William Mitchell Opinion - Volume 20, No. 6, April 1978

Selected Table of Contents Professor Draws Controversy / Loretta Frederick; Tom Copeland Counterpoint on Juvenile Justice / Bob Davis Update on Minority Recruitment / Tom Copeland Administration Criticizes Opinion Reporting Evaluating Student Evaluations / Tom Copeland Irving Younger on Legal Education / Michael Moriarity Work-Study Student Profiles Nick Schaps: In Memoriam Editorial Board Loretta Frederick, Michael T. Norton, Tom Copeland, Ken Davishttps://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion/1060/thumbnail.jp

A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research

This manuscript is a contribution of the Alliance for Freshwater Life (www.allianceforfreshwaterlife.org). We thank Nick Bond, Lisa Bossenbroek, Lekima Copeland, Dean Jacobsen, Maria Cecilia Londo?o, David Lopez, Jaime Ricardo Garcia Marquez, Ketlhatlogile Mosepele, Nunia Thomas-Moko, Qiwei Wei and the authors of Living Waters: A Research Agenda for the Biodiversity of Inland and Coastal Waters for their contributions. We also thank Peter Thrall, Ian Harrison and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments that helped improve the manuscript. Open access funding enabled and organised by Projekt DEAL

Beauty and the Beast (poster)

Performed October 28-29, 2005. Cast:Beast/Prince: Sam PetersBelle: Lindsay HoggattGaston: Caleb KeeseMaurice: Jeremy PainterLefou: Brandt RobertsD\u27arque: Joel CoxMrs. Potts: Alice-Anne MurrayLumiere: Travis WiselyCogsworth: Shawn FraizerBabette: Katie CaseyWardrobe: Joy PenningtonEnchantress/Old Woman: Laurie PadgettChip: Ty MoteYoung Prince: Collin BillsNarrators: Laura Eads and Craig JonesEnsemble: Jenna Aldridge, Mollee Baker, Benjamin Brown, Abby Chandler, Anne-Marie Coors, Andrea Copeland, Jennie Degge, Rebecca Deramus, Rachel Donald, Jordan Dyniewski, Keith Fisher, Andy Frye, J. Cliff Ganus, David Gerst, Evan Gregory, Elizabeth Harrell, Mark Jonston, Elaine Jones, Sarah Keese, Jerry LaFevers, Mriam Lenon, Scott Light, Don McLaughlin, Nick Milner, Amy Jo Parker, Matthrew Perring, David Pietzman, Jodi Pittard, Tony Randolph, Jordan Rousseau, Eden Steiner, Carla Stevens, Ian Thomas, Fletcher Tingle, Kim Toliver, and Aaron Tuckerhttps://scholarworks.harding.edu/theatre-history/1266/thumbnail.jp

A comparison of the Dodgson method and the Copeland rule

This paper compares binary versions of two well-known preference aggregation methods designed to overcome problems occurring from voting cycles, Copeland's (1951) and Dodgson''s (1876) method. In particular it will first be shown that the Copeland winner can occur at any position in the Dodgson ranking. Second, it will be proved that for some list of individual preferences over the set of alternatives, the Dodgson ranking and the Copeland ranking will be exactly the opposite, i.e. maximally different.Copeland Rule

The Crescent Student Newspaper, December 7, 2011

Student newspaper of George Fox University.https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/the_crescent/2349/thumbnail.jp

Theological Implications of the Simulation Argument

Nick Bostrom’s Simulation Argument (SA) has many intriguing theological implications. We work out some of them here. We show how the SA can be used to develop novel versions of the Cosmological and Design Arguments. We then develop some of the affinities between Bostrom's naturalistic theogony and more traditional theological topics. We look at the resurrection of the body and at theodicy. We conclude with some reflections on the relations between the SA and Neoplatonism (friendly) and between the SA and theism (less friendly)

Spartan Daily, April 25, 1957

Volume 44, Issue 113https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/12469/thumbnail.jp