Validation of the Dutch Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ)

Background: Measurement instruments should be validated for use in the population for which they are intended. The Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) has been developed to measure impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with hand eczema. Objectives: To assess validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability of the Dutch version of the QOLHEQ. Methods: This was a prospective validation study in adult patients with hand eczema. At three time points (T0, baseline; T1, after 1–3 days; T2, after 4–12 weeks), data from the QOLHEQ and multiple reference instruments were collected. Scale structure was assessed using item response theory analysis and structural equation modelling (SEM). Single-score validity and responsiveness were tested with hypotheses on correlations with reference instruments. Concerning reproducibility, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCagreement) and standard error of agreement (SEMagreement) were checked. Regarding interpretability, bands for severity of quality-of-life impairment were proposed. Also, smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimally important change (MIC) were determined. Results: At T0, 300 individuals participated in the study (54% were male, mean age 45 years). Rescoring of the scale structure fitted the Rasch model and the SEM. The ICCagreement was 0·91 (95% confidence interval 0·85–0·94) and the SEMagreement was 5·2 points. Of the a priori formulated hypotheses, 80% (single-score validity) and 64% (change scores for responsiveness) were confirmed. The SDC was 14·4 points and the MIC was 11·5 points. Conclusions: The Dutch version of the QOLHEQ has a good structural validity and reproducibility and has a high single-score validity and moderate responsiveness. An improvement of ≥ 15 points should be regarded as a real, important change within the Dutch population. What's already known about this topic?. The Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) measures impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hand eczema. The QOLHEQ was validated in Germany and Japan, but the validity and interpretability of the Dutch version are unknown. What does this study add?. This study shows that the Dutch QOLHEQ is a valid instrument to measure HRQoL impairment in Dutch patients with hand eczema, demonstrating good reliability and moderate responsiveness. Methods of item response theory are applied to assess and refine the scoring structure. Severity gradings to interpret single and change scores, specifically in Dutch patients, are proposed. What are the clinical implications of this work?. The Dutch QOLHEQ can now be used to measure HRQoL impairment in Dutch patients with hand eczema

Protocol for the development of a core domain set for hand eczema trials

Background Clinical hand eczema trials measure a variety of outcome domains to determine the success of interventions. This considerably limits the comparability and overall confidence in the study results, and thereby the strength of recommendations for clinical practice. Objectives The Hand Eczema Core Outcome Set (HECOS) initiative aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) for the standardized evaluation of interventions in future hand eczema trials and reviews. This COS will define the minimum that should be measured and reported in controlled and randomized-controlled trials of therapeutic hand eczema interventions. The objective of this protocol is to specify the methods to develop a core domain set. Methods In Phase 1, a list of candidate domains will be derived from a systematic literature review concerning previously measured outcomes in hand eczema trials, from qualitative patient interviews and from expert interviews. In Phase 2, a consensus study about core domains will be conducted by an online 3-round Delphi survey and a face-to-face meeting, applying predefined consensus criteria. HECOS involves hand eczema and methods experts as well as patients and further stakeholders with an interest in the initiative. Outlook When a set of core domains has been defined, HECOS is going to identify appropriate outcome measurement instruments in a development process that will be detailed in another protocol. The COS will considerably enhance the methodological quality, comparability and usefulness of hand eczema trials for clinical decision-making and the development of new therapeutic options for hand eczema, and also reduce the effort of planning, conducting, and reporting individual hand eczema studies, reviews and meta-analyses

Validation of questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix II:the EDEN Fragrance Study

Background: In a European study on contact allergy in the general population, it has been hypothesized that the combination of contact allergy to a fragrance together with a history indicating dermatitis at exposure and thereafter subsequent avoidance of scented products implied a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to validate this hypothesis/algorithm. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there was any association between the outcome of the recent repeated open application test (ROAT) and the patch test reactivity. Methods: One hundred nine subjects with and without contact allergy to fragrance mix II (FM II) were recruited. Volunteers from six European dermatology clinics participated in the study including a patch test and a ROAT. Results: Twenty-four positive ROAT reactions were noted in total including 20 of those 32 with contact allergy to FM II. None of the volunteers reacted to the vehicle (P < 0.001). More individuals with a positive algorithm had positive ROATs when compared with those with a negative algorithm. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). The lower the patch test concentration eliciting a positive test reaction, the more likely was a positive ROAT and the more likely that the positive ROAT appeared early during the investigative period. Conclusions: The algorithm used in this study was not validated but it was indicated in this ROAT setup. The stronger the patch test reactivity the more likely was a positive ROAT and the more likely it was that the positive ROAT appeared early during the application period

Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I

Background In a European study on contact allergy in the general population, it was hypothesized that the combination of contact allergy to a fragrance together with a history indicating dermatitis at exposure, and thereafter subsequent avoidance of scented products, implied a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Objectives The primary aim of this study was to validate this hypothesis and algorithm. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there was any association between the outcome of the repeated open application test (ROAT) and the patch test reactivity. Methods In total, 109 patients with and without contact allergy to fragrance mix (FM) I were recruited. Volunteers from six European dermatology clinics participated in the study including a patch test and a ROAT. Results Positive ROAT reactions were noted in 26 of the 44 volunteers with contact allergy to FM I. None of the volunteers reacted to the vehicle (P <0 center dot 001). More individuals with a positive algorithm had positive ROATs than those with a negative algorithm. However, the difference was not statistically significant. The lower the patch test concentration eliciting a positive test reaction, the more likely a positive ROAT and the more likely that the positive ROAT appeared early during the investigative period. Conclusions The algorithm used in this study was not substantiated in this ROAT set-up. The stronger the patch test reactivity the more likely was a positive ROAT and the more likely it was that the positive ROAT appeared early during the application period. What's already known about this topic? To the best of our knowledge, a scientifically designed and conducted repeated open application test (ROAT) has never been performed before to validate a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis partly based on a questionnaire. What does this study add? This is the largest controlled, randomized and blinded ROAT performed to date. Higher patch test reactivity to fragrance mix I indicated a greater likelihood of a positive ROAT

Chronic hand eczema in Europe:Patient experiences and perspectives (CHEPEP) in qualitative interviews

Background: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a very common skin disease among the European population. It causes itch and pain and, in more severe cases, seriously impairs hand functioning at work and in private life. Objectives: To explore perspectives of people with lived experience on CHE-related problems, wishes and goals. Methods: Following a qualitative approach, we conducted topic-guided interviews in five European countries and applied template analysis to identify recurrent themes among patients with CHE. Results: We interviewed 60 patients in seven outpatient dermatological and occupational medicine clinics in Croatia, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain. Five main themes were identified: (1) knowledge about the disease and its course, (2) preventive behaviour, (3) hand eczema therapy, (4) impact on everyday life and (5) attitudes towards CHE and healthcare. Participants did not feel well informed about CHE, especially about causes, triggers and treatment options. Preventive measures were experienced as more or less effective but also cumbersome. Experiences with therapy were diverse. Treatment satisfaction depended on the results and on the perceived support from the treatment teams. Participants found it important to be taken seriously, to receive practical advice, to try out additional treatments or examinations, find new hope and have occupational perspectives. They wished that others could better understand the physical and emotional burden of CHE. Patient support groups were not mentioned. Participants found it important to learn to take care of themselves and accept life with CHE. Conclusions: Due to its annoying symptoms, high visibility and impaired functioning at work and in private life, CHE has a high emotional and social impact. Some people may require support to learn coping with CHE and its prevention. Patients wish for information about causes and triggers. They value physicians who listen to them and keep looking for solutions.</p

Report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology on the development of advanced reactors, Part A: Motion for a resolution. Working Documents 1984-85, Document 1-224/84/A, 8 May 1984

Background Population/based studies about contact allergy are scarce. Objectives To obtain reliable estimates of the prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Europe. Methods A cross-sectional study of a random sample from the general population, aged 18-74 years, in five different European countries (Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Portugal). In total, 12 377 subjects were interviewed and a random sample (n = 3119) patch tested to TRUE Test panels 1-3 and Fragrance Mix (FM) II, hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) and sesquiterpene lactone mix. A positive patch test reaction is considered as contact allergy. Results In total, 27.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.5-28.5] had at least one positive reaction to an allergen of the European baseline series, with a significantly higher prevalence in women than in men. The highest age-standardized prevalences (>= 1%) were found for nickel (14.5%, 95% CI 13.2-15.8), thiomersal (5.0%, 95% CI 4.2-5.8), cobalt (2.2%, 95% CI 1.7-2.7), FM II (1.9%, 95% CI 1.5-2.5), FM I (1.8%, 95% CI 1.4-2.3), HICC (1.4%, 95% CI 1.0-1.9), p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (1.3%, 95% CI 0.9-1.7) and para-phenylenediamine (1.0%, 95% CI 0.6-1.3). Only nickel and thiomersal showed a statistically significantly different prevalence for contact allergy among the different European populations. Subjects reporting contact dermatitis in their lifetime (age-standardized prevalence 15.1%, 95% CI 13.8-16.3) had an increased risk for contact allergy (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5). The risk of having a contact allergy was not increased in those with atopic dermatitis (prevalence 7.6%, 95% CI 6.7-8.6; odds ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.4). Conclusions Contact allergy to at least one allergen of the European baseline series was diagnosed in more than one-quarter of the general European population. Therefore measures to improve the primary prevention of contact allergy have to be enforced

The impact of skin conditions on generic health-related quality of life

Linked Article: Balieva etal. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:1170-1178

Protocol for the development of a core domain set for hand eczema trials

Background Clinical hand eczema trials measure a variety of outcome domains to determine the success of interventions. This considerably limits the comparability and overall confidence in the study results, and thereby the strength of recommendations for clinical practice. Objectives The Hand Eczema Core Outcome Set (HECOS) initiative aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) for the standardized evaluation of interventions in future hand eczema trials and reviews. This COS will define the minimum that should be measured and reported in controlled and randomized-controlled trials of therapeutic hand eczema interventions. The objective of this protocol is to specify the methods to develop a core domain set. Methods In Phase 1, a list of candidate domains will be derived from a systematic literature review concerning previously measured outcomes in hand eczema trials, from qualitative patient interviews and from expert interviews. In Phase 2, a consensus study about core domains will be conducted by an online 3-round Delphi survey and a face-to-face meeting, applying predefined consensus criteria. HECOS involves hand eczema and methods experts as well as patients and further stakeholders with an interest in the initiative. Outlook When a set of core domains has been defined, HECOS is going to identify appropriate outcome measurement instruments in a development process that will be detailed in another protocol. The COS will considerably enhance the methodological quality, comparability and usefulness of hand eczema trials for clinical decision-making and the development of new therapeutic options for hand eczema, and also reduce the effort of planning, conducting, and reporting individual hand eczema studies, reviews and meta-analyses

Colophony as marker for fragrance allergy in the general European population.

Colophony is not used as a fragrance ingredient. However, colophony is a well-established marker of fragrance contact allergy(2-4) . Colophony was therefore included as a fragrance allergy marker in our recent paper in BJD on contact allergy in the general population (prevalence 1.0%; 95%-CI 0.6%-1.3%)(5) . When including colophony as a fragrance marker in the article on fragrance contact allergy(1) together with fragrance mix I (FM I) in the True test containing an evernia prunastri (oak moss) with a high content of atranol and chloratranol or fragrance mix II (FM II) or any of the individual materials in either FM I or FM II or Myroxylon pereirae (MP) or sesquiterpene lactones, some information in table 5 of this article(1) change slightly according to the numbers given here: This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved