The value of detailed first-trimester ultrasound in the era of noninvasive prenatal testing.

Background:&nbsp;In 2020, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended noninvasive prenatal testing be offered to all patients. However, current societal guidelines in the United States do not universally recommend a detailed first-trimester ultrasound.Objective:&nbsp;This study aimed to determine the additional findings identified through first-trimester ultrasound that would have otherwise been missed if noninvasive prenatal testing was used alone as a first-trimester screening method.Study design:&nbsp;This was a retrospective cohort study involving 2158 pregnant patients and 2216 fetuses that were seen at a single medical center between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. All those included underwent both noninvasive prenatal testing and detailed first-trimester ultrasound between 11.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation. Noninvasive prenatal testing results were categorized as low risk or high risk, and first-trimester ultrasound results were categorized as normal or abnormal. Abnormal first-trimester ultrasounds were further classified as first-trimester screening markers (increased nuchal translucency, absent nasal bone, tricuspid regurgitation, and ductus venosus reverse a-wave) or structural defects (the cranium, neck, heart, thorax, abdominal wall, stomach, kidneys, bladder, spine, and extremities). Descriptive statistics were used to report our findings.Results:&nbsp;Of 2216 fetuses, 65 (3.0%) had a high-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result, whereas 2151 (97.0%) had a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result. Of those with a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result, 2035 (94.6%) had a normal first-trimester ultrasound, whereas 116 (5.4%) had at least 1 abnormal finding on first-trimester ultrasound. The most common screening marker detected within the low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing group was absent nasal bone (52/2151 [2.4%]), followed by reversed a-wave of the ductus venosus (30/2151 [1.4%]). The most common structural defect in this group was cardiac abnormality (15/2151 [0.7%]). Overall, 181 fetuses were identified as having "abnormal screening" through either a high-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result (n=65) or through a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result but abnormal first-trimester ultrasound (n=116). In summary, the incorporation of first-trimester ultrasound screening identified 116 additional fetuses (5.4%) that required further follow-up and surveillance than noninvasive prenatal testing alone would have identified.Conclusion:&nbsp;Detailed first-trimester ultrasound identified more fetuses with a potential abnormality than noninvasive prenatal testing alone. Therefore, first-trimester ultrasound remains a valuable screening method that should be used in combination with noninvasive prenatal testing.Keywords:&nbsp;congenital anomalies; early ultrasound; noninvasive prenatal testing; prenatal diagnosis; prenatal screening.</p

Ultrasonographic evaluation of myometrial thickness in twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate longitudinally the in vivo changes in myometrial thickness (MT) during gestation in patients carrying twin gestations in relation to pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Serial abdominal ultrasounds were performed prospectively in 92 patients carrying twin gestations through each trimester. Ninty-seven patients pregnant with singletons served as controls. For twins, the primary endpoint was spontaneous delivery at less than 35 weeks' gestational age (GA). The myometrium was defined sonographically as the echohomogeneous layer between the serosa and the decidua and was measured at the anterior, fundal, and lower uterine segment (LUS) walls. The estimated fetal weight, maximum vertical pocket of amniotic fluid and placental thickness were also assessed ultrasonographically at the same time as the MT and served as estimates for the contribution of each to the uterine volume. In twins, cervical length measurements were performed transvaginally, as clinically indicated. Data analysis included 2-way analysis of variance and linear, nonlinear, and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 41.3% of twin pregnancies (38 of 92) delivered preterm (< 35 weeks). There were no significant changes in measurements at the anterior and fundal site over time throughout pregnancy and no differences in these sites between twin and singleton gestations. Conversely, in both twins and singletons, there was a significant and gradual thinning of the LUS myometrium during gestation. In the absence of uterine contractions or symptoms of preterm labor, twins hat delivered preterm had a significantly thinner LUS at an earlier gestation, compared with twins that delivered at term (P<.001), suggesting that LUS thinning occurred earlier in these cases. There was a significant correlation between cervical length and LUS thinning during gestation in twins that delivered 35 weeks GA or later (r = 0.352 P < 001) but not in those that delivered preterm (< 35 weeks GA; r = 0.125 P =.326). CONCLUSION: Twin pregnancy is characterized by a significant, selective, and gradual thinning of the LUS during gestation, which does not occur in the anterior and fundal myometrium. Thinning of the LUS occurs earlier in twin pregnancies destined to deliver preterm. These observations suggest that similar to the cervix, the LUS changes dynamically during twin pregnancy and that this too may be assessed through ultrasound imaging

Added prognostic value of Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes: A pooled analysis of three cohort studies

Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is an obstetric complication associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Doppler ultrasound can improve perinatal outcomes through monitoring at-risk fetuses and helping time delivery. Aim: To investigate the prognostic value of different Doppler ultrasound measurements for adverse perinatal outcomes. Materials: Individual participant data. Methods: We performed a pooled analysis on individual participant data. We compared six prognostic models using multilevel logistic regression, where each subsequent model added a new variable to a base model that included maternal characteristics. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and four Doppler ultrasound measurements were added in turn: umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and mean uterine artery pulsatility index (mUtA PI). The primary outcome was a composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal mortality, emergency caesarean delivery for fetal distress, or neonatal admission. Discriminative ability was quantified with area under the curve (AUC). Results: Three data sets (N = 3284) were included. Overall, the model that included EFW and UA PI improved AUC from 0.650 (95% CI 0.624–0.676) to 0.673 (95% CI 0.646–0.700). Adding more ultrasound measurements did not improve further the discriminative ability. In subgroup analysis, the addition of EFW and UA PI improved AUC in both preterm (AUC from 0.711 to 0.795) and small for gestational age pregnancies (AUC from 0.729 to 0.770), but they did not improve the models in term delivery or normal growth subgroups. Conclusions: Umbilical artery pulsatility index added prognostic value for adverse perinatal outcomes to the already available information, but the combination of other Doppler ultrasound measurements (MCA PI, CPR or UtA PI) did not improve further prognostic performance

Antenatal Fetal Adrenal Measurements at 22 to 30 Weeks' Gestation, Fetal Growth Restriction, and Perinatal Morbidity

ObjectiveOur objective was to test the association of fetal adrenal size with perinatal morbidity among fetuses with fetal growth restriction (FGR; estimated fetal weight [EFW] &lt; 10th percentile).Study designThis was a secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) adrenal study, which measured fetal adrenal gland size at 22 to 30 weeks' gestation. We analyzed the transverse adrenal area (TAA) and fetal zone area (absolute measurements and corrected for fetal size) and the ratio of the fetal zone area to the total transverse area using a composite perinatal outcome of stillbirth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, sepsis, mechanical ventilation, seizure, or death. Among fetuses with FGR, adrenal measurements were compared between those that did and did not experience the composite perinatal outcome.ResultsThere were 1,709 eligible neonates. Seven percent (n = 120) were diagnosed with FGR at the time of adrenal measurement, and 14.7% (n = 251) experienced perinatal morbidity. EFW-corrected and absolute adrenal measurements were similar among fetuses with and without FGR as well as among those who did and did not experience morbidity. The area under the curve for corrected TAA was 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.67).ConclusionIn our cohort, adrenal size was not associated with risk of morbidity among fetuses with FGR