2,345 research outputs found

    Becoming a fraternity member

    Get PDF

    [1875-06-28] Letter from John Henry Newman to unnamed Madam

    Get PDF
    Handwritten letter from John H. Newman to unnamed Madam regarding Mr. Charles Lloyd and his sisters.https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/johnhenrynewman/1002/thumbnail.jp

    [1877] Letter from John H. Newman to unnamed Sister in Christ

    Get PDF
    Handwritten note from John Henry Newman to unnamed Sister in Christ promising to remember her intentions at Mass.https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/johnhenrynewman/1003/thumbnail.jp

    [n.d.] Handwritten version of poem titled Corcyra

    Get PDF
    Handwritten version (possibly a draft) of poem titled Corcyra by John H. Newman. Document differs slightly from published 1833 version with same title.https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/johnhenrynewman/1000/thumbnail.jp

    Chrześcijaństwo a badania naukowe

    Get PDF

    Tracts for the times

    Get PDF
    https://place.asburyseminary.edu/ecommonsatsdigitalresources/1114/thumbnail.jp

    Comparison of serious inhaler technique errors made by device-naïve patients using three different dry powder inhalers: a randomised, crossover, open-label study

    Get PDF
    Background: Serious inhaler technique errors can impair drug delivery to the lungs. This randomised, crossover, open-label study evaluated the proportion of patients making predefined serious errors with Pulmojet compared with Diskus and Turbohaler dry powder inhalers. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with asthma and/or COPD who were current users of an inhaler but naïve to the study devices were assigned to inhaler technique assessment on Pulmojet and either Diskus or Turbohaler in a randomised order. Patients inhaled through empty devices after reading the patient information leaflet. If serious errors potentially affecting dose delivery were recorded, they repeated the inhalations after watching a training video. Inhaler technique was assessed by a trained nurse observer and an electronic inhalation profile recorder. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar between randomisation arms for the Pulmojet-Diskus (n = 277) and Pulmojet-Turbohaler (n = 144) comparisons. Non-inferiority in the proportions of patients recording no nurse-observed serious errors was demonstrated for both Pulmojet versus Diskus, and Pulmojet versus Turbohaler; therefore, superiority was tested. Patients were significantly less likely to make ≥1 nurse-observed serious errors using Pulmojet compared with Diskus (odds ratio, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.19–0.51) or Pulmojet compared with Turbohaler (0.23; 0.12–0.44) after reading the patient information leaflet with additional video instruction, if required. Conclusions These results suggest Pulmojet is easier to learn to use correctly than the Turbohaler or Diskus for current inhaler users switching to a new dry powder inhaler
    corecore