9 research outputs found

    Falls and outcomes amongst old people in rural dwellings

    Get PDF
    Background: Falls are the leading cause of injury deaths among people 65 years and older. This study gives an insight into the prevalence of falls among older people and how they occur in a rural setting in Nigeria.Methods: A community based survey of 210 consenting old people aged 65 years and above selected using a multi-stage sampling technique was done. Study instrument was a semi-structured interviewer administered questionnaire and visual acuity was tested using Snellens chart.Results: Incidence of falls was 21.4%. Of those who had falls, 86.7% were walking while 11.1% were either sitting or running when it occurred. The nature of the fall was tripping in 44.4%, slipping in 35.6% and hitting an object in 17.8% of cases. Consequences of falls included pain 48.9%, bruises 22.2%, lacerations 13.3% and fractures 11.1%. Females had more falls than males; 23.8% vs 19.0%, p = 0.40. Major injuries resulting fromfalls also occurred more frequently amongst females than males; 30.7% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.3. History of diabetes and alcohol use increased the odds of falling (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0 – 16.0; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0 – 4.6 respectively). Being in a monogamous marriage and having normal sight were protective of having falls (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 – 0.9; OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 – 0.9 respectively). Conclusion: Falls often occur from tripping and slipping while females are more likely to have major injuries. Risk factors for falls were alcohol use and diabetes while having normal sight andbeing monogamous were protective. Prevention should aim at a life course approach to addressing these intrinsic and extrinsic factors

    Comparison of Three Troponins as Predictors of Future Cardiovascular Events - Prospective Results from the FINRISK and BiomaCaRE Studies

    Get PDF
    IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE: Besides their role in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI), troponins may be powerful biomarkers for risk stratification in the general population. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of three troponin assays in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction in a population-based cohort without a history of CVD events. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Troponin I concentrations were measured using a contemporary-sensitivity, high-sensitivity, and super-sensitivity assay in 7,899 participants of the general-population based FINRISK 1997 cohort. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine relative risks, followed by measures of discrimination and reclassification using 10-fold cross-validation to control for over-optimism. MAIN OUTCOME: As outcome measures we used CVD, MI, ischemic stroke, heart failure (HF), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). During the follow-up of 14 years 1,074 incident MACE were observed. RESULTS: Values above the lower limit of detection were observed in 26.4%, 81.5% and 93.9% for the contemporary-sensitivity, high-sensitivity and super-sensitivity assay, respectively. We observed significant associations of troponin concentrations with the risk of future CVD events and the results tended to become stronger with increasing assay sensitivity. For the super-sensitivity assay the multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (per one standard deviation increase) for different outcomes were: MI 1.24 [95% CI 1.11-1.39], stroke 1.14 [1.01-1.28], CVD 1.15 [1.07-1.24], HF 1.28 [1.18-1.39], and MACE 1.18 [1.11-1.25]. In subjects with intermediate risk, we found an improvement of net reclassification for HF (10.2%, p<0.001), and MACE (5.1%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using a super-sensitivity assay, cardiac troponin was detectable in almost all healthy individuals. Its concentration improved risk prediction and reclassification for cardiovascular endpoints
    corecore