38 research outputs found

    Tumor Microvessel Density as a Prognostic Marker in High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated on ECOG-ACRIN E2805

    Get PDF
    Purpose—Increased vascularity is a hallmark of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Microvessel density (MVD) is one measurement of tumor angiogenesis; however, its utility as a biomarker of outcome is unknown. ECOG-ACRIN 2805 (E2805) enrolled 1,943 resected high-risk RCC patients randomized to adjuvant sunitinib, sorafenib, or placebo. We aimed to determine the prognostic and predictive role of MVD in RCC. Experimental Design—We obtained pretreatment primary RCC nephrectomy tissues from 822 patients on E2805 and constructed tissue microarrays. Using quantitative immunofluorescence, we measured tumor MVD as the area of CD34-expressing cells. We determined the association with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), treatment arm, and clinicopathologic variables. Results—High MVD (above the median) was associated with prolonged OS for the entire cohort (p = 0.021) and for patients treated with placebo (p = 0.028). The association between high MVD and OS was weaker in patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib (p = 0.060). MVD was not associated with DFS (p = 1.00). On multivariable analysis, MVD remained independently associated with improved OS (p = 0.013). High MVD correlated with Fuhrman grade 1–2 (p \u3c 0.001), clear cell histology (p \u3c 0.001), and absence of necrosis (p \u3c 0.001) but not with gender, age, sarcomatoid features, lymphovascular invasion, or tumor size. Conclusions—High MVD in resected high-risk RCC patients is an independent prognostic, rather than predictive, biomarker of improved OS. Further studies should assess whether incorporating MVD into clinical models will enhance our ability to predict outcome and if low MVD can be used for selection of high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy trials

    The ABCs of finding a good antibody: How to find a good antibody, validate it, and publish meaningful data [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

    No full text
    Finding an antibody that works for a specific application can be a difficult task. Hundreds of vendors offer millions of antibodies, but the quality of these products and available validation information varies greatly. In addition, several studies have called into question the reliability of published data as the primary metric for assessing antibody quality. We briefly discuss the antibody quality problem and provide best practice guidelines for selecting and validating an antibody, as well as for publishing data generated using antibodies

    Comparison of HER2 and Phospho-HER2 Expression between Biopsy and Resected Breast Cancer Specimens Using a Quantitative Assessment Method

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Background</p><p>HER2/Neu (ErbB-2) overexpression, which occurs in 15–20% of breast cancer cases, is associated with better response to treatment with the drug trastuzumab. PhosphoHER2 (pHER2) has been evaluated for prediction of response to trastuzumab. Both markers are heterogeneously detected and are potentially subject to loss as a consequence of delayed time to fixation. Here, we quantitatively assess both markers in core needle biopsies (CNBs) and matched tumor resections to assess concordance between the core and the resection and between HER2 and pHER2.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A selected retrospective collection of archival breast cancer cases yielded 67 cases with both core and resection specimens. Both HER2 and pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2 were analyzed by the AQUA® method of quantitative immunofluorescence on each specimen pair.</p><p>Results</p><p>Both HER2 immunoreactivity (P<0.0001) and pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2 immunoreactivity (P<0.0001) were lower in resections relative to CNB specimens. However, clinical implications of this change may not be evident since no case changed from 3+ (CNB) to negative (resection). Assessment of pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2 showed no direct correlation with HER2 in either CNB or resection specimens.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The data suggest that measurement of both HER2 and phospho- Tyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2, in formalin-fixed tissue by immunological methods is significantly affected by pre-analytic variables. The current study warrants the adequate handling of resected specimens for the reproducible evaluation of HER2 and pHER2. The level of pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2, was not correlated to total HER2 protein. Further studies are required to determine the significance of these observations with respect to response to HER2 directed therapies.</p></div

    Expression of HER2 in tumor resections compared to CNBs.

    No full text
    <p>AQUA HER2 scores of 63 pairs of CNB (open bars) and tumor resection (filled bars) were assessed. Average FOVs of CNB: average number of FOVs included in analysis of CNB; Average FOVs of Resection: average number of FOVs included in analysis of tumor resection specimens. The noise cut point is marked with a solid line. Each AQUA score represents the mean ±95% CI. The number of pairs where resections are higher, lower than CNBs, or equal to those of CNBs are listed in inset.</p

    Comparison between pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2 and HER2 AQUA.

    No full text
    <p>Scatter plot of HER2 and pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2 AQUA scores (CNBs, open diamonds; Resections, filled triangles). Lines in the graph represent the noise cut points of either HER2 or pTyr<sup>1248</sup>HER2.</p
    corecore