231 research outputs found
Michel PĂȘcheux: entre o Ăłbvio e o nome complexo
Este estudo tem o objetivo de tecer um conjunto de consideraçÔes acerca de partes iniciais da obra SemĂąntica e Discurso: uma crĂtica Ă afirmação do Ăłbvio, do autor Michel PĂȘcheux, considerado o fundador da AnĂĄlise de Discurso de linha francesa. Dentre todas as questĂ”es que sĂŁo tematizadas sobre PĂȘcheux por aqueles que o estudam e o tomam como fundamento teĂłrico, as duas de que trato1 neste trabalho parecem nĂŁo ter sido fonte de reflexĂŁo ou de maior problematização. Elas se referem ao lugar (nĂŁo lugar ou fora de lugar) da SemĂąntica, que afirmaria o Ăłbvio, e Ă escolha das oraçÔes adjetivas como problema âlinguĂsticoâ para a constituição/demonstração da Teoria do Discurso. Busco refletir sobre como estas duas questĂ”es entram nas reflexĂ”es de PĂȘcheux e tento, com isso, contribuir de alguma forma com o leitor que pode ter algum auxĂlio para a leitura da obra citada
Biosemiotics, politics and Th.A. Sebeokâs move from linguistics to semiotics
This paper will focus on the political implications for the language sciences of Sebeokâs move from linguistics to a global semiotic perspective, a move that ultimately resulted in biosemiotics. The paper will seek to make more explicit the political bearing of a biosemiotic perspective in the language sciences and the human sciences in general. In particular, it will discuss the definition of language inherent in Sebeokâs project and the fundamental re-drawing of the grounds of linguistic debate heralded by Sebeokâs embrace of the concept of modelling. Thus far, the political co-ordinates of the biosemiotic project have not really been made explicit. This paper will therefore seek to outline
1. how biosemiotics enables us to reconfigure our understanding of the role of language in culture;
2. how exaptation is central to the evolution of language and communication, rather than adaptation;
3. how communication is the key issue in biosphere, rather than language, not just because communication includes language but because the language sciences often refer to language as if it were mere âchatterâ, âtropesâ and âfigures of speechâ;
4. how biosemiotics, despite its seeming âneutralityâ arising from its transdisciplinarity, is thoroughly political;
5. how the failure to see the implications of the move from linguistics to semiotics arises from the fact that biosemiotics is devoid of old style politics, which is based on representation (devoid of experience) and âconstruction of [everything] in discourseâ (which is grounded in linguistics, not communication study).
In contrast to the post-âlinguistic turnâ idea that the world is âconstructed in discourseâ, we will argue that biosemiotics entails a reconfiguration of the polis and, in particular, offers the chance to completely reconceptualise ideology
- âŠ