Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis

Background Ultrasound (US) has largely replaced contrast venography as the definitive diagnostic test for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We aimed to derive a definitive estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of US for clinically suspected DVT and identify study-level factors that might predict accuracy. Methods We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic cohort studies that compared US to contrast venography in patients with suspected DVT. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Reviews of Effectiveness, the ACP Journal Club, and citation lists (1966 to April 2004). Random effects meta-analysis was used to derive pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Random effects meta-regression was used to identify study-level covariates that predicted diagnostic performance. Results We identified 100 cohorts comparing US to venography in patients with suspected DVT. Overall sensitivity for proximal DVT (95% confidence interval) was 94.2% (93.2 to 95.0), for distal DVT was 63.5% (59.8 to 67.0), and specificity was 93.8% (93.1 to 94.4). Duplex US had pooled sensitivity of 96.5% (95.1 to 97.6) for proximal DVT, 71.2% (64.6 to 77.2) for distal DVT and specificity of 94.0% (92.8 to 95.1). Triplex US had pooled sensitivity of 96.4% (94.4 to 97.1%) for proximal DVT, 75.2% (67.7 to 81.6) for distal DVT and specificity of 94.3% (92.5 to 95.8). Compression US alone had pooled sensitivity of 93.8 % (92.0 to 95.3%) for proximal DVT, 56.8% (49.0 to 66.4) for distal DVT and specificity of 97.8% (97.0 to 98.4). Sensitivity was higher in more recently published studies and in cohorts with higher prevalence of DVT and more proximal DVT, and was lower in cohorts that reported interpretation by a radiologist. Specificity was higher in cohorts that excluded patients with previous DVT. No studies were identified that compared repeat US to venography in all patients. Repeat US appears to have a positive yield of 1.3%, with 89% of these being confirmed by venography. Conclusion Combined colour-doppler US techniques have optimal sensitivity, while compression US has optimal specificity for DVT. However, all estimates are subject to substantial unexplained heterogeneity. The role of repeat scanning is very uncertain and based upon limited data

Juvenile temporal arteritis: A clinicopathological multicentric experience

INTRODUCTION: Juvenile temporal arteritis (JTA) is a recently-described and little-known inflammatory disease and its etiology is undetermined. Less than forty cases have been published. This paper is aimed at reporting the largest JTA series and to compare it to literature data to better evaluate its characteristics at diagnosis, its evolution and treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive multicentric study in France by identifying adult patients under the age of 50 which had a pathological temporal artery biopsy owing to the presence of a temporal arteritis. Patients with temporal arteritis as a manifestation of systemic vasculitis were excluded. RESULTS: We included 12 patients and the literature review identified 32 cases described in 27 articles, thus a total of 44 patients - 34 men and 10 women - with a median age of 30 and a maximum of 44. All patients presented either a lump in the temporal region or prominent temporal arteries, and 47.7% of patients suffered from headaches. Only 11.4% of patients presented general symptoms and 6.8% a biological inflammatory syndrome; 34.1% had peripheral blood eosinophilia; 83.7% presented a single episode and complete excision without further treatment was documented for 72.7%. Pathology analysis revealed infiltrate of inflammatory cells in the arterial wall in 97.6% of patients but also sparse giant cells for 25% and granuloma for 22.9%, perivascular extension of the inflammation for 82.6%, and presence of lymphoid follicles or germinal centres for 60%. Clinical relapses were present in 16.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: JTA is a rare, localized and benign disease. The majority of cases have only one episode which is cured by local surgery