5 research outputs found

    Chiral and Racemic Tetramorphs of 2,6-Di-<i>t</i>-Butylditolylfuchsone

    No full text
    The title molecule 4-(α,α-ditolylmethylene)-2,6-di-<i>t</i>-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone (abbreviated as di-<i>t</i>-butylditolylfuchsone and numbered 2-<i>t</i>-Bu) serendipitously afforded four concomitant polymorphs during routine purification by column chromatography in the same solvent elution fraction. Polymorph I crystallized in chiral space group <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub>. Polymorphs II, III, and IV crystallized in centrosymmetric space groups <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub>/<i>n</i>, <i>Pbca</i>, and <i>C</i>2/<i>c</i>, respectively. The role of bulky <i>t</i>-Bu groups for crystallization in the chiral space group is discussed for 2,6-ditolyl and 2,6-diphenyl fuchsones. α,α-Diphenylmethylene-2,6-di-<i>t</i>-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone (di-<i>t</i>-butyldiphenylfuchsone, 1-<i>t</i>-Bu) crystallized in <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub> (one polymorph) and <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub>/<i>c</i> (two polymorphs) space groups. Unfavorable steric repulsions due to bulky <i>t</i>-Bu groups result in voids in the crystal structures of centrosymmetric polymorphs II and III. Phase transformation of racemic structure II to III and finally to chiral polymorph I was monitored by thermal microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. X-ray diffraction confirmed the phase transformation to be a single-crystal-to-single-crystal event. The chiral polymorph I is the stable modification in the tetramorphic system. Several randomly picked single crystals of 2-<i>t</i>-Bu polymorph I had the same absolute chirality by circular dichroism spectroscopy. A new molecule capable of exhibiting conformational chirality via atropisomerism is identified

    A global benchmark study using affinity-based biosensors

    Get PDF
    International audienceTo explore the variability in biosensor studies, 150 participants from 20 countries were given the same protein samples and asked to determine kinetic rate constants for the interaction. We chose a protein system that was amenable to analysis using different biosensor platforms as well as by users of different expertise levels. The two proteins (a 50-kDa Fab and a 60-kDa glutathione S-transferase [GST] antigen) form a relatively high-affinity complex, so participants needed to optimize several experimental parameters, including ligand immobilization and regeneration conditions as well as analyte concentrations and injection/dissociation times. Although most participants collected binding responses that could be fit to yield kinetic parameters, the quality of a few data sets could have been improved by optimizing the assay design. Once these outliers were removed, the average reported affinity across the remaining panel of participants was 620 pM with a standard deviation of 980 pM. These results demonstrate that when this biosensor assay was designed and executed appropriately, the reported rate constants were consistent, and independent of which protein was immobilized and which biosensor was used. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

    A global benchmark study using affinity-based biosensors

    No full text
    corecore