5 research outputs found

    Limits of phytosanitation and host plant resistance towards the control of cassava viruses in Uganda

    Get PDF
    Published online: 30 Sept 2017Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and the viruses that infect it, notably cassava mosaic virus and cassava brown streak viruses, have a unique history of co-evolution and co-existence. While cassava originated in South America, both viruses and the diseases they cause have largely been limited to the East African region, where they have, and continue to be key yield-robbing stresses. For sustainable control, we assume that deployment of resistant varieties when carefully combined with phytosanitation will combat these viruses. We have thus generated empirical data and tested the limits, i.e., how long this strategy can last. This entailed the comparison of elite cassava varieties, one set of virus-indexed tissue culture plantlets, and the other set, re-cycled planting materials under farmer’s cyclic propagation for 6-23 years. Trials were established at diverse sites in Uganda. We observed that both officially-released and unofficially-released cassava varieties are common in farmer’s fields; these varieties have varying susceptibility levels to viruses. Worrisome was that some officially-released varieties like NASE 3 registered cassava mosaic disease (CMD) incidences of up to 71% (virus-indexed), which was not any different from its re-cycled counterparts. Other varieties like NASE 14 have maintained high levels of CMD resistance six years after official release. Predominant re-cycled cassava varieties notably TME 204, I92/0057, TME 14, and to a limited extent NASE 14, are key reservoirs for cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) associated viruses. These findings highlight the limits of phytosanitation, i.e., in areas like Kaberamaido associated with high CMD pressure, varieties NASE 1 and NASE 3 can not be recommended; on the contrary, these varieties can be deployed in Kalangala, where they can survive with phytosanitation. And for CBSD, the findings justify the urgent need for phytosanitation (community-led) and development of varieties with higher levels of resistance and/or tolerance, as no immune variety has so far been identified

    Improvement of local cassava germ plasm in Uganda

    Get PDF
    No Abstrac

    Variation in qualitative and quantitative traits of cassava germplasm from selected national breeding programmes in subSaharan Africa

    No full text
    An improved understanding of phenotypic variation within cassava germplasm in southern, eastern and central Africa will help to formulate knowledge-based breeding strategies. Thus, the overall objective of this study was to examine the phenotypic variation in cassava germplasm available within six breeding programmes in Africa, namely Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Madagascar. In each country, single-row plots were used for assessment of 29 qualitative traits and evaluation of four quantitative traits: root dry matter content (DMC), harvest index (HI), leaf retention (LR) and root cortex thickness. Qualitative traits provided limited discrimination of cassava germplasm. However, differences in DMC, HI, LR and root cortex thickness were observed among the germplasm indicating scope for genetic improvement. Highest average DMC was registered in Uganda (39.3%) and lowest in Tanzania (30.1%), with the elite genotypes having a relatively higher DMC than local genotypes. Highest average HI was observed in Uganda (0.60) and lowest in Kenya (0.32). Cassava genotypes displayed varied root peel thickness (0.34–4.89 mm). This study highlights variation in agronomic traits that could be exploited to increase cassava productivity

    A breeding scheme for local adoption of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

    No full text
    In many rural communities, cassava mosaic disease (CMD) resistant varieties are being rejected by farmers owing to their inferior root qualities when compared to locally adapted varieties. In response to this challenge, we implemented a breeding scheme whose objective was to combine CMD resistance with farmer preferred root qualities, whose genes were respectively sourced for elite and local varieties. We targeted to achieve this goal within five years that comprised of: i) hybridization of complementary parental lines, ii) seedling evaluation trial (SET); iii) clonal evaluation trial (CET); iv) modified preliminary yield trial (MPYT) and v) modified uniform yield trial (MUYT). At SET and CET, emphasis was placed on traits of moderate to high heritability while for MPYT and MUYT emphasis was on traits of low heritability. Generated F 1 progeny (4080 half sibs) were established in SET of which 1014 seedlings were selected and advanced to the CET. At CET, only 143 clones were selected and advanced. Under MPYT, slightly less than 50% of the clones were selected, while under MUYT, (8 to 40 clones per site) were selected. Clones selected per site were characterized by: DMC (28 to 38%); ii) HI (0.26 to 0.62); iii) yield (14 to 59 t/ha), resistance to CMD and desirable farmer root qualities. Given this outcome, we have demonstrated the utility of this scheme in accelerating development of locally adapted cassava varieties and thus propose the scheme be referred to as "speed cassava breeding"
    corecore