70 research outputs found

    Incidence of erythropoietin antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia: the Prospective Immunogenicity Surveillance Registry (PRIMS)

    Get PDF
    Background: Subcutaneous administration of Eprex(®) (epoetin alfa) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) was contraindicated in the European Union between 2002 and 2006 after increased reports of anti-erythropoietin antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). The Prospective Immunogenicity Surveillance Registry (PRIMS) was conducted to estimate the incidence of antibody-mediated PRCA with subcutaneous administration of a new coated-stopper syringe presentation of Eprex(®) and to compare this with the PRCA incidence with subcutaneous NeoRecormon(®) (epoetin beta) and Aranesp(®) (darbepoetin alfa). Methods: PRIMS was a multicentre, multinational, non-interventional, parallel-group, immunogenicity surveillance registry. Adults with CKD receiving or about to initiate subcutaneous Eprex(®), NeoRecormon(®) or Aranesp(®) for anaemia were enrolled and followed for up to 3 years. Unexplained loss or lack of effect (LOE), including suspected PRCA, was reported, with antibody testing for confirmation of PRCA. Results: Of the 15 333 patients enrolled, 5948 received Eprex(®) (8377 patient-years) and 9356 received NeoRecormon(®)/Aranesp(®) (14 286 patient-years). No treatment data were available for 29 patients. Among 23 patients with LOE, five cases of PRCA were confirmed (Eprex(®), n = 3; NeoRecormon(®), n = 1; Aranesp(®), n = 1). Based on exposed time, PRCA incidence was 35.8/100 000 patient-years (95% CI 7.4-104.7) for Eprex(®) versus 14.0/100 000 patient-years (95% CI 1.7-50.6) for NeoRecormon(®)/Aranesp(®). The incidence of PRCA with Eprex(®) was not significantly different versus comparator ESAs (rate ratio: 2.56; 95% CI 0.43-15.31). An analysis based on observed time produced similar findings. Conclusion: This large, prospective registry demonstrates that PRCA is rare with subcutaneous administration of either the new coated-stopper syringe presentation of Eprex(®), or NeoRecormon(®) or Aranesp(®).This study was funded by Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson

    Etude de la physiopathologie de la polyglobulie de Vaquez (recherche d' anomalies dans la transduction du signal)

    No full text
    PARIS7-Bibliothèque centrale (751132105) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Biosimilars need comparative clinical data

    No full text

    Role of tyrosine kinases and phosphatases in polycythemia vera.

    No full text
    Protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and phosphatases (PTPs) play a crucial role in normal cell development, and dysfunction of these enzymes has been implicated in human cancers. Polycythemia vera (PV) is a clonal hematologic disease characterized by hypersensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to growth factors and cytokines. Recently, a unique and clonal mutation in the JAK homology 2 (JH2) domain of JAK2 that results in a valine to phenylalanine substitution at position 617 (V617F) was found in the majority of PV patients. This mutation leads to constitutive JAK2 activation and abnormal signaling and induces erythrocytosis in an animal model. The mutation is also found in a significant percentage of patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis (50%) and essential thrombocythemia (30%). Thus, it seems probable that this mutation associates with other molecular genetic events to cause different myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs). One of these secondary events is the transition to homozygosity of the mutated gene in 30% of the PV patients. Other events may include defects in PTPs, but these remain to be characterized. Recent studies represent a great step forward in the molecular pathogenesis in PV and the development of targeted new drugs to treat the disease
    corecore