17 research outputs found
Rainfall Field Reconstruction by Opportunistic Use of the Rain-Induced Attenuation on Microwave Satellite Signals: The July 2021 Extreme Rain Event in Germany as a Case Study
This paper presents a practical application of an
opportunistic technique for the estimation of rainfall intensity
and accumulated precipitation. The proposed technique is based
upon signal strength measurements made by commercial-grade
interactive satellite terminals. By applying some processing, the
rain-induced attenuation on the microwave downlink from the
satellite is first evaluated; then the rain attenuation is eventually
mapped into a rainfall rate estimate via a tropospheric model.
This methodology has been applied to a test area of 30×30 km2
around the city of Dortmund (North Rhine-Westphalia, upper
basin of Ermscher river), for the heavy rain event that devastated
western Germany in July, 2021. A rainfall map on this area is
obtained from the measurements collected by a set of satellite
terminals deployed in the region, and successfully compared with
a map obtained with a conventional weather radar
Clinical performance of lung ultrasound in predicting ARDS morphology
Abstract
Background
To assess diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in identifying ARDS morphology (focal vs non-focal), compared with the gold standard computed tomography.
Methods
Mechanically ventilated ARDS patients undergoing lung computed tomography and ultrasound were enrolled. Twelve fields, were evaluated. LUS score was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (consolidation) according to B-lines extent. Total and regional LUS score as the sum of the four ventral (LUSV), intermediate (LUSI) or dorsal (LUSD) fields, were calculated. Based on lung CT, ARDS morphology was defined as (1) focal (loss of aeration with lobar distribution); (2) non-focal (widespread loss of aeration or segmental loss of aeration distribution associated with uneven lung attenuation areas), and diagnostic accuracy of LUS in discriminating ARDS morphology was determined by AU-ROC in training and validation set of patients.
Results
Forty-seven patients with ARDS (25 training set and 22 validation set) were enrolled. LUSTOT, LUSV and LUSI but not LUSD score were significantly lower in focal than in non-focal ARDS morphologies (p < .01). The AU-ROC curve of LUSTOT, LUSV, LUSI and LUSD for identification of non-focal ARDS morphology were 0.890, 0.958, 0.884 and 0.421, respectively. LUSV value ≥ 3 had the best predictive value (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 1.00) in identifying non-focal ARDS morphology. In the validation set, an LUSV score ≥ 3 confirmed to be highly predictive of non-focal ARDS morphology, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 94% and 100%.
Conclusions
LUS had a valuable performance in distinguishing ARDS morphology
Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome
RATIONALE:
Tidal volume and plateau pressure limitation decreases mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Computed tomography demonstrated a small, normally aerated compartment on the top of poorly aerated and nonaerated compartments that may be hyperinflated by tidal inflation.
OBJECTIVES:
We hypothesized that despite tidal volume and plateau pressure limitation, patients with a larger nonaerated compartment are exposed to tidal hyperinflation of the normally aerated compartment.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Pulmonary computed tomography at end-expiration and end-inspiration was obtained in 30 patients ventilated with a low tidal volume (6 ml/kg predicted body weight). Cluster analysis identified 20 patients in whom tidal inflation occurred largely in the normally aerated compartment (69.9 +/- 6.9%; "more protected"), and 10 patients in whom tidal inflation occurred largely within the hyperinflated compartments (63.0 +/- 12.7%; "less protected"). The nonaerated compartment was smaller and the normally aerated compartment was larger in the more protected patients than in the less protected patients (p = 0.01). Pulmonary cytokines were lower in the more protected patients than in the less protected patients (p < 0.05). Ventilator-free days were 7 +/- 8 and 1 +/- 2 d in the more protected and less protected patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Plateau pressure ranged between 25 and 26 cm H2O in the more protected patients and between 28 and 30 cm H(2)O in the less protected patients (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS:
Limiting tidal volume to 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and plateau pressure to 30 cm H2O may not be sufficient in patients characterized by a larger nonaerated compartment