139 research outputs found

    Improved approach for chondrogenic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells

    Get PDF
    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have demonstrated great potential for hyaline cartilage regeneration. However, current approaches for chondrogenic differentiation of hiPSCs are complicated and inefficient primarily due to intermediate embryoid body formation, which is required to generate endodermal, ectodermal, and mesodermal cell lineages. We report a new, straightforward and highly efficient approach for chondrogenic differentiation of hiPSCs, which avoids embryoid body formation. We differentiated hiPSCs directly into mesenchymal stem /stromal cells (MSC) and chondrocytes. hiPSC-MSC-derived chondrocytes showed significantly increased Col2A1, GAG, and SOX9 gene expression compared to hiPSC-MSCs. Following transplantation of hiPSC-MSC and hiPSC-MSC-derived chondrocytes into osteochondral defects of arthritic joints of athymic rats, magnetic resonance imaging studies showed gradual engraftment, and histological correlations demonstrated hyaline cartilage matrix production. Results present an efficient and clinically translatable approach for cartilage tissue regeneration via patient-derived hiPSCs, which could improve cartilage regeneration outcomes in arthritic joints

    Universal applicator for digitally-controlled pressing force and impact velocity insertion of microneedles into skin

    Get PDF
    Microneedle technologies have been developed for dermal drug and vaccine delivery, including hollow-, solid-, coated-, and dissolving microneedles. Microneedles have been made in many different geometries and of many different materials, all of which may influence their skin-penetrating ability. To ensure reproducible and effective drug and vaccine delivery via microneedles, the optimal insertion parameters should be known. Therefore, a digitally-controlled microneedle applicator was developed to insert microneedles into the skin via impact insertion (velocity) or via pressing force insertion. Six microneedle arrays with different geometries and/or materials were applied onto ex vivo human skin with varying velocities or pressing forces. Penetration efficiency and delivered antigen dose into the skin after application of microneedles were determined. In general, microneedles pierced the skin more efficiently when applied by impact application as compared to application via pressing force. However, the angle of application of the applicator on the skin can affect the velocity of the impact, influencing the penetration efficiency of microneedles. Regarding the antigen delivery into the skin, the delivered dose was increasing by increasing the velocity or pressure, and thus, increasing the penetration efficiency. These data demonstrate that an applicator is an important tool to determine optimal application conditions with ex vivo human skin

    How Do Bacteria Know They Are on a Surface and Regulate Their Response to an Adhering State?

    Get PDF
    Bacteria adhere to virtually all natural and synthetic surfaces [1,2]. Although there are a number of different reasons as to why bacteria adhere to a surface, the summarizing answer is brief: ‘‘Adhesion to a surface is a survival mechanism for bacteria’’. Nutrients in aqueous environments have the tendency to accumulate at surfaces [1,3], giving adhering bacteria a benefit over free floating, so-called planktonic ones. This is why mountain creeks may contain crystal clear, drinkable water, while stepping stones underneath the water may be covered with a slippery film of adhering microbes. In the oral cavity, adhesion to dental hard and soft tissues is life-saving to the organisms, because microbes that do not manage to adhere and remain planktonic in saliva are swallowed with an almost certain death in the gastrointestinal tract. Bacterial adhesion is generally recognized as the first step in biofilm formation, and for the human host, the ability of

    Surface-Initiated Polymer Brushes in the Biomedical Field: Applications in Membrane Science, Biosensing, Cell Culture, Regenerative Medicine and Antibacterial Coatings

    Get PDF

    The use of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: a systematic review.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The management of articular cartilage defects presents many clinical challenges due to its avascular, aneural and alymphatic nature. Bone marrow stimulation techniques, such as microfracture, are the most frequently used method in clinical practice however the resulting mixed fibrocartilage tissue which is inferior to native hyaline cartilage. Other methods have shown promise but are far from perfect. There is an unmet need and growing interest in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering to improve the outcome for patients requiring cartilage repair. Many published reviews on cartilage repair only list human clinical trials, underestimating the wealth of basic sciences and animal studies that are precursors to future research. We therefore set out to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the translation of stem cell therapy to explore what research had been carried out at each of the stages of translation from bench-top (in vitro), animal (pre-clinical) and human studies (clinical) and assemble an evidence-based cascade for the responsible introduction of stem cell therapy for cartilage defects. This review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines using CINHAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases from 1st January 1900 to 30th June 2015. In total, there were 2880 studies identified of which 252 studies were included for analysis (100 articles for in vitro studies, 111 studies for animal studies; and 31 studies for human studies). There was a huge variance in cell source in pre-clinical studies both of terms of animal used, location of harvest (fat, marrow, blood or synovium) and allogeneicity. The use of scaffolds, growth factors, number of cell passages and number of cells used was hugely heterogeneous. SHORT CONCLUSIONS: This review offers a comprehensive assessment of the evidence behind the translation of basic science to the clinical practice of cartilage repair. It has revealed a lack of connectivity between the in vitro, pre-clinical and human data and a patchwork quilt of synergistic evidence. Drivers for progress in this space are largely driven by patient demand, surgeon inquisition and a regulatory framework that is learning at the same pace as new developments take place
    • …
    corecore