4 research outputs found
Zjawiskowe formy popełnienia czynu zabronionego w prawie karnym Ukrainy
Complicity in crime is one of the forms of criminal activity. It has its specific features which allow the scholars to treat complicity as a separate criminal law institution. These specific features comprise the following elements: a) the participation in the commission of an offence of two or more persons bears a heightened danger for the public safety; b) an offence with its statutory features is committed only due to the joint action of all participants. The institution of complicity in the commission of an offence is regulated in greater detail by the Criminal Code of Ukraine from 2001 than it was the case in the Criminal Code form 1960. The whole Chapter IV of the General Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine entitled “Complicity in the commission of an offence” is devoted to it. Some norms referring to the problem can also be found in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Despite such a detailed legal cover of the institution of complicity in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, individual problems are not sufficiently explained and there are some internal contradictions as well. Therefore the issues, conclusions and propositions presented in this article referring to the improvement of the criminal law seem to be up to date and indispensable. It is necessary to amend the individual legal issues referring to complicity and to explain them with greater precision. This will foster greater effectiveness in counteracting such criminal acts.Artykuł nie zawiera abstraktu w języku polski
The Ukrainian Model of Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods
The Ukrainian model of methods of alternative dispute resolution is analyzed. It’s established that Ukraine is only on the stage of forming a national model of methods of alternative dispute resolution. Presently, without regard to absence of the special legislation, Ukraine can boast its own experience of application of mediation procedure, that confirms high efficiency of implementation of this institution into the dispute resolution. Under the conditions of reformation of the judicial system now before the Ukrainian legislator a question appeared about what model of mediation to investigate in Ukraine. Two dominant in this aspect concepts are analyzed. The first of them — a concept of judicial mediation (the mediation must become a component part of judicial procedure). The second — is a concept of extrajudicial mediation (it must function in parallel with a trial, and ideally — preceed to it) = Проаналізовано українську модель способів альтернативного вирішення спорів. Зроблено висновок, що Україна перебуває лише на етапі формування національної моделі способів альтернативного вирішення спорів. В даний час, не зважаючи на відсутність спеціального законодавства, Україна може похвалитися своїм власним досвідом застосування процедури медіації, що підтверджує високу ефективність застосування цього інституту при вирішенні конфліктів. В умовах реформування судової системи зараз перед українським законодавцем постало питання про те, яку модель медіації ввести в Україні. Проаналізовано дві домінуючі в даному аспекті концепції. Перша — концепція судової медіації, відповідно до якої вона повинна стати складовою частиною процесуальної процедури. Друга — концепція позасудової медіації, прихильники якої розглядають її як альтернативний спосіб вирішення спорів, який повинен функціонувати паралельно із судовим процесом, а в ідеалі — передувати йом
The criminal responsibility for defamation of knowingly innocent
The scientific article analyzes the acute discussion in law enforcement practice and procedural science of the problem of the possibility of criminal prosecution of a suspect, accused of defaming a knowingly innocent person in the commission of a crime. The theoretical basis of the article are scientific works on criminal law and criminal procedural law (both domestic researchers and foreign experts). A set of general scientific, special scientific and philosophical methods of scientific knowledge has been used while preparing the scientific article, in particular dialectical, historical, comparative, dogmatic (formal-logical), system-structural analysis, modeling. It is substantiated in the article that the behavior of the suspect, accused, which is manifested in slandering of a knowingly innocent person, does not constitute the right to freedom from self-disclosure. It is also proved that both freedom from self-disclosure and the right to defense in criminal proceedings must have certain limits, in particular, it is rights and interests of other subjects protected by criminal law. We stated that the suspect or accused should be liable for misleading the court and pre-trial investigation bodies even if such deception was used to protect against the suspicion (or accusation), to avoid criminal liability
Zjawiskowe formy popełnienia czynu zabronionego w prawie karnym Ukrainy
Complicity in crime is one of the forms of criminal activity. It has its specific features which allow the scholars to treat complicity as a separate criminal law institution. These specific features comprise the following elements: a) the participation in the commission of an offence of two or more persons bears a heightened danger for the public safety; b) an offence with its statutory features is committed only due to the joint action of all participants. The institution of complicity in the commission of an offence is regulated in greater detail by the Criminal Code of Ukraine from 2001 than it was the case in the Criminal Code form 1960. The whole Chapter IV of the General Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine entitled “Complicity in the commission of an offence” is devoted to it. Some norms referring to the problem can also be found in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Despite such a detailed legal cover of the institution of complicity in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, individual problems are not sufficiently explained and there are some internal contradictions as well. Therefore the issues, conclusions and propositions presented in this article referring to the improvement of the criminal law seem to be up to date and indispensable. It is necessary to amend the individual legal issues referring to complicity and to explain them with greater precision. This will foster greater effectiveness in counteracting such criminal acts.Artykuł nie zawiera abstraktu w języku polski