Effect of three anaesthetic techniques on isometric skeletal muscle strength

Background. Our aim was to quantify human involuntary isometric skeletal muscle strength during anaesthesia with propofol, sevoflurane, or spinal anaesthesia using bupivacaine. Methods. Thirty‐three healthy patients undergoing anaesthesia for elective lower limb surgery were investigated. Twenty‐two patients received a general anaesthetic with either propofol (n=12) or sevoflurane (n=10); for the remaining 11 patients spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine was used. We used a non‐invasive muscle force assessment system before and during anaesthesia to determine the contractile properties of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles after peroneal nerve stimulation (single, double, triple, and quadruple stimulation). We measured peak torques; contraction times; peak rates of torque development and decay; times to peak torque development and decay; half‐relaxation times; torque latencies. Results. Males elicited greater peak torques than females, medians 6.3 vs 4.4 Nm, respectively (P=0.0002, Mann‐Whitney rank‐sum test). During sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia, muscle strength did not differ from pre‐anaesthetic values. During spinal anaesthesia, torques were diminished for single‐pulse stimulation from 3.5 to 2.0 Nm (P=0.002, Wilcoxon signed rank test), and for double‐pulse from 7.6 to 5.6 Nm (P=0.02). Peak rates of torque development decreased for single‐pulse stimulation from 113 to 53 Nm s-1 and for double pulse from 195 to 105 Nm s-1. Torque latencies were increased during spinal anaesthesia. Conclusions. At clinically relevant concentrations, propofol and sevoflurane did not influence involuntary isometric skeletal muscle strength in adults, whereas spinal anaesthesia reduced strength by about 20%. Muscle strength assessment using a device such as described here provided reliable results and should be considered for use in other scientific investigations to identify potential effects of anaesthetic agents. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 367-7

Insights from echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and microcomputed tomography relative to the mid-myocardial left ventricular echogenic zone.

Background: The anatomical substrate for the mid-mural ventricular hyperechogenic zone remains uncertain, but it may represent no more than ultrasound reflected from cardiomyocytes orientated orthogonally to the ultrasonic beam. We sought to ascertain the relationship between the echogenic zone and the orientation of the cardiomyocytes. Methods: We used 3D echocardiography, diffusion tensor imaging, and microcomputed tomography to analyze the location and orientation of cardiomyocytes within the echogenic zone. Results: We demonstrated that visualization of the echogenic zone is dependent on the position of the transducer and is most clearly seen from the apical window. Diffusion tensor imaging and microcomputed tomography show that the echogenic zone seen from the apical window corresponds to the position of the circumferentially orientated cardiomyocytes. An oblique band seen in the parasternal view relates to cardiomyocytes orientated orthogonally to the ultrasonic beam. Conclusions: The mid-mural ventricular hyperechogenic zone represents reflected ultrasound from cardiomyocytes aligned orthogonal to the ultrasonic beam. The echogenic zone does not represent a space, a connective tissue sheet, a boundary between ascending and descending limbs of a hypothetical helical ventricular myocardial band, nor an abrupt change in cardiomyocyte orientation

Insights from echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and microcomputed tomography relative to the mid-myocardial left ventricular echogenic zone.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical substrate for the mid-mural ventricular hyperechogenic zone remains uncertain, but it may represent no more than ultrasound reflected from cardiomyocytes orientated orthogonally to the ultrasonic beam. We sought to ascertain the relationship between the echogenic zone and the orientation of the cardiomyocytes. METHODS: We used 3D echocardiography, diffusion tensor imaging, and microcomputed tomography to analyze the location and orientation of cardiomyocytes within the echogenic zone. RESULTS: We demonstrated that visualization of the echogenic zone is dependent on the position of the transducer and is most clearly seen from the apical window. Diffusion tensor imaging and microcomputed tomography show that the echogenic zone seen from the apical window corresponds to the position of the circumferentially orientated cardiomyocytes. An oblique band seen in the parasternal view relates to cardiomyocytes orientated orthogonally to the ultrasonic beam. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-mural ventricular hyperechogenic zone represents reflected ultrasound from cardiomyocytes aligned orthogonal to the ultrasonic beam. The echogenic zone does not represent a space, a connective tissue sheet, a boundary between ascending and descending limbs of a hypothetical helical ventricular myocardial band, nor an abrupt change in cardiomyocyte orientation