35 research outputs found

    Autologous bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloblastic leukemia in Europe: further evidence of the role of marrow purging by mafosfamide. European Co-operative Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

    No full text
    Fifty-nine European teams have reported 919 autografts for the consolidation of acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) up to December 31, 1989. The distribution for autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) was 671 in first complete remission (CR1) and 196 in CR2. Pretransplantation regimes were: total-body irradiation (TBI), 456; busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BU-CY) 174; marrow purging with mafosfamide, 269 (corresponding to 26% of all patients in CR1 and 41% in CR2). Patients autografted in CR1 with no high risk factor (standard risk) had a leukemia-free survival (LFS) and relapse rate at 7 years of 48 +/- 2 and 41 +/- 3%, respectively. Of all the prognostic factors studied, only secondary leukemia was correlated with a poorer LFS (19 +/- 9% at 1 year) and a higher relapse rate (76 +/- 11%) (p less than 0.0001). For patients autografted in CR2, the LFS and relapse rate were 34 +/- 4 and 54 +/- 5%. With the restriction of a shorter follow-up, the results achieved with the BU-CY combinations (LFS and relapse rate at 3 years, CR1 47 +/- 6 and 45 +/- 7%; CR2, 37 +/- 9 and 50 +/- 10%) did not differ from those with TBI or other chemotherapy combinations. LFS and relapse rates were correlated with several pretransplant intervals: in CR1, patients reaching CR more rapidly (less than or equal to 40 days) had a better LFS (53 +/- 3 versus 42 +/- 3%; p = 0.03) and a lower relapse rate (46 +/- 3 versus 57 +/- 3%; p = 0.03). In patients autografted less than 3 months, 3-6 months and more than 6 months after CR, the LFS was 26 +/- 5, 49 +/- 3, and 55 +/- 4%, respectively, and the relapse rates 63 +/- 5, 38 +/- 3, and 36 +/- 4% (p less than 0.0001 for both). In CR2, patients autografted more than 18 months after the initial diagnosis had a better LFS (42 +/- 5 versus 24 +/- 5%; p less than 0.001) and a lower relapse rate (45 +/- 6 versus 65 +/- 6%; p less than 0.001). For those autografted less than 3 months, 3-6 months and more than 6 months after CR, the probability of LFS was 30 +/- 5, 30 +/- 7, and 50 +/- 9% (p = 0.06), respectively and the relapse rates 63 +/- 6, 50 +/- 8, and 36 +/- 8% (p = 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS

    Autologous Stem-cell Transplantation in Multiple-myeloma - Results of the European Group for Bone-marrow Transplantation

    No full text
    Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was used for treatment of 384 patients with multiple myeloma in 37 centers during the years 1986-1991. An analysis of prognostic factors was performed in 207 of these patients. One hundred forty one were males and 66 females, and median age was 49 years (range, 24-68). Actuarial survival at 78 months is 45%. Factors associated with a good prognosis were: response on chemotherapy immediately pretransplant, administration of only one treatment regimen, a low serum-beta(2)-Microglobulin value at diagnosis and the use of a conditioning regimen including melphalan. In a multivariate analysis, response status pretransplant, age <45 years, melphalan conditioning and non-TBI conditioning were independently predictive for longer survival, while transplantation after only one line of primary treatment and isotype other than light-chain were of borderline significance. Posttransplant alpha-interferon treatment was associated with improved survival in responsive patients. Eighteen patients treated in one center (Huddinge) passed a double autograft program, and 14 are in continuous complete remission ([CR]; n = 10) or good partial remission (n = 4) at a median time of 17 months after the first transplant (range, 2-38). In five CR patients, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)analysis of the clone-specific immunoglobulin-rearrangement was performed, and four are PCR-negative up to 33+ months after the first transplantation. We conclude that autografting in myeloma is most effective when applied early in the course of disease in younger, chemotherapy-responsive patients. Alpha-interferon maintenance treatment seems to be beneficial with respect to improved survival. Repeated cycles of high-dose chemo-radiotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue can induce a very high response rate, where the absence of minimal residual disease in CR patients has been demonstrated by the highly sensitive PCR-technique

    Progress in allogenic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a comparison between transplants performed 1983--93 and 1994--8 at European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centres.

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextOut of 690 allogeneic matched sibling donor transplants for multiple myeloma reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, 334 were performed during the period 1983-93 (all with bone marrow) and 356 during 1994-98 [223 with bone marrow and 133 with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs)]. The median overall survival was 10 months for patients transplanted during the earlier time period and 50 months for patients transplanted with hone marrow during the later period. The use of PBSCs was associated with earlier engraftment but no significant survival benefit compared to bone marrow transplants during the same time period. The improvement in survival since 1994 with the result of a significant reduction in transplant-related mortality, which was 38%, 21% and 25% at 6 months and 46%, 30% and 37% at 2 years during the earlier period, and the later period with bone marrow and PBSCs respectively. Reasons for the reduced transplant-related mortality appeared to be fewer deaths owing to bacterial and fungal infections and interstitial pneumonitis, in turn a result of earlier transplantation and less prior chemotherapy. Better supportive treatment and more frequent use of cytokines may also play a role. The improvement in survival was not directly related to the increased use of PBSCs

    Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation versus autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: A retrospective case-matched study from the European group for blood and marrow transplantation

    No full text
    A retrospective case-matched analysis was performed comparing 189 myeloma patients treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) with an equal number of patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Matching was performed with respect to gender and number of treatment lines before transplantation. The groups were comparable with the exception of median age (43 years for allo-BMT v 49 years for ASCT, P = .0001) and median posttransplant follow-up (46 months for allo-BMT v 30 months for ASCT, P = .0003). The overall survival was significantly better for ASCT than for allo-BMT, with a median survival of 34 months and 18 months, respectively (P = .001). However, this survival advantage was only observed in men, but not in women. The statistically significant survival advantage for ASCT was seen in most subgroups, ie, chemotherapy-responsive patients, patients who had received two or more treatment lines before transplantation, patients in partial remission, patients with an IgG-subtype, patients older than 46 years of age, patients with stage II disease, and patients with a low or high serum-beta-2-microglobulin at diagnosis. The main reason for the poorer survival in allo-BMT patients was higher transplant-related mortality (41% v 13% for ASCT, P = .0001), which was not compensated for by a lower rate of relapse and progression. However, in patients alive at 1 year posttransplant, there was a trend for better long-term survival (P = .09) and significantly better progression-free survival (P = .02) for allo-BMT as compared with ASCT. We conclude that the median survival is superior for ASCT. However, allo-BMT has a lower relapse rate, which results in a similar long-term outcome for both approaches, but a longer follow-up is needed to assess the final outcome. (C) 1996 by The American Society of Hematology
    corecore