5 research outputs found

    Biosecurity and Vector Behaviour: Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Anglers and Canoeists as Pathways for the Spread of Invasive Non-Native Species and Pathogens

    Get PDF
    Invasive non-native species (INNS) endanger native biodiversity and are a major economic problem. The management of pathways to prevent their introduction and establishment is a key target in the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi biodiversity targets for 2020. Freshwater environments are particularly susceptible to invasions as they are exposed to multiple introduction pathways, including non-native fish stocking and the release of boat ballast water. Since many freshwater INNS and aquatic pathogens can survive for several days in damp environments, there is potential for transport between water catchments on the equipment used by recreational anglers and canoeists. To quantify this biosecurity risk, we conducted an online questionnaire with 960 anglers and 599 canoeists to investigate their locations of activity, equipment used, and how frequently equipment was cleaned and/or dried after use. Anglers were also asked about their use and disposal of live bait. Our results indicate that 64% of anglers and 78.5% of canoeists use their equipment/boat in more than one catchment within a fortnight, the survival time of many of the INNS and pathogens considered in this study and that 12% of anglers and 50% of canoeists do so without either cleaning or drying their kit between uses. Furthermore, 8% of anglers and 28% of canoeists had used their equipment overseas without cleaning or drying it after each use which could facilitate both the introduction and secondary spread of INNS in the UK. Our results provide a baseline against which to evaluate the effectiveness of future biosecurity awareness campaigns, and identify groups to target with biosecurity awareness information. Our results also indicate that the biosecurity practices of these groups must improve to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently spreading INNS and pathogens through these activities

    Main parasitic infections in gilthead seabream and European seabass aquaculture: risk factors from stakeholders' perspective

    No full text
    Understanding of risk factors for parasite introduction and amplification within fish farms is crucial to design effective biosecurity and control management strategies but currently, quantitative data on the relevance of such risk factors is largely absent. We have designed the questionnaires for stakeholders to characterize the risk factors and estimate their relevance for infections causing major economic burden on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) production: the myxozoan Enteromyxum leei, the monogenean Sparicotyle chrysophrii, the crustacean Ceratothoa oestroides and the dinoflagellate Amyloodinium ocellatum. Twenty-two experts (Belgium, Croatia, Greece, Italy, Norway, and Spain) were invited to participate in an online questionnaire, followed by a physical meeting to discuss the most probable values for parameter estimates. Quantitative estimates were obtained for the relevance of risk routes of parasite spread (e.g., the likelihood of parasite transmission from an infected to an uninfected net cage 5 m away was estimated to be 90% for E. leei), and the relevance of management procedures and environmental factors that may have an impact on the probability of infection to lead to disease (e.g., where mortalities are removed at > 5-day intervals, the likelihood that infection will lead to disease was 30% for S. chrysophrii). These quantitative estimates were appraised, including the delay in reaching harvest size, or cumulative mortality during phases of production, being essential for calculation of the burden of these diseases in aquaculture. The data presented are highly valuable to the development of economically viable biosecurity and specific integrated pest management strategies
    corecore