13 research outputs found
Synthesis of 86 species of 1,5-diaryl-3-oxo-1,4-pentadienes analogs of curcumin can yield a good lead in vivo
Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS‑102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T‑CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers
Purpose The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study included elderly patients aged 65 years or more who had fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal cancer and received trifluridine/tipiracil (70 mg/m2, days 1–5 and 8–12, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), toxicities, association between efficacy and geriatric assessment scores, and association between toxicity and plasma drug concentrations. Results A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 73 years were enrolled. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.9–4.3 months), while median OS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7–8.9 months). Patients had an ORR of 0%, with 57% having stable disease. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 13% of the patients. Patients with a higher G8 score (15 or more) showed longer PFS than those with a lower G8 score (median 4.6 vs. 2.0 months; p = 0.047). Moreover, patients with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia showed higher maximum trifluridine concentrations than those with grade 1 or 2 neutropenia (mean 2945 vs. 2107 ng/mL; p = 0.036). Discussion The current phase II trial demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil was an effective and well-tolerated option for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Moreover, geriatric assessment tools and/or plasma drug concentration monitoring might be helpful in predicting the efficacy and toxicities in elderly patients receiving this drug. Trial registration number UMIN000017589, 15/May/2015 (The University Hospital Medical Information Network
Multiple cavitary lung lesions from colorectal cancer responding to chemotherapy
Lung metastasis is an uncommon cause of multiple cavitary lung lesions. Herein, we report a case of multiple cavitary lung lesions of colorectal cancer that responded to chemotherapy. An 81-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed multiple cavitary lung lesions. The patient was diagnosed with lung metastases from colorectal cancer with a lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Following chemotherapy, the cavitary lung lesions shrank. Lung metastases from colorectal cancer may appear as multiple cavitary lung lesions, which may be misdiagnosed as infections. Clinicians should consider lung metastases when multiple cavitary lung lesions are detected
Possible predictive value of G8 score and the drug concentrations for efficacy and toxicity of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A multicenter, phase II study (T-CORE1401).
Syntheses of naturally occurring cytotoxic [7.7]paracyclophanes, (−)-cylindrocyclophane A and its enantiomer, and implications for biological activity
Clinicopathological characteristics of 42 patients with advanced bone or soft tissue sarcoma.
<p>Clinicopathological characteristics of 42 patients with advanced bone or soft tissue sarcoma.</p
Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS‑102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T‑CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers
PURPOSE: The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study included elderly patients aged 65 years or more who had fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal cancer and received trifluridine/tipiracil (70 mg/m(2), days 1–5 and 8–12, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), toxicities, association between efficacy and geriatric assessment scores, and association between toxicity and plasma drug concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 73 years were enrolled. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.9–4.3 months), while median OS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7–8.9 months). Patients had an ORR of 0%, with 57% having stable disease. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 13% of the patients. Patients with a higher G8 score (15 or more) showed longer PFS than those with a lower G8 score (median 4.6 vs. 2.0 months; p = 0.047). Moreover, patients with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia showed higher maximum trifluridine concentrations than those with grade 1 or 2 neutropenia (mean 2945 vs. 2107 ng/mL; p = 0.036). DISCUSSION: The current phase II trial demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil was an effective and well-tolerated option for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Moreover, geriatric assessment tools and/or plasma drug concentration monitoring might be helpful in predicting the efficacy and toxicities in elderly patients receiving this drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000017589, 15/May/2015 (The University Hospital Medical Information Network) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04277-3
Progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients enrolled in this study.
<p>Progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients (A), and PFS between patients with bone sarcoma and patients with soft tissue sarcoma (B). Overall survival (OS) of all patients (C), and OS between patients with bone sarcoma and those with soft tissue sarcoma (D).</p
Waterfall plot of maximum percentage reduction in sizes of measurable lesions.
<p>Blue, green, yellow, and red columns represent progressive disease, stable disease, partial response, and complete response, respectively.</p