International forum. an investigation of iron status in blood donors

No abstract availabl

Plasma as a Therapeutic Principle in Clinical Practice : With Special Reference to Sweden

The newly established Swedish Apheresis Registry makes it possible to do national inter-center comparisons. This study was undertaken to describe and analyze the use of therapeutic apheresis and the adverse effects in such therapy. The special case of plasma exchange as rescue therapy in multi-organ failure, including renal failure, was also studied. In Sweden, plasma for transfusion is prepared and stored to ensure rapid availability. Due to new EU legislation, validation of such plasma was performed. The analysis indicated that the use of therapeutic apheresis was in line with recommendations of other international societies. The frequency and types of adverse effects were comparable to those reported in other studies from analogous time periods. Compared with other countries, it appears that more therapeutic resources are available in Sweden and that there is a lower frequency of adverse effects in specific procedures. No fatalities were reported. The unique comparison of differences between centers regarding plasma exchange identified areas for further improvement. The study on plasma exchange as rescue therapy in severe sepsis or septic shock is the second largest reported. The result was promising, with a survival rate of 82%. The rapid availability of plasma for transfusion appears to be of clinical importance in patients with early coagulopathy and severe trauma but the present selection and storage procedures for plasma lead to a time-dependent increase of the number of units with cold-induced activation of the contact system and C1 inhibitor consumption before day 14. Improvements of plasma quality can be attained by using plasma from male donors only and by reducing the storage time from 14 to 7 days. Further studies are needed to define the role of plasma exchange in severe sepsis/septic shock, to evaluate the outcome of each patient’s treatment and to establish the indications for the transfusion of plasma

Transmission of viral hepatitis through blood transfusion in Sweden, 1968 to 2012

Introduction: Viral hepatitis remains a significant threat to transfusion safety, although largely mitigated by donor screening. Aim: Our objective was to estimate the past and present burden of transfusion transmission of all types of viral hepatitis (A to E) and to find undiagnosed infections with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a database of the entire computerised transfusion experience of Sweden from 1968 to 2012 and linking it to a nationwide database of notifiable infections. We then used two independent statistical approaches. Firstly, we tracked recipients of blood from donors with confirmed viral hepatitis. Secondly, we computed a donor-specific risk score, defined as the difference between the observed and the expected number of HCV infections among all previous recipients of all donors, where thresholds were determined using simulation. Results: Among 1,146,307 transfused patients, more than 5,000 were infected with HCV. Transfusion transmission only occurred before 1992 when donor screening had been completely implemented. Overall, we found 44 donors and 1,180 recipients likely to be infected with HCV who were still alive but who remained undiagnosed. Conclusion: There is still a substantial number of individuals in Sweden who have probably been infected with HCV through blood transfusion and who are still unaware of their infection. We recommend that a follow-up study should be conducted to validate the method we used by approaching these individuals and offer testing. This would also serve as an opportunity to offer treatment to those who remain infected

Frequent platelet donation is associated with lymphopenia and risk of infections : A nationwide cohort study

Background: Recently, plateletpheresis donations using a widely used leukoreduction system (LRS) chamber have been associated with T-cell lymphopenia. However, clinical health consequences of plateletpheresis-associated lymphopenia are still unknown. Study Design and Methods: A nationwide cohort study using the SCANDAT3-S database was conducted with all platelet- and plasmapheresis donors in Sweden between 1996 and 2017. A Cox proportional hazards model, using donations as time-dependent exposures, was used to assess the risk of infections associated with plateletpheresis donations using an LRS chamber. Results: A total of 74 408 apheresis donors were included. Among donors with the same donation frequency, plateletpheresis donors using an LRS chamber were at an increased risk of immunosuppression-related infections and common bacterial infections in a dose-dependent manner. While very frequent donors and infections were rare in absolute terms resulting in wide confidence intervals (CIs), the increased risk was significant starting at one-third or less of the allowed donation frequency in a 10-year exposure window, with hazard ratios reaching 10 or more. No plateletpheresis donors that used an LRS chamber experienced a Pneumocystis jirovecii, aspergillus, disseminated mycobacterial, or cryptococcal infection. In a subcohort (n = 42), donations with LRS were associated with low CD4+ T-cell counts (Pearson's R = -0.41; 95% CI, - 0.63 to -0.12). Conclusion: Frequent plateletpheresis donation using an LRS chamber was associated with CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia and an increased risk of infections. These findings suggest a need to monitor T-lymphocyte counts in frequent platelet donors and to conduct future investigations of long-term donor health and for regulators to consider steps to mitigate lymphodepletion in donors