The Completeness of the Fossil Record of Mesozoic Birds: Implications for Early Avian Evolution

Many palaeobiological analyses have concluded that modern birds (Neornithes) radiated no earlier than the Maastrichtian, whereas molecular clock studies have argued for a much earlier origination. Here, we assess the quality of the fossil record of Mesozoic avian species, using a recently proposed character completeness metric which calculates the percentage of phylogenetic characters that can be scored for each taxon. Estimates of fossil record quality are plotted against geological time and compared to estimates of species level diversity, sea level, and depositional environment. Geographical controls on the avian fossil record are investigated by comparing the completeness scores of species in different continental regions and latitudinal bins. Avian fossil record quality varies greatly with peaks during the Tithonian-early Berriasian, Aptian, and Coniacian–Santonian, and troughs during the Albian-Turonian and the Maastrichtian. The completeness metric correlates more strongly with a ‘sampling corrected’ residual diversity curve of avian species than with the raw taxic diversity curve, suggesting that the abundance and diversity of birds might influence the probability of high quality specimens being preserved. There is no correlation between avian completeness and sea level, the number of fluviolacustrine localities or a recently constructed character completeness metric of sauropodomorph dinosaurs. Comparisons between the completeness of Mesozoic birds and sauropodomorphs suggest that small delicate vertebrate skeletons are more easily destroyed by taphonomic processes, but more easily preserved whole. Lagerstätten deposits might therefore have a stronger impact on reconstructions of diversity of smaller organisms relative to more robust forms. The relatively poor quality of the avian fossil record in the Late Cretaceous combined with very patchy regional sampling means that it is possible neornithine lineages were present throughout this interval but have not yet been sampled or are difficult to identify because of the fragmentary nature of the specimens

Unique caudal plumage of Jeholornis and complex tail evolution in early birds

The Early Cretaceous bird Jeholornis was previously only known to have a distally restricted ornamental frond of tail feathers. We describe a previously unrecognized fan-shaped tract of feathers situated dorsal to the proximal caudal vertebrae. The position and morphology of these feathers is reminiscent of the specialized upper tail coverts observed in males of some sexually dimorphic neornithines. As in the neornithine tail, the unique “two-tail” plumage in Jeholornis probably evolved as the result of complex interactions between natural and sexual selective pressures and served both aerodynamic and ornamental functions. We suggest that the proximal fan would have helped to streamline the body and reduce drag whereas the distal frond was primarily ornamental. Jeholornis reveals that tail evolution was complex and not a simple progression from frond to fan.Fil: O'Connor, Jingmai. Chinese Academy Of Sciences. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; República de ChinaFil: Wang, Xiaoli. Linyi University; ChinaFil: Sullivan, Corwin. Chinese Academy Of Sciences. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; República de ChinaFil: Zheng, Xiaoting. Linyi University; China. Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature; ChinaFil: Tubaro, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Zhang, Xiaomei. Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature; ChinaFil: Zhou, Zhonghe. Chinese Academy Of Sciences. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; República de Chin

Mummified precocial bird wings in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber

Our knowledge of Cretaceous plumage is limited by the fossil record itself: compression fossils surrounding skeletons lack the finest morphological details and seldom preserve visible traces of colour, while discoveries in amber have been disassociated from their source animals. Here we report the osteology, plumage and pterylosis of two exceptionally preserved theropod wings from Burmese amber, with vestiges of soft tissues. The extremely small size and osteological development of the wings, combined with their digit proportions, strongly suggests that the remains represent precocial hatchlings of enantiornithine birds. These specimens demonstrate that the plumage types associated with modern birds were present within single individuals of Enantiornithes by the Cenomanian (99 million years ago), providing insights into plumage arrangement and microstructure alongside immature skeletal remains. This finding brings new detail to our understanding of infrequently preserved juveniles, including the first concrete examples of follicles, feather tracts and apteria in Cretaceous avialans

Morphology and distribution of scales, dermal ossifications, and other non-feather integumentary structures in non-avialan theropod dinosaurs

Modern birds are typified by the presence of feathers, complex evolutionary innovations that were already widespread in the group of theropod dinosaurs (Maniraptoriformes) that include crown Aves. Squamous or scaly reptilian-like skin is, however, considered the plesiomorphic condition for theropods and dinosaurs more broadly. Here, we review the morphology and distribution of non-feathered integumentary structures in non-avialan theropods, covering squamous skin and naked skin as well as dermal ossifications. The integumentary record of non-averostran theropods is limited to tracks, which ubiquitously show a covering of tiny reticulate scales on the plantar surface of the pes. This is consistent also with younger averostran body fossils, which confirm an arthral arrangement of the digital pads. Among averostrans, squamous skin is confirmed in Ceratosauria (Carnotaurus), Allosauroidea (Allosaurus, Concavenator, Lourinhanosaurus), Compsognathidae (Juravenator), and Tyrannosauroidea (Santanaraptor, Albertosaurus, Daspletosaurus, Gorgosaurus, Tarbosaurus, Tyrannosaurus), whereas dermal ossifications consisting of sagittate and mosaic osteoderms are restricted to Ceratosaurus. Naked, non-scale bearing skin is found in the contentious tetanuran Sciurumimus, ornithomimosaurians (Ornithomimus) and possibly tyrannosauroids (Santanaraptor), and also on the patagia of scansoriopterygids (Ambopteryx, Yi). Scales are surprisingly conservative among non-avialan theropods compared to some dinosaurian groups (e.g. hadrosaurids); however, the limited preservation of tegument on most specimens hinders further interrogation. Scale patterns vary among and/or within body regions in Carnotaurus, Concavenator and Juravenator, and include polarised, snake-like ventral scales on the tail of the latter two genera. Unusual but more uniformly distributed patterning also occurs in Tyrannosaurus, whereas feature scales are present only in Albertosaurus and Carnotaurus. Few theropods currently show compelling evidence for the co-occurrence of scales and feathers (e.g. Juravenator, Sinornithosaurus), although reticulate scales were probably retained on the mani and pedes of many theropods with a heavy plumage. Feathers and filamentous structures appear to have replaced widespread scaly integuments in maniraptorans. Theropod skin, and that of dinosaurs more broadly, remains a virtually untapped area of study and the appropriation of commonly used techniques in other palaeontological fields to the study of skin holds great promise for future insights into the biology, taphonomy and relationships of these extinct animals.Fil: Hendrickx, Christophe Marie Fabian. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Bell, Phil R.. University Of New England; AustraliaFil: Pittman, Michael. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Milner, Andrew R. C.. No especifíca;Fil: Cuesta Fidalgo, Elena. Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie; AlemaniaFil: O'Connor, Jingmai. No especifíca;Fil: Loewen, Mark. No especifíca;Fil: Currie, Philip J.. University of Alberta; CanadáFil: Mateus, Octávio. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; PortugalFil: Kaye, Thomas G.. Foundation For Scientific Advancement; Estados UnidosFil: Delcourt, Rafael. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasi

The saga of birds

Sankar Chatterjee 2015. The Rise of Birds. 225 Million Years of Evolution. Second Edition. 370 pp. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1-4214-1590-1 (hardcover). Price $59.95; e-book$59.95

Dinosaur paleohistology : Review, trends and new avenues of investigation

In the mid-19th century, the discovery that bone microstructure in fossils could be preserved with fidelity provided a new avenue for understanding the evolution, function, and physiology of long extinct organisms. This resulted in the establishment of paleohistology as a subdiscipline of vertebrate paleontology, which has contributed greatly to our current understanding of dinosaurs as living organisms. Dinosaurs are part of a larger group of reptiles, the Archosauria, of which there are only two surviving lineages, crocodilians and birds. The goal of this review is to document progress in the field of archosaur paleohistology, focusing in particular on the Dinosauria. We briefly review the "growth age" of dinosaur histology, which has encompassed new and varied directions since its emergence in the 1950s, resulting in a shift in the scientific perception of non-avian dinosaurs from "sluggish" reptiles to fast-growing animals with relatively high metabolic rates. However, fundamental changes in growth occurred within the sister clade Aves, and we discuss this major evolutionary transition as elucidated by histology. We then review recent innovations in the field, demonstrating how paleohistology has changed and expanded to address a diversity of non-growth related questions. For example, dinosaur skull histology has elucidated the formation of curious cranial tissues (e.g., "metaplastic" tissues), and helped to clarify the evolution and function of oral adaptations, such as the dental batteries of duck-billed dinosaurs. Lastly, we discuss the development of novel techniques with which to investigate not only the skeletal tissues of dinosaurs, but also less-studied soft-tissues, through molecular paleontology and paleohistochemistry-recently developed branches of paleohistology- and the future potential of these methods to further explore fossilized tissues. We suggest that the combination of histological and molecular methods holds great potential for examining the preserved tissues of dinosaurs, basal birds, and their extant relatives. This review demonstrates the importance of traditional bone paleohistology, but also highlights the need for innovation and new analytical directions to improve and broaden the utility of paleohistology, in the pursuit of more diverse, highly specific, and sensitive methods with which to further investigate important paleontological questions

A new ornithuromorph (Aves) with an elongate rostrum from the Jehol Biota, and the early evolution of rostralization in birds

<p>A new species of Early Cretaceous ornithuromorph with an elongate rostrum is described from the Sihedang locality of the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation in north-eastern China. Like the longipterygid enantiornithines, rostral elongation in <i>Dingavis longimaxilla</i> gen. et sp. nov. is achieved primarily through the maxilla, whereas neornithines elongate the premaxilla and rostralization is far more extreme than observed in early birds. Notably, in the rostrum of <i>Xinghaiornis</i>, the most ‘longirostrine’ Early Cretaceous ornithuromorph, the premaxilla and maxilla contribute to the rostrum equally. These lineages together highlight the diversity of configurations in which early birds experimented with rostralization of the skull. The 65% upper limit in rostral proportions of Early Cretaceous taxa with elongate maxillae and the fact that this morphology was abandoned in more derived taxa suggests that in Aves this skull configuration provided less structural stability.</p> <p><a href="http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:" target="_blank">http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:</a>9D8A429F-BBA7-47EF-BFD0-ADFB7118833A</p

forelimb is considered (c). Non-avian coelurosaurians are shown in grey, Oviraptorosauria in purple, Scansoriopterygidae in red, Deinonychosauria in green and Aves in blue. Silhouette of Archaeopteryx was from http:// phylopic.org/. Line drawings of the forelimbs of Deinocheirus, Microraptor, Ambopteryx and Dapingfangensis highlight the fact that, uniquely, scansoriopterygids have an elongate forelimb but short metacarpals. in A new Jurassic scansoriopterygid and the loss of membranous wings in theropod dinosaurs

forelimb is considered (c). Non-avian coelurosaurians are shown in grey, Oviraptorosauria in purple, Scansoriopterygidae in red, Deinonychosauria in green and Aves in blue. Silhouette of Archaeopteryx was from http:// phylopic.org/. Line drawings of the forelimbs of Deinocheirus, Microraptor, Ambopteryx and Dapingfangensis highlight the fact that, uniquely, scansoriopterygids have an elongate forelimb but short metacarpals

Extended Data Fig. 1 in A new Jurassic scansoriopterygid and the loss of membranous wings in theropod dinosaurs

Extended Data Fig. 1 | Additional photographs of Ambopteryx, IVPP V24192. a, Counter slab. b, Skeletal reconstruction based on preserved bones. c, Skull. d, Gastroliths and the unidentified bony stomach content. Abbreviations as in Fig. 1, except for: fe, feather associated with the neck