Post-Covid-19 Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Objectives The long-term consequences of COVID-19 infection on the gastrointestinal tract remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and post-COVID-19 disorders of gut-brain interaction after hospitalisation for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicentre, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were evaluated on hospital admission and after 1, 6 and 12 months post hospitalisation. Gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed using validated questionnaires. Results The study included 2183 hospitalised patients. The primary analysis included a total of 883 patients (614 patients with COVID-19 and 269 controls) due to the exclusion of patients with pre-existing gastrointestinal symptoms and/or surgery. At enrolment, gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent among patients with COVID-19 than in the control group (59.3% vs 39.7%, p < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, constipation and hard stools were significantly more prevalent in controls than in patients with COVID-19 (16% vs 9.6%, p=0.019 and 17.7% vs 10.9%, p=0.011, respectively). Compared with controls, patients with COVID-19 reported higher rates of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to Rome IV criteria: 0.5% versus 3.2%, p=0.045. Factors significantly associated with IBS diagnosis included history of allergies, chronic intake of proton pump inhibitors and presence of dyspnoea. At the 6-month follow-up, the rate of patients with COVID-19 fulfilling the criteria for depression was higher than among controls. Conclusion Compared with controls, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 had fewer problems of constipation and hard stools at 12 months after acute infection. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of IBS than controls

Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project

The main aim of the present study was to do an update on studies on headache epidemiology as a preparation for the multinational European study on the prevalence and burden of headache and investigate the impact of different methodological issues on the results. The study was based on a previous study, and a systematic literature search was performed to identify the newest studies. More than 50% of adults indicate that they suffer from headache in general during the last year or less, but when asked specifically about tension-type headache, the prevalence was 60%. Migraine occurs in 15%, chronic headache in about 4% and possible medication overuse headache in 1–2%. Cluster headache has a lifetime prevalence of 0.2–0.3%. Most headaches are more prevalent in women, and somewhat less prevalent in children and youth. Some studies indicate that the headache prevalence is increasing during the last decades in Europe. As to methodological issues, lifetime prevalences are in general higher than 1-year prevalences, but the exact time frame of headache (1 year, 6 or 3 months, or no time frame stated) seems to be of less importance. Studies using personal interviews seem to give somewhat higher prevalences than those using questionnaires

Overview of diagnosis and management of paediatric headache. Part I: diagnosis

Headache is the most common somatic complaint in children and adolescents. The evaluation should include detailed history of children and adolescents completed by detailed general and neurological examinations. Moreover, the possible role of psychological factors, life events and excessively stressful lifestyle in influencing recurrent headache need to be checked. The choice of laboratory tests rests on the differential diagnosis suggested by the history, the character and temporal pattern of the headache, and the physical and neurological examinations. Subjects who have any signs or symptoms of focal/progressive neurological disturbances should be investigated by neuroimaging techniques. The electroencephalogram and other neurophysiological examinations are of limited value in the routine evaluation of headaches. In a primary headache disorder, headache itself is the illness and headache is not attributed to any other disorder (e.g. migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache and other trigeminal autonomic cephalgias). In secondary headache disorders, headache is the symptom of identifiable structural, metabolic or other abnormality. Red flags include the first or worst headache ever in the life, recent headache onset, increasing severity or frequency, occipital location, awakening from sleep because of headache, headache occurring exclusively in the morning associated with severe vomiting and headache associated with straining. Thus, the differential diagnosis between primary and secondary headaches rests mainly on clinical criteria. A thorough evaluation of headache in children and adolescents is necessary to make the correct diagnosis and initiate treatment, bearing in mind that children with headache are more likely to experience psychosocial adversity and to grow up with an excess of both headache and other physical and psychiatric symptoms and this creates an important healthcare problem for their future life

Comparison between the use of adsorbed and aqueous immunotherapy material in dermatophagoides pteronyssinus sensitive asthmatic children

PubMedID: 10611556Background: dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der Pl) is the major allergen which causes allergic asthma and perennial rhinitis. The extracts of Der Pl may be used in treatment of patients who are unresponsive to pharmacological treatment and avoidance of allergens. The success of immunotherapy (IT) depends on the selection of appropriate patients and allergens as well as a regular follow up. Objective: three different groups of IT materials and a placebo were tested on 34 patients with Der Pl sensitive asthma. Clinical evaluations of allergen challenge and in vitro immunologic tests were made on the 6th month and at the end of the second year of IT. The results were compared to the placebo treated group. Results: there were no significant differences among the groups in regard to age, sex and duration of illness. The time required for reaching the maintenance dose for group I (Alutard®), II (APSI retard Ca®) and III (Greer®) was 15.40 ± 0.69, 18.2 ± 4.0 and 108 ± 33 weeks, respectively. Even though there was some significant difference between those receiving aqueous IT and the placebo (p 0.05), but significant differences was found between group III and the other two groups (p 0.05). No significant correlation was found between (1) spIgE and the symptom medication score (SMS) (2) spIgE and spIgG4 (3), DSPT and BPT. A significant positive correlation was found between the maximum tolerated dose with DSPT and increase in spIgG4 (r = 0.33, p = 0.046). A negative correlation was found between SMS and spIG4 (p = 0.012, r = -0.42) after IT. Conclusion: SIT with Der Pl is an effective and reliable treatment in allergic asthmatic children. Adsorbed extracts may be preferable to in childhood because of effectively, safety, tolerability and, fewer numbers of injection. The best IgG4 response and velocity of maintenance doses achieved was found in group I. Easy, cheap and safe parameters such a SMS and DSPT can be useful for a follow-up of SIT. Further investigation is required to determine which one of the products is the best

Is there any prognostic significance in pleural involvement and/or effusion (Ple-I/E) in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC?

44th Congress of the European-Society-for-Medical-Oncology (ESMO) -- SEP 27-OCT 01, 2019 -- Barcelona, SPAINCicin, Irfan/0000-0002-7584-3868;WOS: 000491295504209[No abstract available]European Soc Med Oncol, Japanese Soc Med Onco