Ohio. Memorial of citizens of the County of Miami, in the State of Ohio, in relation to the Indian tribes.

Mem. of Citizens of Ohio. 3 May. HR 302, 21-1, v3, 1p. [201] Ask Government aid for removal and colonization of Indians

Creativity and Assessment in Arts Education: Individual Differences in Creative Activities

　本研究は一昨年発表した「芸術教育における創造の場」（2021）の追研究であり，芸術作品の評価のあり方について検討したものである。創り手および他教科の視点を交えて，教育現場でおこなわれている生徒一人ひとりの創造的活動に焦点をあてるための手立てについて考察した。自己と対峙しながらコスモロジーを醸成し，個人としての創造性を練り上げること，モノやコトを空間的に俯瞰したり想像したりすることを通して視点を広げることを検討し，あわせて，個人のクリエイティブな思考や新しい価値創造を客観的に評価するための評価項目の提案と，ブルームの理論をもとに，情意領域に関する評価のあり方について提案をおこなった

Finding of Probable Tsunami Boulders on Jiupeng Coast in Southeastern Taiwan

We find three coral boulders (approx. 5 m across) resting on the Holocene coral terrace on the Jiupeng coast of southeastern Taiwan. Three exotic corals on the outer part of the boulders are dated at ca. 5000 yr BP which is similar to that of in situ corals composing the Holocene terrace. We interpret that these boulders were broken off from the coral terrace and were transported by tsunami waves, although the timing of the paleotsunami is not determined at this stage

The 1999 Earthquake Fault and Its Repeated Occurrence at the Earthquake Museum, Central Part of Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan

This paper reports on the trench log data covering the Chelungpu Fault preserved at the National Science Museum and 10 bore hole data across the fault. Trench log indicates the vertical offset of the 1999 displacement of terrace deposits is ca. 1.5 m and the presence of four branch faults cutting terrace deposits within 1.8 m width zone. Estimated height difference of bedrock surface based on bore hole data is more than 4.2 - 5.8 m, larger than the offset by the 1999 earthquake. These facts imply that at least one earthquake event occurred at this site before the 1999 earthquake. We also estimate the fault plane dips eastward at about 30 degrees based on the location and stratigraphy of one bore hole which penetrates the terrace gravel on the hanging wall through the bedrock

Triangulation scale error caused by the 1894 Shonai earthquake: a possible cause of erroneous interpretation of seismic potential along the Japan Trench

Abstract Horizontal crustal strain in the Tohoku area during the twentieth century based on triangulation showed N–S extension and E–W contraction was not significant. This feature was one of the reasons why the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake was unexpected for many scientists. The first triangulation conducted in the late nineteenth century used a length scale defined by baseline surveys, direct measurements of short (2–10 km) baselines with steel rods. The Shionohara baseline in the Yamagata prefecture was measured in May–July 1894 and the 1894 Shonai (M7.0) earthquake occurred in its western neighbor 3 months after the measurement. The earthquake possibly elongated the baseline by as large as 5 cm or 10 ppm. However, the original length measured before the earthquake was used for the network adjustment of the entire triangulation network, causing extensive underestimation of the length scale of the network as large as 5–10 ppm in northeast Japan. The scale error effect was comparable to tectonic deformation signal over 100 years. The baseline length was re-surveyed in 2012, 1 year after the Tohoku-oki earthquake, and the result is consistent with the hypothesis of scale bias considering interseismic deformation

MOESM2 of Triangulation scale error caused by the 1894 Shonai earthquake: a possible cause of erroneous interpretation of seismic potential along the Japan Trench

Additional file 2. Distribution of fault models listed in Table 4 for the calculation of coseismic changes at the Shionohara baseline

MOESM1 of Triangulation scale error caused by the 1894 Shonai earthquake: a possible cause of erroneous interpretation of seismic potential along the Japan Trench

Additional file 1. Crustal strain during the 100 years after correction of coseismic changes of angles and the baseline length based on a hypothesized fault model for the 1894 Shonai earthquake. (a) Case of + 5 cm of the Shionohara baseline. (b) Case of + 10 cm