Sostituzione valvolare contemporanea dell'aorta, della mitrale e della tricuspide. Rischio operatorio. Risultati a breve e a lungo termine

N/

Surgical reconstruction of the left main coronary artery with patch-angioplasty

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been established as the treatment of choice for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis However, the conventional grafting provides a retrograde perfusion to extensive myocardial area and leads prospectively to competitive flow of the non-occluded coronaries thus consuming the grafts. Surgical reconstruction of the LMCA with patch-angioplasty is an alternative method that eliminates these drawbacks.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Between February 1997 and July 2007, 37 patients with isolated LMCA stenosis were referred for surgical ostial reconstruction. In 27 patients (73%) surgical angioplasties have been performed. All patients were followed up clinically and with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and coronary angiography when required.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In 10 patients (27%) a LMCA stenosis could not be confirmed. There were no early mortality or perioperative myocardial infarctions. The postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. In 25 patients, TEE demonstrated a wide open main stem flow pattern one to six months after reconstruction of the left main coronary artery with one patch mild aneurysmal dilated.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The surgical reconstruction with patch-angioplasty is a safe and effective method for the treatment of proximal and middle LMCA stenosis. Almost one third of the study group had no really LMCA stenosis: antegrade flow pattern remained sustained and the arterial grafts have been spared. In the cases of unclear or suspected LMCA stenosis, cardio-CT can be performed to unmask catheter-induced coronary spasm as the underlying reason for isolated LMCA stenosis.</p

How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery?

International audienceBACKGROUND: The benefit of arterial revascularization in coronary surgery remains controversial. The incremental value of additional grafts to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) has been mainly assessed according to the number of arterial grafts, possibly limiting the detection of its actual impact. We analyzed the influence of the number of distal arterial anastomoses (DAA) performed on late mortality in patients having received from one to three arterial grafts. METHODS: Retrospective review of 3685 primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed from 1989 to 2014 was conducted with a 13-year mean follow-up. One arterial graft (SITA) was used in 969 patients, two arterial grafts, ITA or gastroepiploic artery (GEA), in 1883 patients (BITA: 1644; SITA+GEA: 239), and three arterial grafts in 833 patients (BITA+GEA). Totally, 795 patients (22%) received one DAA, 1142 patients (31%) two, 1337 patients (36%) three, and 411 patients (11%) four or more. A sub-group analysis was done in the 2104 patients with 3-vessel disease who received at least 2 arterial grafts. RESULTS: In this series the early mortality was 1.6% and it was not influenced by the surgical technique. Late mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender, heart failure, LV ejection fraction, diabetes status, complete revascularization, number of arterial grafts, number of DAA, both ITA, sequential ITA graft, GEA graft. In multivariable analysis with Cox regression model, the number of DAA was the only technical significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p \textless 0.0001), predominant over both ITA, complete revascularization and number of arterial grafts. The impact of the number of DAA on survival was found discriminant from 1 to 3; after 3 there was no more additional effect. In 3-vessel disease patients who received at least 2 arterial grafts, the number of DAA remained a significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p \textless 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of distal arterial anastomoses is an independent predictor of long-term survival, predominant over the number of arterial grafts and the completeness of the revascularization; higher the number, better the late survival. It is a strong support of the extensive use of arterial grafting in CABG

Does the Addition of a Gastroepiploic Artery to Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Improve Survival?

International audienceIt is unclear whether the additional conduit to supplement bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) influences the patient outcome in coronary surgery. This retrospective study compared long-term survival of patients undergoing left-sided BITA grafting in which the third conduit to the right coronary system (RCA) was either vein graft (SVG) or gastroepiploic artery (GEA). From 1989 to 2014, 1432 consecutive patients underwent left-sided revascularization with BITA associated with SVG (n = 599) or GEA (n = 833) to RCA. Propensity score was calculated by logistic regression model and patients were matched 1 to 1 leading to 2 groups of 320 matched patients. The primary end point was the overall mortality from any cause. GEA was used in significantly lower risk patients. The 30-day mortality was 1.6% without influence of the graft configuration. Postoperative follow-up was 13.6 ± 6.6 years and was 94% complete. The significant difference in patients' survival observed at 20 years in favor of GEA in unmatched groups (48 ± 4% vs 33 ± 6%, P \textless 0.001) was not confirmed in matched groups (41 ± 7% vs 36 ± 7%, P = 0.112). In multivariable Cox model analysis, the conduit used to RCA did not influence the long-term survival in matched groups, like no other graft configuration or operative parameter. Only complete revascularization remained predictor of survival (P = 0.016), with age (P \textless 0.0001), diabetes status (P = 0.007), and left ventricle ejection fraction (P \textless 0.0001). Long-term survival in patients undergoing BITA grafting is not affected by using GEA as third arterial conduit in alternative to SVG. Further studies are necessary to assess its impact on long-term cardiac events

Cholesterol crystal embolization following coronarography. Is that against the surgical procedure? Discussion of one such patient

Authors report on one patient with cholesterol embolization following cardiac catheterization and coronary by-pass surgery. During the immediate post-operative period, neurological and renal complications occurred because of recurrent cholesterol embolization. One month after surgery the patient died from a sudden neurological coma. Cholesterol crystal embolization appears to be a contra-indication to heart surgery, even in a strongly symptomatic patient, when the spontaneous course of the existing cardiac disease is not life-threatening in the short term

Asymptomatic false aneurysm of the right coronary sinus treated by a reimplantation valve sparing technique

[DOI:\hrefhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.21132610.1510/icvts.2009.211326] [PubMed:\hrefhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1959670419596704]We describe the case of a 65-year-old man who presented with a false aneurysm of the right aortic coronary sinus, discovered after a routine medical examination. A complete resection of the aortic root and a reimplantation technique were performed. Herein, we describe the technical approach and immediate follow-up

Self-sealing antegrade cardioplegia system for video-assisted cardiac surgery: preliminary results

[DOI:\hrefhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e318148c72f10.1097/IMI.0b013e318148c72f] [PubMed:\hrefhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2243706322437063

Should a reimplantation valve sparing procedure be done systematically in type A aortic dissection?

articl

Preliminary experience with Impella Recover\textregistered LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: A new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit

SummaryAimCardiogenic shock is associated with high mortality. We report our experience with the short-term left ventricular axial pump Impella LP5.0 in nine patients with severe ischaemic heart failure.MethodsSix patients (group 1) presented with cardiogenic shock at the acute phase of an ST elevation myocardial infarction. Three patients (group 2) had severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy with temporary contra-indication to LVAD or transplantation. We measured haemodynamic and metabolic variables up to 96hours and recorded morbidity, mechanical pump failures, and mortality up to one year postimplantation.ResultsIn all patients the Impella LP5.0 was safely placed through the right subclavian artery. Cardiac power output increased from 0.64 (0.07) W to 0.94 (0.44) W and 1.02 (0.30) W at 24 and 72hours, respectively. The Impella LP5.0 remained in place for 12 (7.2) days. In group 1, five patients were in INTERMACS Profile 3 at the time of pump insertion. Three could be weaned and survived. One patient in INTERMACS Profile 1 died of intractable heart failure within hours. In group 2, two of three patients underwent heart transplantation. Haemorrhage requiring transfusions was observed in four patients but only one case was directly related to the Impella LP5.0.ConclusionLeft ventricular assistance with the Impella LP5.0 appears to be well tolerated. It may be especially useful in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who achieve INTERMACS Profile 3 with initial treatment