Readiness of health facilities for the outpatient management of non-communicable diseases in a low-resource setting: an example from a facility-based cross-sectional survey in Tanzania

Objective This study assessed the readiness of health facilities to provide outpatient management of non-communicable diseases using a nationally representative sample of health facilities from Tanzania as an example of a low-resource country.Design Facility-based cross-sectional survey.Setting This study analysed data collected from public and private-owned dispensaries/clinics, health centres and hospitals during the 2014–2015 Tanzania Service Provision Assessment survey.Primary outcome measures Three outcome variables are included in this study, namely readiness of facilities to provide outpatient management for diabetes, hypertension and chronic respiratory diseases. These were composite variables measured based on availability of indicators identified in the WHO-Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual. These indicators were grouped into three domains, viz staff training and guidelines, basic diagnostic equipment and basic medicines. Readiness was measured by assessing the presence of required indicators in each of these domains.Results Out of 1188 health facilities assessed, 52.1%, 64.8% and 60.9% reported providing services related to diabetes, hypertension and chronic respiratory diseases, respectively. A few facilities reported having treatment guidelines (33.2%) or staff trained to provide non-communicable disease services (10.4%). The availability of basic diagnostic equipment and medicines for these diseases was significantly lower in public lower level facilities than in their private counterparts (p<0.05). Facilities located in urban settings as well as higher level (health centre and hospitals) and publicly owned facilities were significantly associated with increased service readiness index for providing outpatient management of non-communicable diseases.Conclusion A fair distribution of resources through the ‘push’ system of refresher training, treatment guidelines, medicines and diagnostic equipment from higher authorities or other agencies may be one way of strengthening the readiness of lower level and public facilities to cope with the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases in low-resource countries such as Tanzania

Allergic sensitization and work related asthma among poultry workers in South Africa

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the risk factors associated with allergic sensitisation and various asthma phenotypes in poultry workers. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 230 currently employed poultry workers used a modified ECRHS questionnaire, spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, Phadiatop and ImmunoCAP for specific IgE to poultry farming associated allergens (chicken meat, feathers, serum protein, droppings, sunflower seeds, storage mite) and mould mix to investigate workrelated asthma. Results: The mean dust particulate concentration (geometric mean (GM) =11.04mg/m³) was highest in the rearing department while mean (1-3)-ß-D-glucan (GM=148 ng/ m³) and endotoxin levels (GM=2298 EU/m³) were highest in the catching department. Worker's mean age was 37±9 years, 68% were male, 43% current smokers, 34% atopic and 5% casual workers. The prevalence of non-atopic asthma (NAA=10%) was higher than atopic asthma (AA=6%) or probable occupational asthma (OA=5%). Sensitisation to at least one poultry work related allergen was 24%, with sunflower seed and storage mite sensitisation being the most prevalent (13%). In multivariate adjusted models, workers sensitised to chicken specific allergens were more likely to be atopic (OR=20.9, 95% CI: 4.7-93.2) or have casual job status (OR=6.0, 95% CI: 1.1-35.9). Workers with work-related chest symptoms were more likely to work in the rearing department (OR=3.2, 95% CI: 1.2-8.3) and to report episodes of high gas/dust/fume exposures causing asthma symptoms (OR=4.8, 95%CI: 2.4-9.6). Reversible obstructive airway obstruction was more strongly associated with employment in small broiler farms (OR=11.6, 95% CI: 1.0-129.0) as well as casual work (OR=6.4, 95% CI: 1.4-28.0). Furthermore, NAA was strongly associated with casual work (OR=5.0, 95% CI: 1.3-19.0) as well as working in the automated egg laying system (OR=8.0, 95% CI: 1.0-68.6). Further analysis revealed that the proportion of workers sensitised to at least one poultry work related allergen declined with increasing years of service (chi-square trend p=0.023), with workers having 6 years employment (OR=4.0, 95% CI: 1.2-13.8). Conclusion: Non-atopic asthma is the most common asthma phenotype among poultry workers with work in the rearing department demonstrating an increased respiratory risk. The increased risk of reversible airway obstruction among workers in small broiler farms and the declining prevalence of sensitisation with increasing employment duration suggests a healthy worker effect. Preventive measures, including appropriate training, are recommended to reduce respiratory health risks, particularly in novice workers

Gender differences in respiratory health outcomes among farming cohorts around the globe: findings from the AGRICOH consortium

International audiencePurpose: Respiratory hazards of farming have been identified for centuries, with little focus on gender differences. We used data from the AGRICOH consortium, a collective of prospective cohorts of agricultural workers, to assess respiratory disease prevalence among adults in 18 cohorts representing over 200,000 farmers, farm workers, and their spouses from six continents.Methods: Cohorts collected data between 1992 and 2016 and ranged in size from 200 to >128,000 individuals; 44% of participants were female. Farming practices varied from subsistence farming to large-scale industrial agriculture. All cohorts provided respiratory outcome information for their cohort based on their study definitions. The majority of outcomes were based on self-report using standard respiratory questionnaires; the greatest variability in assessment methods was associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Results: For all three respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, and wheeze), the median prevalence in men was higher than in women, with the greatest difference for phlegm (17% vs. 10%). For asthma, women had a higher prevalence (7.8% vs 6.5%), with the difference associated with allergic asthma. The relative proportion of allergic asthma varied among cohorts. In two of eight cohorts for women and two of seven cohorts for men, allergic asthma was more common than non-allergic asthma.Conclusions: These findings indicate that respiratory outcomes are common among farmers around the world despite differences in agricultural production. As women in the general population are at higher risk of asthma, exploring gender differences in occupational studies is critical for a deeper understanding of respiratory disease among agricultural workers