31 research outputs found

    Organic compounds in Saturn's E-ring and its compositional profile in the vicinity of Rhea

    Get PDF
    The general topic of this dissertation is the analysis of impact ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of ice grains in Saturn’s E ring sampled in-situ by the Cosmic Dust Analyzer (CDA) onboard the Cassini-Huygens spacecraft. The source of these E ring ice grains is the subsurface ocean of Saturn’s cryo-volcanically active icy moon Enceladus. The Chemical Analyzer subsystem of CDA generated mass spectra of cations that form when the ice grains impinge onto the instrument’s target plate with high speed. The first aim of this work is a detailed compositional analysis of the organic material in the ice grains ejected from subsurface Enceladus’ into the E ring. Many of these ice grains carry diverse organic material that is characterized in this work. A laser-based analogue laboratory experiment is used to simulate the impact ionization CDA spectra of ice grains enriched in organic material. This experiment allowed to understand the varying cationic fragmentation patterns from organic material in a water ice matrix. Despite the relatively low mass resolution of the CDA, results of the analogue experiment allow to identify characteristic finger prints of certain classes of organic compounds in many CDA mass spectra. Three main categories are classified: (i) Amine-, (ii) Carbonyl-, and (iii) Aromatic-type mass spectra. Furthermore, some aromatic-type CDA spectra show features that correspond to breakup-products of larger complex aromatic species with masses above 200u. On the whole, the analysis of E ring ice grains in this work gives first insights into the largely varying and complex organic chemistry inside the ocean of Enceladus. The second aim of this thesis is to infer the compositional profile of ice particles in the E ring in the vicinity of Saturn’s moon Rhea, from a series of spectra recorded on Cassini’s Rhea flyby (R4) in 2013. No striking change in the frequency of different compositional types is observed along the spacecraft trajectory. However, a varying size distribution of different compositional populations of ice grains is observed and discussed. Sodium salts and organic compounds are more frequent in relatively large ice grains, whereas pure water ice particles become more abundant in smaller E ring grains. A generally higher number density of ice grains is observed in the close vicinity of Rhea, which might indicate either the presence of an ejecta cloud from Rhea’s surface or a general confinement of particles near the equatorial plane of the E ring

    Complementary Mass Spectral Analysis of Isomeric O-bearing Organic Compounds and Fragmentation Differences through Analog Techniques for Spaceborne Mass Spectrometers

    Get PDF
    Mass spectrometers on board spacecraft typically use either impact ionization or electron ionization (EI) as ion sources. Understanding the similarities and differences in the spectral signatures and fragmentation patterns produced by different techniques in mass spectrometry could elucidate the composition of organic compounds. Here we present a comparison between the mass spectra obtained through laser-induced liquid beam ion desorption (LILBID; proven to simulate the impact ionization mass spectra of ice grains) and EI mass spectra of pairs of low-mass, isomeric aldehydes and ketones. Our comparison confirms that EI produces more fragmentation of carbonyl compounds, particularly aldehydes, than LILBID. We find protonated molecular ions [M+H]+ in LILBID but molecular ions [M]+ in EI spectra. From the evaluated species, LILBID generally produces oxygen-carrying fragment ions (e.g., [CHO]+ and [C2H3O]+) in the mass ranges 26–30 and 39–44 u, while in EI, most ions in these ranges correspond to hydrocarbon fragments. The LILBID spectra additionally show mostly protonated oxygen-bearing fragments [CH3O]+ and [C2H5O]+ at m/z 31 and 45, less commonly observed in EI spectra. We observe a decrease in the relative intensities of cation fragment mass lines between m/z 26 and 33 and an increase between m/z 39 and 45, with an increasing carbon number for ketones and aldehydes with LILBID and EI, respectively. Our study provides a basis for complementary compositional analysis to identify the structural properties of organic species in a space environment using different spaceborne mass spectrometers (e.g., SUrface Dust Analyzer and MAss Spectrometer for Planetary EXploration) on board NASA’s future Europa Clipper space mission

    Detection of phosphates originating from Enceladus’s ocean

    Get PDF
    Saturn’s moon Enceladus harbours a global1 ice-covered water ocean2,3. The Cassini spacecraft investigated the composition of the ocean by analysis of material ejected into space by the moon’s cryovolcanic plume4,5,6,7,8,9. The analysis of salt-rich ice grains by Cassini’s Cosmic Dust Analyzer10 enabled inference of major solutes in the ocean water (Na+, K+, Cl–, HCO3–, CO32–) and its alkaline pH3,11. Phosphorus, the least abundant of the bio-essential elements12,13,14, has not yet been detected in an ocean beyond Earth. Earlier geochemical modelling studies suggest that phosphate might be scarce in the ocean of Enceladus and other icy ocean worlds15,16. However, more recent modelling of mineral solubilities in Enceladus’s ocean indicates that phosphate could be relatively abundant17. Here we present Cassini’s Cosmic Dust Analyzer mass spectra of ice grains emitted by Enceladus that show the presence of sodium phosphates. Our observational results, together with laboratory analogue experiments, suggest that phosphorus is readily available in Enceladus’s ocean in the form of orthophosphates, with phosphorus concentrations at least 100-fold higher in the moon’s plume-forming ocean waters than in Earth’s oceans. Furthermore, geochemical experiments and modelling demonstrate that such high phosphate abundances could be achieved in Enceladus and possibly in other icy ocean worlds beyond the primordial CO2 snowline, either at the cold seafloor or in hydrothermal environments with moderate temperatures. In both cases the main driver is probably the higher solubility of calcium phosphate minerals compared with calcium carbonate in moderately alkaline solutions rich in carbonate or bicarbonate ions

    Is There Such a Thing as a Biosignature?

    Get PDF
    The concept of a biosignature is widely used in astrobiology to suggest a link between some observation and a biological cause, given some context. The term itself has been defined and used in several ways in different parts of the scientific community involved in the search for past or present life on Earth and beyond. With the ongoing acceleration in the search for life in distant time and/or deep space, there is a need for clarity and accuracy in the formulation and reporting of claims. Here, we critically review the biosignature concept(s) and the associated nomenclature in light of several problems and ambiguities emphasized by recent works. One worry is that these terms and concepts may imply greater certainty than is usually justified by a rational interpretation of the data. A related worry is that terms such as “biosignature” may be inherently misleading, for example, because the divide between life and non-life—and their observable effects—is fuzzy. Another worry is that different parts of the multidisciplinary community may use non-equivalent or conflicting definitions and conceptions, leading to avoidable confusion. This review leads us to identify a number of pitfalls and to suggest how they can be circumvented. In general, we conclude that astrobiologists should exercise particular caution in deciding whether and how to use the concept of biosignature when thinking and communicating about habitability or life. Concepts and terms should be selected carefully and defined explicitly where appropriate. This would improve clarity and accuracy in the formulation of claims and subsequent technical and public communication about some of the most profound and important questions in science and society. With this objective in mind, we provide a checklist of questions that scientists and other interested parties should ask when assessing any reported detection of a “biosignature” to better understand exactly what is being claimed

    Developing a Laser Induced Liquid Beam Ion Desorption Spectral Database as Reference for Spaceborne Mass Spectrometers

    Get PDF
    Spaceborne impact ionization mass spectrometers, such as the Cosmic Dust Analyzer on board the past Cassini spacecraft or the SUrface Dust Analyzer being built for NASA's upcoming Europa Clipper mission, are of crucial importance for the exploration of icy moons in the Solar System, such as Saturn's moon Enceladus or Jupiter's moon Europa. For the interpretation of data produced by these instruments, analogue experiments on Earth are essential. To date, thousands of laboratory mass spectra have been recorded with an analogue experiment for impact ionization mass spectrometers. Simulation of mass spectra of ice grains in space is achieved by a Laser Induced Liquid Beam Ion Desorption (LILBID) approach. The desorbed cations or anions are analyzed in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The amount of unstructured raw data is increasingly challenging to sort, process, interpret and compare with data from space. Thus far this has been achieved manually for individual mass spectra because no database containing the recorded reference spectra was available. Here we describe the development of a comprehensive, extendable database containing cation and anion mass spectra from the laboratory LILBID facility. The database is based on a Relational Database Management System with a web server interface and enables filtering of the laboratory data using a wide range of parameters. The mass spectra can be compared not only with data from past and future space missions but also mass spectral data generated by other, terrestrial, techniques. The validated and approved subset of the database is available for general public (https://lilbid-db.planet.fu-berlin.de)

    The Science Case for a Return to Enceladus

    Get PDF
    The plume of Enceladus is unique in the solar system in providing direct access to fresh material from an extraterrestrial subsurface ocean. The Cassini Mission, though not specifically designed for it, was able to take advantage of the plume to conduct the best characterization to date of an extraterrestrial ocean. Evidence gathered from multiple instruments points to a global, subsurface liquid water ocean rich in salts and organic compounds, with water-rock interactions occurring presumably in hydrothermal systems at or below the moon’s sea floor. Meeting the criteria of “extended regions of liquid water, conditions favorable for the assembly of complex organic molecules, and energy source(s) to sustain metabolism,” the ocean of Enceladus can therefore be considered habitable. It is also the only confirmed place beyond the Earth where we can easily sample fresh material from a demonstrably habitable environment without the complications of digging or drilling. The next step is to investigate whether Enceladus’ ocean is actually inhabited. Here, we summarize the evidence for Enceladus’ ocean and its habitability, identify constraints and outstanding questions on the detectability of life within its ocean, and recommend a return to Enceladus with a dedicated search-for-life mission (or missions)

    Is there such a thing as a biosignature?

    Get PDF
    The concept of a biosignature is widely used in astrobiology to suggest a link between some observation and a biological cause, given some context. The term itself has been defined and used in several ways in different parts of the scientific community involved in the search for past or present life on Earth and beyond. With the ongoing acceleration in the search for life in distant time and/or deep space, there is a need for clarity and accuracy in the formulation and reporting of claims. Here, we critically review the biosignature concept(s) and the associated nomenclature in light of several problems and ambiguities emphasized by recent works. One worry is that these terms and concepts may imply greater certainty than is usually justified by a rational interpretation of the data. A related worry is that terms such as “biosignature” may be inherently misleading, for example, because the divide between life and non-life—and their observable effects—is fuzzy. Another worry is that different parts of the multidisciplinary community may use non-equivalent or conflicting definitions and conceptions, leading to avoidable confusion. This review leads us to identify a number of pitfalls and to suggest how they can be circumvented. In general, we conclude that astrobiologists should exercise particular caution in deciding whether and how to use the concept of biosignature when thinking and communicating about habitability or life. Concepts and terms should be selected carefully and defined explicitly where appropriate. This would improve clarity and accuracy in the formulation of claims and subsequent technical and public communication about some of the most profound and important questions in science and society. With this objective in mind, we provide a checklist of questions that scientists and other interested parties should ask when assessing any reported detection of a “biosignature” to better understand exactly what is being claimed
    corecore