recent OAT, compared with past exposure, was associated with lower odds of testing positive among those tested (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57–0.69). However, among those testing positive, recent OAT was associated with two-fold higher odds of hospitalization or death (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60–2.59). Discussion: We found that recent OAT was associated with lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but with higher odds of disease once diagnosed. Clinical studies are needed to unravel the role of OAT in these associations. An enhanced effort is warranted to increase vaccine coverage among OAT patients to mitigate the severe consequences of COVID-19.</p