Social Construction and White Attitudes toward Equal Opportunity and Multiculturalism

As the United States moves from being a predominantly biracial to a multiracial society, racial attitudes continue to become more diverse and more complex. Scholars need to address these changes not only in terms of black and white Americans, but also how these changes involve and affect other racial groups, particularly Asian and Hispanic Americans. This inquiry looks at some of these complexities by examining how social construction differentials in the minds of white Americans affect their attitudes toward the issues of equal opportunity and multiculturalism. The analysis shows that differences in the cognitive images whites hold of minority groups in comparison to their own race have a significant impact in determining white attitudes toward group-based issues. In effect, negative constructions of racial groups lower one\u27s support for policies aimed at these groups

The Answering Machine Generation - Who Are They and What Problem Do They Pose for Survey Research

Increased incidence of telephone answering machines and the use of such devices to screen calls pose a potential threat to the representativeness of samples in telephone surveys. Using data from nine statewide surveys, this analysis examines the extent to which answering machines are used to screen calls and the demographic characteristics associated with answering machine use and call screening. Results show that at most two to three percent of households use answering machines to screen calls, and that such screening is more likely to take place in households with higher family incomes, outside rural areas, and which include individuals who are younger and have higher levels of education. While call screening does not presently threaten the representativeness of samples in telephone surveys, the increased incidence of answering machines together with the increased percentage of households indicating these devices are sometimes used to screen calls demonstrate that the potential bias from this source is growing

Can Partisanship Trump Racism? White Voter Support for Black Republican Candidates

In exploring the role that racism plays in voters’ evaluation of candidates, recent research has provided evidence that white voters do not discriminate against conservative minority candidates in high-profile general elections. In situations in which a candidate’s race and his or her party identification would seemingly lead voters in opposite directions, partisanship takes precedence over race in influencing the vote decision. The 2014 U.S. Senate election in South Carolina, in which both seats—one held by a white Republican, the other by a black Republican—were contested presented a unique opportunity to test this premise. In a hypothetical trial heat between similar white and black candidates, white voters did not appear to discriminate against a black Republican candidate. Moreover, white voters who scored high on a symbolic racism measure were no less likely to express support for a conservative black candidate than those with more tolerant racial attitudes

Public Opinion on School-Based Sex Education in South Carolina

The purpose of this article was to determine opinions on the use of abstinence only versus comprehensive sex education by registered voters in South Carolina. A cross-sectional, random-digit dial sample was utilized. Approximately 81% of respondents indicated support for sex education that emphasizes abstinence but also teaches about the benefits and importance of using contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and/or sexually transmitted diseases. Results suggest that registered voters in South Carolina support teaching a comprehensive approach to sex education and favor a variety of sex education topics, regardless of political ideology, religion, or parental status