Dissection of a Krox20 positive feedback loop driving cell fate choices in hindbrain patterning

Although feedback loops are essential in development, their molecular implementation and precise functions remain elusive. Using enhancer knockout in mice, we demonstrate that a direct, positive autoregulatory loop amplifies and maintains the expression of Krox20, a transcription factor governing vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. By combining quantitative data collected in the zebrafish with biophysical modelling that accounts for the intrinsic stochastic molecular dynamics, we dissect the loop at the molecular level. We find that it underpins a bistable switch that turns a transient input signal into cell fate commitment, as we observe in single cell analyses. The stochasticity of the activation process leads to a graded input–output response until saturation is reached. Consequently, the duration and strength of the input signal controls the size of the hindbrain segments by modulating the distribution between the two cell fates. Moreover, segment formation is buffered from severe variations in input level. Finally, the progressive extinction of Krox20 expression involves a destabilization of the loop by repressor molecules. These mechanisms are of general significance for cell type specification and tissue patterning

Chimeric oncogene regulates the EGR2 sarcoma susceptibility gene via a GGAA-microsatellite

International audienceDeciphering the ways in which somatic mutations and germline susceptibility variants cooperate to promote cancer is challenging. Ewing sarcoma is characterized by fusions between EWSR1 and members of the ETS gene family, usually EWSR1-FLI1, leading to the generation of oncogenic transcription factors that bind DNA at GGAA motifs. A recent genome-wide association study identified susceptibility variants near EGR2. Here we found that EGR2 knockdown inhibited proliferation, clonogenicity and spheroidal growth in vitro and induced regression of Ewing sarcoma xenografts. Targeted germline deep sequencing of the EGR2 locus in affected subjects and controls identified 291 Ewing-associated SNPs. At rs79965208, the A risk allele connected adjacent GGAA repeats by converting an interspaced GGAT motif into a GGAA motif, thereby increasing the number of consecutive GGAA motifs and thus the EWSR1-FLI1-dependent enhancer activity of this sequence, with epigenetic characteristics of an active regulatory element. EWSR1-FLI1 preferentially bound to the A risk allele, which increased global and allele-specific EGR2 expression. Collectively, our findings establish cooperation between a dominant oncogene and a susceptibility variant that regulates a major driver of Ewing sarcomagenesi

The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development.

The Eph receptors are the largest known family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Initially all of them were identified as orphan receptors without known ligands, and their specific functions were not well understood. During the past few years, a corresponding family of ligands has been identified, called the ephrins, and specific functions have now been identified in neural development. The ephrins and Eph receptors are implicated as positional labels that may guide the development of neural topographic maps. They have also been implicated in pathway selection by axons, the guidance of cell migration, and the establishment of regional pattern in the nervous system. The ligands are anchored to cell surfaces, and most of the functions so far identified can be interpreted as precise guidance of cell or axon movement. This large family of ligands and receptors may make a major contribution to the accurate spatial patterning of connections and cell position in the nervous system.Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

PIASxβ acts as an activator of Hoxb1 and is antagonized by Krox20 during hindbrain segmentation

The zinc-finger transcription factor Krox20 constitutes a key regulator of hindbrain development, essential for the formation and specification of rhombomeres (r) 3 and 5. It is in particular responsible for the respective activation and repression of odd- and even-numbered rhombomere-specific genes, which include Hox genes. In this study, we have identified PIASxβ as a novel direct interactor of Krox20. In addition, we found that PIASxβ is able to activate the r4-specific gene Hoxb1. Binding of Krox20 prevents this activation, providing a molecular basis for the repression of Hoxb1 by Krox20. The same domain in the Krox20 protein, the zinc-fingers, is involved in DNA binding for transcriptional activation and in interaction with PIASxβ for transcriptional repression, although the actual precise contacts are different. Our findings add an additional level in the complexity of Hox gene regulation and provide an example of how a single regulator can coordinate the activation and repression of a set of genes by very different mechanisms, acting as a molecular switch to specify cell identity and fate