14 research outputs found

    Evaluation of Acellular Dermis for Closure of Abdominal Wall Defects in a Rat Model

    Get PDF
    Background: Abdominal wall repair can be performed with synthetic or biological materials. Biological materials may reduce the risk of infections and fibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate two acellular human dermis products. Materials and Methods: A rat model was used to compare the two materials. One was prepared using low concentrations of NaOH; the other material was SureDerm (TM), which is commercially available. Full thickness defects were prepared in the abdominal wall and closed with the materials. Rats were sacrificed at 1 or 4 months after operation and the numbers of adhesions to the bowels were scored. Samples were taken for histological analysis and to measure the breaking strength. Results: In both groups a good functional integration of the implants with the abdominal wall was observed. There was no adhesion formation with the bowels in the group with the NaOH prototype. In the SureDerm group, 4 out of 7 rats showed only small adhesions at 4 months after operation. Breaking strength of the healed tissue was significantly higher in the NaOH prototype group at 4 months after operation (p < 0.0026). Conclusions: The results indicate that both human acellular dermis products may be used in clinical trials for closure of abdominal wall defects

    Citrate confers less filter-induced complement activation and neutrophil degranulation than heparin when used for anticoagulation during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients

    No full text
    Background: During continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH), regional anticoagulation with citrate may be superior to heparin in terms of biocompatibility, since heparin as opposed to citrate may activate complement (reflected by circulating C5a) and induce neutrophil degranulation in the filter and myeloperoxidase (MPO) release from endothelium. Methods: No anticoagulation (n = 13), unfractionated heparin (n = 8) and trisodium citrate (n = 17) regimens during CVVH were compared. Blood samples were collected pre- and postfilter; C5a, elastase and MPO were determined by ELISA. Additionally, C5a was also measured in the ultrafiltrate. Results: In the heparin group, there was C5a production across the filter which most decreased over time as compared to other groups (P = 0.007). There was also net production of elastase and MPO across the filter during heparin anticoagulation (P = 0.049 or lower), while production was minimal and absent in the no anticoagulation and citrate group, respectively. During heparin anticoagulation, plasma concentrations of MPO at the inlet increased in the first 10 minutes of CVVH (P = 0.024). Conclusion: Citrate confers less filter-induced, potentially harmful complement activation and neutrophil degranulation and less endothelial activation than heparin when used for anticoagulation during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients

    A Bedside Clinical Prediction Rule for Detecting Moderate or Severe Aortic Stenosis

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with independent comparison to a diagnostic reference standard, doppler echocardiography. SETTING: Urban university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive hospital inpatients (n = 124) who had been referred for echocardiography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants were examined by a third-year general internal medicine resident and a staff general internist. We hypothesized in advance that absence of a murmur over the right clavicle would rule out aortic stenosis, while the presence of three or four associated findings (slow carotid artery upstroke, reduced carotid artery volume, maximal murmur intensity at the second right intercostal space, and reduced intensity of the second heart sound) would rule in aortic stenosis. Study physicians were unaware of echocardiographic findings. The outcome was echocardiographic moderate or severe aortic stenosis, defined as a valve area of 1.2 cm(2)or less, or a peak instantaneous gradient of 25 mm Hg or greater. Absence of a murmur over the right clavicle ruled out aortic stenosis (likelihood ratio [LR] 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01, 0.44). The presence of three or four associated findings ruled in aortic stenosis (LR 40; 95% CI 6.6, 240). If a murmur was present over the right clavicle, but no more than two associated findings were present, then the examination was indeterminate (LR 1.8; 95% CI 0.93, 2.9). CONCLUSION: A clinical prediction rule, using simple bedside maneuvers, accurately ruled in and ruled out aortic stenosis
    corecore