Osteopetrosis and related osteoclast disorders in adults:A review and knowledge gapsOn behalf of the European calcified tissue society and ERN BOND

Osteopetrosis refers to a group of related rare bone diseases characterized by a high bone mass due to impaired bone resorption by osteoclasts. Despite the high bone mass, skeletal strength is compromised and the risk of fracture is high, particularly in the long bones. Osteopetrosis was classically categorized by inheritance pattern into autosomal recessive forms (ARO), which are severe and diagnosed within the first years of life, an intermediate form and an autosomal dominant (ADO) form; the latter with variable clinical severity and typically diagnosed during adolescence or in young adulthood. Subsequently, the AD form was shown to be a result of mutations in the gene CLCN7 encoding for the ClC-7 chloride channel). Traditionally, the diagnosis of osteopetrosis was made on radiograph appearance alone, but recent molecular and genetic advances have enabled a greater fidelity in classification of osteopetrosis subtypes. In the more severe ARO forms (e.g., malignant infantile osteopetrosis MIOP) typical clinical features have severe consequences and often result in death in early childhood. Major complications of ADO are atypical fractures with delay or failure of repair and challenge in orthopedic management. Bone marrow failure, dental abscess, deafness and visual loss are often underestimated and neglected in relation with lack of awareness and expertise. Accordingly, the care of adult patients with osteopetrosis requires a multidisciplinary approach ideally in specialized centers. Apart from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in certain infantile forms, the treatment of patients with osteopetrosis, has not been standardized and remains supportive. Further clinical studies are needed to improve our knowledge of the natural history, optimum management and impact of osteopetrosis on the lives of patients living with the disorder

Osteoporosis in children and adolescents:when to suspect and how to diagnose it

Early recognition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents is important in order to establish an appropriate diagnosis of the underlying condition and to initiate treatment if necessary. In this review, we present the diagnostic work-up, and its pitfalls, of pediatric patients suspected of osteoporosis including a careful collection of the medical and personal history, a complete physical examination, biochemical data, molecular genetics, and imaging techniques. The most recent and relevant literature has been reviewed to offer a broad overview on the topic. Genetic and acquired pediatric bone disorders are relatively common and cause substantial morbidity. In recent years, there has been significant progress in the understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanistic basis of bone fragility and in the identification of acquired causes of osteoporosis in children. Specifically, drugs that can negatively impact bone health (e.g. steroids) and immobilization related to acute and chronic diseases (e.g. Duchenne muscular dystrophy) represent major risk factors for the development of secondary osteoporosis and therefore an indication to screen for bone mineral density and vertebral fractures. Long-term studies in children chronically treated with steroids have resulted in the development of systematic approaches to diagnose and manage pediatric osteoporosis. Conclusions: Osteoporosis in children requires consultation with and/or referral to a pediatric bone specialist. This is particularly relevant since children possess the unique ability for spontaneous and medication-assisted recovery, including reshaping of vertebral fractures. As such, pediatricians have an opportunity to improve bone mass accrual and musculoskeletal health in osteoporotic children.What is Known:• Both genetic and acquired pediatric disorders can compromise bone health and predispose to fractures early in life.• The identification of children at risk of osteoporosis is essential to make a timely diagnosis and start the treatment, if necessary.What is New:• Pediatricians have an opportunity to improve bone mass accrual and musculoskeletal health in osteoporotic children and children at risk of osteoporosis.• We offer an extensive but concise overview about the risk factors for osteoporosis and the diagnostic work-up (and its pitfalls) of pediatric patients suspected of osteoporosis

Hypercalcemia during pregnancy: management and outcomes for mother and child

Diagnosing and treating hypercalcemia during pregnancy can be challenging due to both the physiological changes in calcium homeostasis and the underlying cause for the hypercalcemia. During pregnancy and lactation there is increased mobilization of calcium in the mother to meet the fetus’ calcium requirements. Here we discuss the diagnostic challenges, management, and patient perspective of hypercalcemia during pregnancy in two particular cases and in other rare conditions causing hypercalcemia

Prevalence of Monogenic Bone Disorders in a Dutch Cohort of Atypical Femur Fracture Patients

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs), considered rare associations of bisphosphonates, have also been reported in patients with monogenic bone disorders without bisphosphonate use. The exact association between AFFs and monogenic bone disorders remains unknown. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of monogenic bone disorders in a Dutch AFF cohort. AFF patients were recruited from two specialist bone centers in the Netherlands. Medical records of the AFF patients were reviewed for clinical features of monogenic bone disorders. Genetic variants identified by whole-exome sequencing in 37 candidate genes involved in monogenic bone disorders were classified based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) classification guidelines. Copy number variations overlapping the candidate genes were also evaluated using DNA array genotyping data. The cohort comprises 60 AFF patients (including a pair of siblings), with 95% having received bisphosphonates. Fifteen AFF patients (25%) had clinical features of monogenic bone disorders. Eight of them (54%), including the pair of siblings, had a (likely) pathogenic variant in either PLS3, COL1A2, LRP5, or ALPL. One patient carried a likely pathogenic variant in TCIRG1 among patients not suspected of monogenic bone disorders (2%). In total, nine patients in this AFF cohort (15%) had a (likely) pathogenic variant. In one patient, we identified a 12.7 Mb deletion in chromosome 6, encompassing TENT5A. The findings indicate a strong relationship between AFFs and monogenic bone disorders, particularly osteogenesis imperfecta and hypophosphatasia, but mainly in individuals with symptoms of these disorders. The high yield of (likely) pathogenic variants in AFF patients with a clinical suspicion of these disorders stresses the importance of careful clinical evaluation of AFF patients. Although the relevance of bisphosphonate use in this relationship is currently unclear, clinicians should consider these findings in medical management of these patients.</p

¹⁸F-Sodium fluoride PET-CT visualizes disease activity in chronic nonbacterial osteitis in adults

Chronic nonbacterial osteitis (CNO) is a rare disease spectrum, which lacks biomarkers for disease activity. Sodium fluoride-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]NaF-PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging tool for bone diseases and yields quantitative data on bone turnover. We evaluated the capacities of [18F]NaF-PET/CT to provide structural and functional assessment in adult CNO. A coss-sectional study was performed including 43 adult patients with CNO and 16 controls (patients referred for suspected, but not diagnosed with CNO) who underwent [18F]NaF-PET/CT at our expert clinic. Structural features were compared between patients and controls, and maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax [g/mL]) were calculated for bone lesions, soft tissue/joint lesions, and reference bone. SUVmax was correlated with clinical disease activity in patients. Structural assessment revealed manubrial and costal sclerosis/hyperostosis and calcification of the costoclavicular ligament as typical features associated with CNO. SUVmax of CNO lesions was higher compared with in-patient reference bone (mean paired difference: 11.4; 95% CI: 9.4–13.5; p &lt; .001) and controls (mean difference: 12.4; 95%CI: 9.1–15.8; p &lt; .001). The highest SUVmax values were found in soft tissue and joint areas such as the costoclavicular ligament and manubriosternal joint, and these correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients (correlation coefficient: 0.546; p &lt; .002). Our data suggest that [18F]NaF-PET/CT is a promising imaging tool for adult CNO, allowing for detailed structural evaluation of its typical bone, soft-tissue, and joint features. At the same time, [18F]NaF-PET/CT yields quantitative bone remodeling data that represent the pathologically increased bone turnover and the process of new bone formation. Further studies should investigate the application of quantified [18F]NaF uptake as a novel biomarker for disease activity in CNO, and its utility to steer clinical decision making.</p

ERN BOND:The key European network leveraging diagnosis, research, and treatment for rare bone conditions

There is no universally accepted definition for rare diseases: in Europe a disease is considered to be rare when affecting fewer than 1 in 2000 people. European Reference Networks (ERNs) have been the concrete response to address the unmet needs of rare disease patients and many pan-European issues in the field, reducing inequities, and significantly increasing accessibility to high-quality healthcare across Europe. ERNs are virtual networks, involving centres and patient representatives with the general scope to facilitate discussion on complex cases requiring highly specialised competences and trained expertise. ERN BOND - the European Reference Network on rare BONe Diseases - is one of these 24 approved networks with the specific ongoing mission to implement measures facilitating multidisciplinary, holistic, continuous, patient-centred, and participative care provision to patients, and supporting them in the full realisation of their fundamental human rights. ERN BOND includes in 2023 a total of 53 centres of expertise from 20 European countries. Its governing structure installed in March 2017 includes decision-making, operative and consultative committees, which comprise experts in the field and patient representatives ensuring patient's voice and perspectives are taken into account. Over the years, ERN BOND has worked hard to achieve its mission and valuably contribute to the advancement of diagnosis, management, treatment, and research in rare diseases. The network activities are mainly related to (i) the provision of care which collectively involves averagely 2800 patients diagnosed per year, (ii) the development of education for and training of the healthcare personnel consisting until now in the realisation of 7 thematic workshops and 19 webinars, (iii) the dissemination and exchange and spread of knowledge via network's website (https://ernbond.eu/), social media channels, and newsletters, (iv) the management of related data through a disease registry currently mapping over 2300 cases and recording over 600 reported cases, and (v) the enhancement of research which now include two clinical trials endorsed by the network. ERN BOND represents therefore an unprecedented move to improve the healthcare management of patients suffering from rare bone diseases through European collaborations. This network, through the support from the European Health Programme, will continue to pursue its efforts to achieve its goals, always maintaining the patients and their families at the centre of healthcare services.</p

Correction to: Outcomes of parathyroidectomy versus calcimimetics for secondary hyperparathyroidism and kidney transplantation:a propensity-matched analysis

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake on the fifth and eleventh author names, from Schelto Kruijf to Schelto Kruijff and from Tessa van Ginhoven to Tessa M. van Ginhoven. The corrected author names are shown below. Schelto Kruijff and Tessa M. van Ginhoven

Multi-generational House

BUTOROVÁ, H.: Dvougenerační rodinný dům: Bakalářská práce. Ostrava: VŠB-Technická univerzita Ostrava, Fakulta stavební, Katedra architektury 226, 2017, 49 s. Vedoucí práce: Student, A. Předmětem bakalářské práce „Dvougenerační rodinný dům“ je vypracování částečné projektové dokumentace pro provádění stavby podle vyhlášky 499/2006 Sb., o dokumentaci staveb. Jako podklad bakalářské práce slouží architektonická studie vypracovaná v rámci předmětu Ateliérová tvorba I a dokumentace pro stavební povolení vypracovaná v předmětu Ateliérová tvorba Va. Rodinný dvougenerační dům je navržen v lázeňské oblasti Karviná-Darkov. Stavba je složena z části pro mladou rodinu a z části pro starší rodiče. Cílem bylo vytvořit společné zázemí obou rodin, avšak i dostatek soukromí. Koncepce domu je založena na přízemní části staršího páru a na dvoupodlažní části mladé čtyřčlenné rodiny.BUTOROVÁ, H.: Multi-generational House: Bachelor´s thesis. Ostrava: VŠB-Technical university of Ostrava, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Architecture 226, 2017, 49 p. Thesis head: Student, A. The subject of bachelor’s thesis „Multi-generational House‟ is preparation of partial project documentation for construction of a building according to notice 499/2006 Sb., about documentation of buildings. As resource materials serves architectural study worked out from Studio Work I and a documentation for building permit worked out from Studio Work Va. Multi-generational House is projected in the spa area Karviná-Darkov. The building consists of a part for young family and a part for grandparents. The goal was to make a common base for both families, but also to secure enough privacy. The philosophy of the house is based on the ground part for older couple and on the two-floor part for young four-member family.226 - Katedra architekturyvelmi dobř

Timing of Parathyroidectomy Does Not Influence Renal Function After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND: Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with therapy-resistant hyperparathyroidism (HPT). The optimal timing of PTx for ESRD-related HPT-before or after kidney transplantation (KTx)-is subject of debate.METHODS: Patients with ESRD-related HPT who underwent both PTx and KTx between 1994 and 2015 were included in a multicenter retrospective study in four university hospitals. Two groups were formed according to treatment sequence: PTx before KTx (PTxKTx) and PTx after KTx (KTxPTx). Primary endpoint was renal function (eGFR, CKD-EPI) between both groups at several time points post-transplantation. Correlation between the timing of PTx and KTx and the course of eGFR was assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE).RESULTS: The PTxKTx group consisted of 102 (55.1%) and the KTxPTx group of 83 (44.9%) patients. Recipient age, donor type, PTx type, and pre-KTx PTH levels were significantly different between groups. At 5 years after transplantation, eGFR was similar in the PTxKTx group (eGFR 44.5 ± 4.0 ml/min/1.73 m2) and KTxPTx group (40.0 ± 6.4 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.43). The unadjusted GEE model showed that timing of PTx was not correlated with graft function over time (mean difference -1.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% confidence interval -8.4 to 6.4, p = 0.79). Adjustment for potential confounders including recipient age and sex, various donor characteristics, PTx type, and PTH levels did not materially influence the results.CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter cohort study, timing of PTx before or after KTx does not independently impact graft function over time.</p

Outcomes of parathyroidectomy versus calcimimetics for secondary hyperparathyroidism and kidney transplantation:a propensity-matched analysis

Purpose: Calcimimetics are currently indicated for severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, the role of parathyroidectomy (PTX) for these patients is still under debate, and its impact on subsequent kidney transplantation (KTX) is unclear. In this study, we compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation after PTX or medical treatment. Methods: Patients who underwent KTX and had SHPT were analyzed retrospectively. Two groups were selected (patients who had either PTX or calcimimetics prior to KTX) using a propensity score for sex, age, donor type, and parathyroid hormone levels (PTH) during dialysis. The primary outcome was graft failure, and secondary outcomes were surgical KTX complications, survival, serum PTH, serum calcium, and serum phosphate levels post-KTX. Results: Matching succeeded for 92 patients. After PTX, PTH was significantly lower on the day of KTX as well as at 1 and 3 years post-KTX (14.00 pmol/L (3.80–34.00) vs. 71.30 pmol/L (30.70–108.30), p < 0.01, 10.10 pmol/L (2.00–21.00) vs. 32.35 pmol/L (21.58–51.76), p < 0.01 and 13.00 pmol/L (6.00–16.60) vs. 19.25 pmol/L (13.03–31.88), p = 0.027, respectively). No significant differences in post-KTX calcium and phosphate levels were noted between groups. Severe KTX complications were more common in the calcimimetics group (56.5% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.047). There were no differences in 10-year graft failure and overall survival. Conclusion: PTX resulted in lower PTH after KTX in comparison to patients who received calcimimetics. Severe complications were more common after calcimimetics, but graft failure and overall survival were similar