Parameterization, Analysis, and Risk Management in a Comprehensive Management System with Emphasis on Energy and Performance (ISO 50001: 2018)

[EN] The future of business development relies on the effective management of risks, opportunities, and energy and water resources. Here, we evaluate the application of best practices to identify, analyze, address, monitor, and control risks and opportunities (R/O) according to ISO 31000 and 50000. Furthermore, we shed light on tools, templates, ISO guides, and international documents that contribute to classifying, identifying, formulating control, and managing R/O parameterization in a comprehensive management system model, namely CMS QHSE3+, which consists of quality (Q), health and safety (HS), environmental management (E), energy efficiency (E2), and other risk components (+) that include comprehensive biosecurity and biosafety. By focusing on the deployment of R/O-based thinking (ROBT) at strategic and operational levels, we show vulnerability reduction in CMS QHSE3+ by managing energy, efficiency, and sustainability.We express our gratitude for the support from Cajacopi Atlantico, QUARA Technology, ASTEQ Technology, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and to all the personnel and companies who offered us their contributions and their valuable points of view.Poveda-Orjuela, PP.; García-Díaz, JC.; Pulido-Rojano, A.; Cañón-Zabala, G. (2020). Parameterization, Analysis, and Risk Management in a Comprehensive Management System with Emphasis on Energy and Performance (ISO 50001: 2018). Energies. 13(21):1-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215579S1441321SDBS Business Demography Indicatorshttps://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=70734The World Economy on a Tightrope. OECD Economic Outlook, June 2020http://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/Strategic Plan 2016–2020www.https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/august/tradoc_154919.pdfSMEs, and Their Business Problems. Case Analysishttps://www.redalyc.org/pdf/206/20605209.pdfMuñoz, P. (2013). The Distinctive Importance of Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Current Opinion in Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(1). doi:10.11565/cuocient.v2i1.26Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510-523. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.005Chaos Report 2015http://www.laboratorioti.com/2016/05/16/informe-del-caos-2015-chaos-report-2015/Dirección de Marketing. Ciudad de México: Pearson and Prentice Hall, 12a Ediciónhttp://biblio.econ.uba.ar/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/tc/148262_TC.pdfPoveda-Orjuela, P. P., García-Díaz, J. C., Pulido-Rojano, A., & Cañón-Zabala, G. (2019). ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus. Energies, 12(24), 4700. doi:10.3390/en12244700Continuity Planning for Your Businesshttps://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/help/disaster/WBC_business_continuity_planning_covid-19_checklist.pdfCOVID-19: Five Ways to Maintain Continuity and Reshape for Resiliencehttps://www.ey.com/en_be/transactions/companies-can-reshape-results-and-plan-forcovid-19-recoveryAven, T. (2012). The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 33-44. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006Oliva, F. L. (2016). A maturity model for enterprise risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 66-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.007Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2011). Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(1), 64-74. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.001The ISO 27k Forumhttps://www.iso27001security.com/html/iso27000.htmlKaya, İ. (2017). Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 379-389. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_26Barafort, B., Mesquida, A.-L., & Mas, A. (2017). Integrating risk management in IT settings from ISO standards and management systems perspectives. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 54, 176-185. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.010Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023Thekdi, S., & Aven, T. (2016). An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.010Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2013). Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1164-1172. doi:10.1111/risa.12132Labodová, A. (2004). Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 571-580. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.08.008World trends and the future of Latin America; ECLAC UNIDO, 2016–Public Management Series, No 85. ISSN 1680-8827, LC/L.4246 LC/IP/L.348https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40788/S1600740_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yBudhi, M. K. S., Lestari, N. P. N. E., Suasih, N. N. R., & Wijaya, P. Y. (2020). Strategies and policies for developing SMEs based on creative economy. Management Science Letters, 2301-2310. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2020.3.005Melly, D., & Hanrahan, J. (2020). Tourism biosecurity risk management and planning: an international comparative analysis and implications for Ireland. Tourism Review, 76(1), 88-102. doi:10.1108/tr-07-2019-0312Guide for Business Continuity during COVID-19http://www.andi.com.co/Uploads.pdfLa Danse, 1910. Musee de l’Hermitage, Saint-Pétersbourg, Russie. Consulté le 28 Juillet 2020https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/Uriarte-Romero, R., Gil-Samaniego, M., Valenzuela-Mondaca, E., & Ceballos-Corral, J. (2017). Methodology for the Successful Integration of an Energy Management System to an Operational Environmental System. Sustainability, 9(8), 1304. doi:10.3390/su9081304Cosgrove, J., Littlewood, J., & Wilgeroth, P. (2017). Development of a framework of key performance indicators to identify reductions in energy consumption in a medical devices production facility. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 39(2), 202-210. doi:10.1080/01430750.2017.1278718Wu, J., Cheng, B., Wang, M., & Chen, J. (2017). Quality-Aware Energy Optimization in Wireless Video Communication With Multipath TCP. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(5), 2701-2718. doi:10.1109/tnet.2017.2701153Biosecurity. Madridhttps://www.insst.es/-/bioseguridadArvanitis, S., Loukis, E., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2013). The effect of soft ICT capital on innovation performance of Greek firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(6), 679-701. doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2013-0048ICT in small firms: Factors affecting the adoption and use of ICT in Southeast England SMEshttps://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2008/167Legg, S. J., Olsen, K. B., Laird, I. S., & Hasle, P. (2015). Managing safety in small and medium enterprises. Safety Science, 71, 189-196. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.007Podgórski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system – A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety Science, 73, 146-166. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018Cagno, E., Micheli, G. J. L., Masi, D., & Jacinto, C. (2013). Economic evaluation of OSH and its way to SMEs: A constructive review. Safety Science, 53, 134-152. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.016Badri, A., Gbodossou, A., & Nadeau, S. (2012). Occupational health and safety risks: Towards the integration into project management. Safety Science, 50(2), 190-198. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.008Carlson, R., Erixon, M., Forsberg, P., & Pålsson, A.-C. (2001). System for integrated business environmental information management. Advances in Environmental Research, 5(4), 369-375. doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(01)00088-0Florio, C., & Leoni, G. (2017). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 56-74. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003Aven, T., & Ylönen, M. (2018). A risk interpretation of sociotechnical safety perspectives. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 175, 13-18. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.004Skorupinska, A., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2017). ICT, Innovation and Productivity: Evidence Based on Eastern European Manufacturing Companies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 768-788. doi:10.1007/s13132-016-0441-1Benitez‐Amado, J., Llorens‐Montes, F. J., & Nieves Perez‐Arostegui, M. (2010). Information technology‐enabled intrapreneurship culture and firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4), 550-566. doi:10.1108/02635571011039025González-Posada, D. M., & Reyes-Bedoya, N. (2019). Herramientas de gestión al alcance: caso red de hostales de la ciudad de Medellín. Revista CEA, 5(9), 113-129. doi:10.22430/24223182.1261Hernandis Ortuño, B., & Briede Westermeyer, J. C. (2009). AN EDUCATIONAL APPLICATION FOR A PRODUCT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS USING INTEGRATED CONCEPTUAL MODELS. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 17(3). doi:10.4067/s0718-3305200900030001

ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus

[EN] Business progress and human development are linked to the efficient management of energy resources. The research in this paper contributes to the generalized application of good practices that reduce the vulnerability of companies. The research focuses on energy efficiency through comprehensive management systems (CMS), and "thought based on risks and opportunities", considering the discussion about the revision of ISO 50001:2018, the basic approach of the model and the route to implement CMS for quality, safety and health in the workplace, environmental management, energy efficiency, and other risk components. This implementation route, with the acronym CMS QHSE3+, places special emphasis on the functions of strategic planning, operational and risk management, and controls, as well as on deliverables and references to examples, templates, standards, and documents, to facilitate its application general in small and medium enterprises and in the management of energy efficiency.We express our gratitude for the support received, to CAJACOPI ATLÁNTICO, QUARA Group, ASTEQ Technology, Simón Bolivar University, the Universitat Politècnica de València, SANTO TORIBIO Business Group, and to all the personalities and companies who offered us their contributions and their valuable points of view.Poveda-Orjuela, PP.; García-Díaz, JC.; Pulido-Rojano, A.; Cañón-Zabala, G. (2019). ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus. Energies. 12(24):1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244700S1331224Strategic Business Plan 2017https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/687806/ISO_ TC_301_Energy_management_and_energy_saving.pdf?nodeid=19278553&vernum=-2Directives and Policies Ninth Edition, Part 2. Official Rules to Develop an ISO Standardwww.iso.org/directives-and-policies.htmlStandards by ISO/TC 301https://www.iso.org/committee/6077221.htmlCEM Advancing Clean Energy Together, Ministerial Meetingshttps://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/events-Clean-Energy-Ministerial. CEM 01 to CEM 10Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development OECDhttps://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=70734Strategic Plan 2016–2020. Bruxelles: CEEhttps://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/august/tradoc_154919.pdfChaos Reporthttp://www.laboratorioti.com /2016/05/16/informe-del-caos-2015-chaos-report-2015-bien-malfueron-los-proyectos-ano-2015/Oliva, F. L. (2016). A maturity model for enterprise risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 66-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.007Thekdi, S., & Aven, T. (2016). An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.010Aven, T., & Krohn, B. S. (2014). A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.005Wilson, J. P., & Campbell, L. (2018). ISO 9001:2015: the evolution and convergence of quality management and knowledge management for competitive advantage. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(7-8), 761-776. doi:10.1080/14783363.2018.1445965Ciravegna Martins da Fonseca, L. M. (2015). ISO 14001:2015: An improved tool for sustainability. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(1). doi:10.3926/jiem.1298Cosgrove, J., Littlewood, J., & Wilgeroth, P. (2017). Development of a framework of key performance indicators to identify reductions in energy consumption in a medical devices production facility. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 39(2), 202-210. doi:10.1080/01430750.2017.1278718Castrillón Mendoza, R., Rey Hernández, J., Velasco Gómez, E., San José Alonso, J., & Rey Martínez, F. (2018). Analysis of the Methodology to Obtain Several Key Indicators Performance (KIP), by Energy Retrofitting of the Actual Building to the District Heating Fuelled by Biomass, Focusing on nZEB Goal: Case of Study. Energies, 12(1), 93. doi:10.3390/en12010093Chiu, T.-Y., Lo, S.-L., & Tsai, Y.-Y. (2012). Establishing an Integration-Energy-Practice Model for Improving Energy Performance Indicators in ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems. Energies, 5(12), 5324-5339. doi:10.3390/en5125324Laskurain, I., Ibarloza, A., Larrea, A., & Allur, E. (2017). Contribution to Energy Management of the Main Standards for Environmental Management Systems: The Case of ISO 14001 and EMAS. Energies, 10(11), 1758. doi:10.3390/en10111758Al-Sakkaf, S., Kassas, M., Khalid, M., & Abido, M. A. (2019). An Energy Management System for Residential Autonomous DC Microgrid Using Optimized Fuzzy Logic Controller Considering Economic Dispatch. Energies, 12(8), 1457. doi:10.3390/en12081457Zobel, T., & Malmgren, C. (2016). Evaluating the Management System Approach for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvements. Energies, 9(10), 774. doi:10.3390/en9100774Laskurain, I., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Casadesús, M. (2015). Fostering renewable energy sources by standards for environmental and energy management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1148-1156. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.050Stoeglehner, G., Niemetz, N., & Kettl, K.-H. (2011). Spatial dimensions of sustainable energy systems: new visions for integrated spatial and energy planning. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 1(1). doi:10.1186/2192-0567-1-2Calvillo, C. F., Sánchez-Miralles, A., & Villar, J. (2016). Energy management and planning in smart cities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 273-287. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.133Blaauwbroek, N., Nguyen, P. H., Konsman, M. J., Shi, H., Kamphuis, R. I. G., & Kling, W. L. (2015). Decentralized Resource Allocation and Load Scheduling for Multicommodity Smart Energy Systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6(4), 1506-1514. doi:10.1109/tste.2015.2441107Mao, M., Jin, P., Hatziargyriou, N. D., & Chang, L. (2014). Multiagent-Based Hybrid Energy Management System for Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 1-1. doi:10.1109/tste.2014.2313882Carli, R., & Dotoli, M. (2019). Decentralized control for residential energy management of a smart users microgrid with renewable energy exchange. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 6(3), 641-656. doi:10.1109/jas.2019.1911462The ISO 27k Forumhttps://www.iso27001 security.com/html/iso27000.htmlIntroduction to the Basic Concepts of General Systems Theory. Cinta de Moebiohttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10100306Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science, 111(2872), 23-29. doi:10.1126/science.111.2872.23Hernandis Ortuño, B., & Briede Westermeyer, J. C. (2009). AN EDUCATIONAL APPLICATION FOR A PRODUCT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS USING INTEGRATED CONCEPTUAL MODELS. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 17(3). doi:10.4067/s0718-33052009000300017Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160-180. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001Conceptual Model and Route to Implement a Comprehensive Management System QHSE3+, in New Trends in Operations Research and Administrative Sciences. An Approach from Latin American Studieshttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/handle/20.500.12442/2601Golini, R., Kalchschmidt, M., & Landoni, P. (2015). Adoption of project management practices: The impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 650-663. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.006Marcelino-Sádaba, S., González-Jaen, L. F., & Pérez-Ezcurdia, A. (2015). Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020Archer, N. ., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207-216. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00032-5Velásquez-Restrepo, S. M., Londoño-Gallego, J. A., López-Romero, C., & Vahos, J. D. (2018). Desarrollo de una plataforma web multimedial para la elaboración de proyectos bajo la metodología de marco lógico. Lámpsakos, 1(18), 12. doi:10.21501/21454086.2601Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 363-373. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00060-1San Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and Project Management: A General Overview. Complexity, 2018, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2018/4891286Ramasesh, R. V., & Browning, T. R. (2014). A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management. Journal of Operations Management, 32(4), 190-204. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.003Pollack, J. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 266-274. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.002Lamers, M. (2002). Do you manage a project, or what? A reply to «Do you manage work, deliverables or resources», International Journal of Project Management, April 2000. International Journal of Project Management, 20(4), 325-329. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(00)00053-3Torabi, S. A., Giahi, R., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2016). An enhanced risk assessment framework for business continuity management systems. Safety Science, 89, 201-218. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.015Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25-32. doi:10.1177/875697289903000405Casals, M., Gangolells, M., Forcada, N., Macarulla, M., Giretti, A., & Vaccarini, M. (2016). SEAM4US: An intelligent energy management system for underground stations. Applied Energy, 166, 150-164. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.029Matrawy, K. K., Mahrous, A.-F., & Youssef, M. S. (2015). Energy management and parametric optimization of an integrated PV solar house. Energy Conversion and Management, 96, 377-383. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.088Kyriakarakos, G., Dounis, A. I., Arvanitis, K. G., & Papadakis, G. (2012). A fuzzy logic energy management system for polygeneration microgrids. Renewable Energy, 41, 315-327. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.019Johansson, M. T., & Thollander, P. (2018). A review of barriers to and driving forces for improved energy efficiency in Swedish industry– Recommendations for successful in-house energy management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 618-628. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.052Jovanović, B., & Filipović, J. (2016). ISO 50001 standard-based energy management maturity model – proposal and validation in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2744-2755. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.023Majernik, M., Bosak, M., Stofova, L., & Szaryszova, P. (2015). INNOVATIVE MODEL OF INTEGRATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN COMPANIES. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(1). doi:10.12776/qip.v19i1.384Implementation of ISO 50001 in Industry in The Netherlands. ECEE Industry Summer Studywww.eceee.orgDe Groot, H. L. F., Verhoef, E. T., & Nijkamp, P. (2001). Energy saving by firms: decision-making, barriers and policies. Energy Economics, 23(6), 717-740. doi:10.1016/s0140-9883(01)00083-4Development of the EMAS Sectoral Reference Documents on Best Environmental Management Practice. Learning from Frontrunners Promoting Best Practice. Publications Office of the European Unionhttps://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC84966/lfna26291enn.pd

ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus

Business progress and human development are linked to the efficient management of energy resources. The research in this paper contributes to the generalized application of good practices that reduce the vulnerability of companies. The research focuses on energy efficiency through comprehensive management systems (CMS), and “thought based on risks and opportunities”, considering the discussion about the revision of ISO 50001:2018, the basic approach of the model and the route to implement CMS for quality, safety and health in the workplace, environmental management, energy efficiency, and other risk components. This implementation route, with the acronym CMS QHSE3+, places special emphasis on the functions of strategic planning, operational and risk management, and controls, as well as on deliverables and references to examples, templates, standards, and documents, to facilitate its application general in small and medium enterprises and in the management of energy efficiency

An Integral, Risk and Energy Approach in Management Systems. Analysis of ISO 50001: 2018

Business progress and human development are linked to the effective management and saving of energy resources. The ISO 50000 family of standards provides practices for the utilization, savings, efficiency and continuous improvement in energy performance, while the ISO 50001 establishes the requirements for an energy management system (EnMS). This document presents i) the main topics of the ISO 50001:2018 and other areas not included in its review; ii) the need for organizations to have a comprehensive model with a risk focus for the rational implementation of management systems that fulfil the practices of energy efficiency, in conjunction with quality, safety, health at work and environmental management, among others; iii) the proposed focus for the conceptual model and the implementation route of a comprehensive management system, "QHSE3+" (Q = quality management (ISO 9001: 2015), HS = health and safety at work (ISO 45001: 2018), E = environmental management (ISO 14001: 2015), E2 = energy efficiency (ISO 50001: 2011) and + = other components of risk), which contributes to the sustainable success of organizations by reducing the vulnerabilities and risks associated with the categories in the acronym QHSE3+.