139 research outputs found
MOLECULAR AND GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SURFACE AND NONSTRUCTURE PROTEINS OF PANDEMIC INFLUENZA VIRUSES A(H1N1)PDM09 IN 2015-2016 EPIDEMIC SEASON
The aim of the present study was identifying of molecular and genetic changes in hemaglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA) and non-structure protein (NS1) genes of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 strains, that circulated in Ukraine during 2015-2016 epidemic season. Samples (nasopharyngeal swabs from patients) were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7 software. 3D structures were constructed in Chimera 1.11.2rc software.Viruses were collected in 2015-2016 season fell into genetic group 6B and in two emerging subgroups, 6B.1 and 6B.2 by gene of HA and NA. Subgroups 6B.1 and 6B.2 are defined by the following amino acid substitutions. In the NS1 protein were identified new amino acid substitutions D2E, N48S, and E125D in 2015-2016 epidemic season. Specific changes were observed in HA protein antigenic sites, but viruses saved similarity to vaccine strain. NS1 protein acquired substitution associated with increased virulence of the influenza virus
Resistance of old winter bread wheat landraces to tan spot
Background. The most effective and environmentally safe way to combat wheat diseases is to produce cultivars resistant to their pathogens. For this purpose, old landraces are often used as genetically diverse sources of traits important for breeding. In the process of wheat breeding for resistance to tan spot caused by the fungus Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs. (abbr. Ptr), selection is carried out against the dominant allele of Tsn1, the gene of sensitivity to the toxin Ptr ToxA, which induces necrosis and represents the main pathogenicity factor of Ptr controlled by the ToxA gene. The aim of the study was to characterize a set of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accessions from the VIR collection for resistance to various Ptr populations, genotype these accessions using Xfcp623 β a DNA marker of the Tsn1 gene, and identify sources of tan spot resistance.Materials and methods. Sixty-seven accessions of winter bread wheat landraces were studied. Seedling resistance to two Ptr populations was assessed using a 5-point scale adopted at VIZR. The allelic state of Tsn1 was identified by PCR.Results. Dominant alleles of Tsn1 were found for 55% of the studied accessions. Seventeen accessions were resistant or moderately resistant to two Ptr populations and an isolate from Krasnodar Territory previously used for their characterization. Nine of them had the tsn1tsn1 genotype, and 8 had Tsn1Tsn1. The accessions mainly belonged to three agroecological groups proposed by N. I. Vavilov: βsteppe winter bread wheat (Banatka wheats)β, βNorth European forest awnless bread wheats (Sandomirka wheats)β, and βCaucasian mountain winter bread wheatβ.Conclusion. The identified 17 accessions resistant to Ptr are potential breeding sources of resistance. In the studied set of accessions, no significant relationship was found between the allelic state of the Tsn1 gene in the accession and its response to the infection with pathogen populations, including isolates with the ToxA gene
Bioethics In The Context Of Socio-Economic, Socio-Political And Cultural Development Of Society
ΠΡΠΎΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° β Π½Π΅ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠΊ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΡ, Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΉ ΡΠ½ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ·Π½Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΆΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΠΉΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π½Π° ΠΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Ρ. Π ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π³Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ, Π΄Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ² Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ±βΡΠΊΡΡΠ² Π½Π°Π²ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ° Ρ Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ. ΠΡΠ½ Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π±Π΅Π· ΡΠΊΠΎΡ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΊΡ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ° Π·Π°Π³Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ²ΡΡΡ, Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠ² ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ° ΡΡ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ. Π£ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Π²ΠΈΡΠ²ΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ° ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ½ Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
. ΠΠΎΡΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ. ΠΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ: Π΄ΡΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΡΠ³Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΆΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π· Π±ΡΠ΄Ρ-ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±βΡΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ, ΠΏΠΎΠ²βΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ· ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡ ΡΠ° Π·Π°Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ°Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡΠ². Π‘ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½Π° Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΡΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ Π· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π²Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ° ΡΠ½ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ in vitro. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ β Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΌΡΠΆΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡΠ² Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Ρ
, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Π²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ Π· ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ° ΠΎΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠ³Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π½ Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠ² ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ. ΠΠ° ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΡΠΆΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½Π΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ²ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ², ΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π· Π±ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±βΡΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡΠ² (Π² Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡΡ). ΠΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΊ Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²ΡΡΠ²Ρ ΡΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½, ΡΠ°ΠΊ Ρ Π² ΠΌΡΠΆΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²ΡΡΠ²Ρ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ³Π°ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡ
Π·Π°Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡ Ρ Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ·Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈ Π·Π½ΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ, Ρ ΡΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠ² Π±ΡΠΎΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ β ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π°Π³ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Π° Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° Π±ΡΠΎΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ β Π·Π±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΆΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠ° Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²βΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡ. ΠΠ±ΠΎΠ²βΡΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌ Ρ ΡΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΠΆΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ Ρ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ in vitro Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ. ΠΠ° Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ²Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΡΠΆΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π· Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΡΠ², ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ², Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Ρ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΡΡ
ΡΠ° Π·Π΄ΡΠΉΡΠ½Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΡΡΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ.The paper considers the problems of ethical and legal regulation of modern biomedical research, where one of the methods of studying and describing environmental objects is an experiment. It is a key tool of practice, without which theory is impossible. Given the pace of development of modern science and the world as a whole, the topic of studying the principles of regulation of biomedical research and their improvement is relevant. The article highlights the basic principles of the use of humans and animals in biomedical research. It was explained why it is so important to strengthen the humanization of this process. The conclusions are the following: it is very important to prevent cruelty of any biological objects in the context of resolving bioethical and legal problems associated with the implementation of the principle of humanism and the protection of the rights of living organisms. Modern science and the practice of preclinical and clinical tests should be involved into serious challenge in order to improve and universalize the process of medical and biological research technology in vitro. The purpose of the article is to study the main international legal principles of using living organisms in biomedical experiments, as well as to determine the main problems on this issue and to outline the ways to resolve them. To examine the current state of ethical and legal regulation, principles and rules for conducting experimental biomedical research. Nowadays the international community has adopted enough legal acts regulating the proper behavior with biological objects, including those specially cultivated for such studies (laboratory) when conducting biomedical experiments. Recently, both, in the national legislation of European countries and international legislation, there have been trends to strengthen their protection in the field of biomedical research. The article provides examples of bullying, and as a result of a direct violation of the basic principles of bioethics β respect for the autonomy and dignity of a person. It is proved that the main task of bioethics is to preserve the life and health of every organism. It is imperative, both at the international and national levels, to adopt programs for development and support of scientific study of the in vitro biosystems introduction into research practice. At the national level, it is necessary to criminalize the violation of international standards for conducting biomedical research using organisms. Both, international and national legislation should impose a direct ban on the use of in vivo technologies in case of the possibility of using in vitro technologies.ΠΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° β Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅. Π ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π³Π΄Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ. ΠΠ½ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π±Π΅Π· ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡ. Π£ΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ°, Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π² Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°. ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ². Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΊ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ in vitro. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ β ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π² Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Ρ
, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°Π΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ°ΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² (Π² Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ). Π ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅Π²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ β ΡΠ²Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Π°Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ β ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°. ΠΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ in vitro Π² ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ², ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ
Influence of allelic polymorphism in the 3β untranslated region of the <i>StTCP23</i> gene on the tolerance of potato cultivars to the potato spindle tuber viroid
Background. It is known that the pathological phenotype of potato plants can be mediated by complementary interactions between the genomic RNA of PSTVd and mRNA of some regulatory genes, which consequently lead to RNA interference, the synthesis of small interfering RNAs (vd-sRNA PSTVd), and impaired morphogenesis. At the same time, symptoms caused by the viroid may vary in different potato cultivars. Here we predict the interactions between the 3β UTRs of various alleles of the StTCP23 transcription factor gene and the complementary regions in PSTVd genomic RNA.Materials and methods. We selected eight commercial potato cultivars with different symptoms of viroid infection and disease. For each cultivar, six clones of each cDNA amplicon of StTCP23 with a 3β UTR were identified, and the allelic compositions of the target regions within their 3β UTRs were characterized.Results. In total, 11 types of alleles of the 3β UTR StTCP23 segment complementary to the vd-sRNA PSTVd were identified. Cultivars with the A allele (βGalaβ, βColombaβ, βFavoritβ, and βFioletovyβ) identical to the reference genome or a high dose of the C allele with a deletion of four nucleotides (cv. βImpalaβ) were characterized by high susceptibility already at the primary (firstyear) infection with the PSTVd. Cvs. βKrepyshβ, βLabadiaβ and βRivieraβ, classified as tolerant during primary inoculation, on the contrary, were characterized by the absence of the A allele and the presence of cultivar-specific mutant alleles.Conclusion. A high degree of polymorphism in the target site (3β UTR region) of StTCP23 indicates a possible selection pressure on this locus. It can be assumed that cultivars with shorter alleles, which have fewer bases complementary to vd-sRNA in hypothetical duplexes and therefore less likely to induce target gene silencing, are more tolerant to the PSTVd upon primary viroid infection
The selection pressure on the neuraminidase gene of influenza viruses isolated in Ukraine from 2009 to 2015
A broad range of naturally occurring antigenic variants of the influenza virus is caused by its rapid evolutionary variability. The survival of viable influenza virus variants occurs through natural selection. The treatment of influenza infection with modern antiviral drugs β neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors β leads to the occurrence of mutations in the NA gene, which thereby result in the emergence of virus resistance to these drugs. The goal of this study was to determine the selection pressure on the NA protein of influenza viruses isolated in Ukraine from 2009 to 2015. The main method for assessing the selection pressure on proteins is to quantify the ratio of substitution rates at nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) sites. With the help of this method, we showed that only a few codons in the NA gene were under positive selection resulting in mutations at the following sites: for influenza A viruses of the A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype β site 40, for viruses of the A(H3N2) subtype β sites 93 and 402, for Influenza B viruses of the B/Yamagata lineage β sites 74, 99, and 268, and for the viruses of the B/Victoria lineage β sites 358, 288, and 455. These sites are not associated with the NA active site, transmembrane domain, or the antigenic sites of this protein. We concluded that NA inhibitors are not a significant factor in the process of selection of the influenza viruses in Ukraine because the sites associated with the resistance of influenza viruses to NA inhibitors were not affected by positive selection. This finding could be explained by the limited use of NA inhibitors for the treatment of influenza infections in Ukraine.Β A broad range of naturally occurring antigenic variants of the influenza virus is caused by its rapid evolutionary variability. The survival of viable influenza virus variants occurs through natural selection. The treatment of influenza infection with modern antiviral drugs β neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors β leads to the occurrence of mutations in the NA gene, which thereby result in the emergence of virus resistance to these drugs. The goal of this study was to determine the selection pressure on the NA protein of influenza viruses isolated in Ukraine from 2009 to 2015. The main method for assessing the selection pressure on proteins is to quantify the ratio of substitution rates at nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) sites. With the help of this method, we showed that only a few codons in the NA gene were under positive selection resulting in mutations at the following sites: for influenza A viruses of the A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype β site 40, for viruses of the A(H3N2) subtype β sites 93 and 402, for Influenza B viruses of the B/Yamagata lineage β sites 74, 99, and 268, and for the viruses of the B/Victoria lineage β sites 358, 288, and 455. These sites are not associated with the NA active site, transmembrane domain, or the antigenic sites of this protein. We concluded that NA inhibitors are not a significant factor in the process of selection of the influenza viruses in Ukraine because the sites associated with the resistance of influenza viruses to NA inhibitors were not affected by positive selection. This finding could be explained by the limited use of NA inhibitors for the treatment of influenza infections in Ukraine.
Potato resistance to quarantine diseases
The casual agent of potato wart Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc. and potato golden nematode (PGN) Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber) Behrens are the quarantine species causing the most widespread and destructive diseases of potato in the Russian Federation and other countries of the world. The potato pale nematode Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens is not found in Russia, although in the European Union it is found everywhere. The review provides information on the harmfulness of S. endobioticum and PGN. To date, 43 pathotypes of S. endobioticum and 5 pathotypes of PGN have been revealed in the world. In the Russian Federation, only the first (D1) pathotype of potato wart and pathotype Ro1 of PGN have been found. Modern sets of differentials for S. endobioticum and PGN and methods of pathotype composition determination, including efforts to develop molecular markers (SSR) to determine the race of S. endobioticum, are presented. Data on the resistance of commercial potato cultivars to these quarantine diseases and methods for resistance determination are reviewed. Modern data on the genetics of potato resistance to S. endobioticum, G. rostochiensis and G. pallida, including mapping and cloning of R-genes, are presented. Available literature data on molecular markers of R-genes for marker assisted selection and the evaluation of their effectiveness are presented. The use of multiplex systems allows the presence of several genes for resistance to one or more pathogens to be analyzed at once. Mechanisms of potato quantitative resistance to S. endobioticum and PGN and adaptation processes in pathogens populations resulting in overcoming resistance of host are discussed. Cultivation of cultivars poorly susceptible to PGN can stimulate the adaptive variability of the pathogen and induce virulent pathotypes for 2β3 pathogen generations
Transmission of potato spindle tuber viroid between <i>Phytophthora infestans</i> and host plants
Potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd) is a naked, circular, single-stranded RNA (356β363 nucleotides in length) which lacks any protein-coding sequences. It is an economically important pathogen and is classified as a high-risk plant quarantine disease. Moreover, it is known that PSTVd is mechanically transmitted by vegetative plant propagation through infected pollen, and by aphids. The aim of this study is to determine the possibility of viroid transmission by potato pathogen Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. PSTVd-infected (strain VP87) potato cultivars Gala, Colomba, and Riviera were inoculated with P. infestans isolate PiVZR18, and in 7 days, after the appearance of symptoms, re-isolation of P. infestans on rye agar was conducted. RT-PCR diagnostics of PSTVd in a mixture of mycelia and sporangia were positive after 14 days of cultivation on rye agar. The PSTVd-infectedΒ P. infestans isolate PiVZR18v+ was used to inoculate the healthy, viroid-free plants of potato cv. Gala and tomatoΒ cv. Zagadka. After 60 days, an amplification fragment of PSTVd was detected in the tissues of one plant of tomatoΒ cv. Zagadka by RT-PCR with the primer set P3/P4, indicating successful transmission of PSTVd by P. infestans isolate PiVZR18v+. This result was confirmed by sequencing of the RT-PCR amplicon with primers P3/P4. The partial sequence of this amplicon was identical (99.5 %) to PSTVd strain VP87. RT-PCR showed the possibility of viroid stability in a pure culture of P. infestans isolate PiVZR18v+ after three consecutive passages on rye agar. PSTVd was not detected after the eighth passage on rye agar in P. infestans subculture. These results are initial evidence of potato viroid PSTVd being bidirectionally transferred between P. infestans and host plants
Quarantine nematode species and pathotypes potentially dangerous for domestic potato production: populations diversity and the genetics of potato resistance
The review considers quarantine species and nematode pathotypes potentially dangerous for domestic potato production. Potatoes are affected by more than 30 types of parasitic nematodes, but the review focuses on the most harmful representatives of genera that cause great damage to potato production: Globodera, Ditylenchus, Nacob bus and Meloidogyne. Phytopathological and molecular methods of identification of species and pathotypes and the main achievements in studying the population variability of parasitic potato nematodes were analyzed. It was shown that due to the peculiarities of the life cycle of nematodes and lability of their genomes, the genetic variability of these organisms is very high, which creates a threat of forming new pathogenic genotypes of the parasites. The information about the intra- and interpopulation variability of nematodes is important for studying the ways of introduction and distribution of separate species, as well as for searching for the correlations of molecular markers with the pathotype. Phylogenetic studies based on modern data on genetic variability of populations have allowed to reveal species complexes in Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens and Nacobbus aberrans (Thorne) Thorne & Allen (sensu lato), including cryptic species. The main components of successful protection preventing a wide distribution of parasitic nematodes are quarantine measures, agricultural techniques, biological methods of protection and cultivation of resistant cultivars. Special attention in the review is paid to the breeding of potato cultivars with durable resistance to various nematode pathotypes, because the cultivation of such varieties is the most ecologically safe and economically advantageous way to prevent epiphytoties. Currently, significant progress has been made in the genetic protection of potato cultivars, especially against cyst-forming nematodes. The review provides data on sources of potato resistance to parasitic nematodes identified in collections of wild and cultivated species. Data on identified R-gens and QTL of resistance that have been introduced into breeding varieties using different methods and approaches are analyzed. The literature data on the study of structural and functional organization of genes for resistance to potato cyst nematodes are given. The results of molecular research on revealing the polymorphisms of loci involved in the control of resistance to cyst and gall nematodes, the development of molecular markers of certain genes and their use in marker-assisted selection for developing of new resistant cultivars, including those with group resistance, are considered
- β¦